Rnr Removed - Dumbing Down Is The Beginning Of The End
#1
Posted 17 December 2012 - 05:02 PM
Now I can expect to see complete stupidity on the battlefield since there are no consequences to dying.
I am NOT looking forward to this patch.
#2
Posted 17 December 2012 - 05:04 PM
#4
Posted 17 December 2012 - 05:06 PM
Mech Merc, on 17 December 2012 - 05:02 PM, said:
Now I can expect to see complete stupidity on the battlefield since there are no consequences to dying.
I am NOT looking forward to this patch.
What....
There's a consequence in dying - not winning. You'll still earn less if you lose.
#5
Posted 17 December 2012 - 05:06 PM
Edited by KuruptU4Fun, 17 December 2012 - 05:06 PM.
#7
Posted 17 December 2012 - 05:07 PM
Carrot: doing smart things gets you money
They don't really need to have both.
Also, let's be fair, R&R discouraged playing XL engines, Ferro armor, Assault mechs, and missile mechs more than it discouraged being stupid.
#8
Posted 17 December 2012 - 05:08 PM
I've been around to know that sometimes temporary becomes a permanent change.
I didn't see anything about it being a temp change in the dev notes.
#9
Posted 17 December 2012 - 05:09 PM
#10
Posted 17 December 2012 - 05:10 PM
One Medic Army, on 17 December 2012 - 05:07 PM, said:
Carrot: doing smart things gets you money
They don't really need to have both.
Also, let's be fair, R&R discouraged playing XL engines, Ferro armor, Assault mechs, and missile mechs more than it discouraged being stupid.
I like that, going to have to remember it.
#11
Posted 17 December 2012 - 05:11 PM
One Medic Army, on 17 December 2012 - 05:07 PM, said:
Carrot: doing smart things gets you money
They don't really need to have both.
Also, let's be fair, R&R discouraged playing XL engines, Ferro armor, Assault mechs, and missile mechs more than it discouraged being stupid.
You're taking the removal of R&R as permanent. It's not. Just like the 1.8 damage on LRMs, lag-shielded Jenners running amok, etc.
It's a beta. And honestly, the patch hasn't even hit yet. R&R costs are figured into the winnings; let's just see how that balances out before cursing the system.
#12
Posted 17 December 2012 - 05:12 PM
the sky isnt falling your roof is just falling apart,
#13
Posted 17 December 2012 - 05:12 PM
#15
Posted 17 December 2012 - 05:12 PM
#16
Posted 17 December 2012 - 05:13 PM
#17
Posted 17 December 2012 - 05:16 PM
Sifright, on 17 December 2012 - 05:03 PM, said:
I am going to enjoy saying this so much it shouldn't be possible.
LEARN 2 PLAY DUDE.
DONT LIKE IT LEAVE!
ITS JUST A BETA I MEAN GOD.
MUWHAHAHAHAH
by the by, the penalty for dieing is that you make it more likely your team lose.
Losing means you played badly and didn't help your 'faction' when CW comes out.
edit: i really shouldn't take such a saddistic pleasure in doing this to the whinging founders who did this new players constantly when they explained the new player experience but you know what they say.
Pay back is a b!tch and so are you!
double edit:
Don't forget the sky is falling.
Why should we learn to play if there is no reason to excel? It is just Beta and I hope the Devs find what they are looking for before the next patch. And my favorite retort... WHy should I leave when I am already Right!!!
#18
Posted 17 December 2012 - 05:16 PM
Sifright, on 17 December 2012 - 05:03 PM, said:
I am going to enjoy saying this so much it shouldn't be possible.
LEARN 2 PLAY DUDE.
DONT LIKE IT LEAVE!
ITS JUST A BETA I MEAN GOD.
MUWHAHAHAHAH
by the by, the penalty for dieing is that you make it more likely your team lose.
Losing means you played badly and didn't help your 'faction' when CW comes out.
edit: i really shouldn't take such a saddistic pleasure in doing this to the whinging founders who did this new players constantly when they explained the new player experience but you know what they say.
Pay back is a b!tch and so are you!
double edit:
Don't forget the sky is falling.
Do you have evidence that he specifically is a "Whining Founder"? Or is this more of your usual baseless vitriol? I swear, you and Vassagogel are competing mighty hard for title of "King Troll". Heaven forbid someone disagree with you. What happened in your poor sad existence made you so... Hateful? Oh btw I still support the devs. Don't care what the reward system is, I'll make money either way, as long as I get to blow up mechs...IN A MECH!
Edited by Stone Profit, 17 December 2012 - 05:18 PM.
#19
Posted 17 December 2012 - 05:17 PM
The economy for MWO made no sense as the only way to win it was to not play, either by skipping repairs and rearms as much as possible or not fighting to avoid damage and expending ammo.
#20
Posted 17 December 2012 - 05:18 PM
Mech Merc, on 17 December 2012 - 05:08 PM, said:
I've been around to know that sometimes temporary becomes a permanent change.
I didn't see anything about it being a temp change in the dev notes.
My sentence was this:
Or understand the R&R removal may be a temporary thing while they collect data on Conquest mode.
Pay attention to the bold word. Things change all the time, especially when it comes to economics. We've seen hard times when it was difficult to make money BEFORE R&R, and when it went the other way and money was handed out on a silver platter.
PGI was taking data the entire time. Then using it accordingly to balance out the economy.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
This topic is locked

















