Ask The Devs 29A!
#281
Posted 28 December 2012 - 10:37 AM
#282
Posted 28 December 2012 - 10:42 AM
At the moment AFAIK we are only able to make screenshots via external programs (like FRAPs) as there is no in game shortcut and screenshots via print-key only turn up a black screen.
So it would be interesting to know if it is planned, to include a way to do screenshots in game without having to have external applications running (which, at least in case of FRAPs, slow the game down and therefore are not a good thing to keep running unless you plan beforehand to actually use it in the current session) ... after all, most other games have such a functionality (and, thinking of the graphics in MWO, I´d guess it would be a functionality that would be used by a lot of players)
#283
Posted 28 December 2012 - 12:47 PM
Bors Mistral, on 23 December 2012 - 08:12 AM, said:
At the moment, the 3H and 4N are completely outclassed by the other variants. The 3F is also a poor choice, if it wasn't for it having a torso twist of 85 while every other model only goes 60. Was the higher twist range on the 3F by design, or is the twist range on the other models so much lower by error? This is the only mech that features such a disparity.
Also, the same request I always have: explaining to the community what the reasoning behind Tripple-Slot-Heatsincs having different values in and outside of the engine is.
Happy holidays!
Ditto. Are the torso twist values for the Stalker correct? i.e. ~ 85 deg for the 3F and ~ 60 deg for the other variants.
#284
Posted 28 December 2012 - 12:50 PM
So we will have a Ask the Devs 29B for next week.
'(^.^)'
#285
Posted 28 December 2012 - 04:32 PM
#286
Posted 28 December 2012 - 05:21 PM
In addition, will you also create Clan Faction Icons for the Invading Clans?
Edited by Will9761, 29 December 2012 - 12:35 PM.
#287
Posted 29 December 2012 - 05:31 AM
Strum Wealh, on 25 December 2012 - 06:45 PM, said:
[snipped for brevity]
In conclusion: MWO's implementation of ECM is indeed potent, but the abilities exhibited thus far do generally have a basis in BT canon or are logical and intuitive consequences thereof.
(a large part of) The issue is that the guardian stops identification, not detection and by extension LRM lock-ons at those ranges - as it currently does in-game. if it stopped target info gathering that would be closer to what you/the original rulebook described. It does not stop sensors figuring out the location at range. As you quoted, "Enemy long-range sensors can find vehicles and 'Mechs within the curtain".
#288
Posted 29 December 2012 - 05:52 AM
#289
Posted 29 December 2012 - 05:58 AM
#290
Posted 29 December 2012 - 12:45 PM
Tolkien, on 20 December 2012 - 01:10 PM, said:
Question 1 is about ECM)
How was it considered balanced to introduce a 1.5 ton 2 slot piece of equipment that does all of the following:
i) Counters Artemis
ii) Counters BAP
iii) Counters TAG bonuses and the whole system inside of 180m
iv) Counters NARC - a system which weighs more and requires real skill and teamwork to use
v) Counters other ECMs
vi) Destroys LRM locks
vii) Destroys SSRM locks
viii) Ruins information sharing via minimap
ix) Scrambles HUD display of enemies
x) relegates AMS to the dustbin
xi) Requires no exploding ammo
xii) Generates no heat
xiii) Costs less than a much less useful module by a factor of 15...
xiv) Doesn't use up a weapon hardpoint
Going by tonnage and critical space the ECM should be about as useful as a small laser plus a regular heatsink.
Or a medium laser and a little armor,
Or an AMS and a ton of ammo
etc.
As it stands now, ECM is the single most useful item in the game in terms of how it affects the battlefield.
Here's a link to the existing unanswered question from 'ask the devs' 29: http://mwomercs.com/...ost__p__1598770
That question is up to 164 likes at last count (165 if you count me).
Bump.
#291
Posted 29 December 2012 - 01:33 PM
Edited by Will9761, 29 December 2012 - 03:29 PM.
#292
Posted 29 December 2012 - 02:45 PM
#293
Posted 29 December 2012 - 03:24 PM
Edited by Will9761, 29 December 2012 - 03:28 PM.
#294
Posted 29 December 2012 - 04:30 PM
Will9761, on 29 December 2012 - 03:24 PM, said:
There will be music, it's just not done yet. If I recall correctly they're already working on this.
#295
Posted 29 December 2012 - 04:47 PM
#296
Posted 29 December 2012 - 04:52 PM
Edited by Will9761, 29 December 2012 - 04:53 PM.
#297
Posted 29 December 2012 - 05:01 PM
#298
Posted 29 December 2012 - 05:53 PM
#299
Posted 29 December 2012 - 06:20 PM
Will9761, on 29 December 2012 - 04:52 PM, said:
At this point in time he's probably a contender rather than a commentator. Or, maybe, he's everywhere at once!
Check this link: if I recall, he's BOTH Khan of Clan Wolf AND Peter Steiner-Davion. Now, that's a lot of responsibility!
Enjoy!
http://georgeledoux....warriormercena/
#300
Posted 29 December 2012 - 06:26 PM
Peiper, on 29 December 2012 - 06:20 PM, said:
At this point in time he's probably a contender rather than a commentator. Or, maybe, he's everywhere at once!
Check this link: if I recall, he's BOTH Khan of Clan Wolf AND Peter Steiner-Davion. Now, that's a lot of responsibility!
Enjoy!
http://georgeledoux....warriormercena/
This is awesome! Thanks for the info.
9 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 9 guests, 0 anonymous users