Jump to content

BattleMech 11: Cataphract


493 replies to this topic

#481 Vulture2k

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 174 posts
  • LocationGermany

Posted 07 November 2012 - 10:25 PM

A real beauty you created there.. just dont mess up the cockpit :lol:

#482 verybad

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,229 posts

Posted 07 November 2012 - 11:54 PM

View PostBarranoid, on 01 November 2012 - 03:17 AM, said:


Tell that to dozens of Hunchys and Dragons that tend to die in fire as soon as you break their side torsos. It's no matter of skill. A brawler has to be at the front line, fighting in circles of death against mostly other brawlers. No center torso armor is going to keep you alive when a lucky shot breaches through your side torso while circling, tearing your XL appart.

Let him keep saying that. I LOVE people to use XL engines.

#483 Lima Zulu

    Russian Community Champion

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,971 posts

Posted 08 November 2012 - 12:02 AM

20th is confirmed
But what is strange: 3D and 4X pictures are completely the same, while 4X should have AC5 in each hand and single LL in center torso along with LRM in.. head, accroding to tabletop.

I only hope it's cockpit hitbox will be smaller than it's drawed. I mean, c'mon, it takes almost all CT and faced directly to enemy.

Btw, there is a correct 4X image on heavy mechs page
Posted Image

#484 ATao

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 574 posts

Posted 11 November 2012 - 04:43 AM

View PostLima Zulu, on 08 November 2012 - 12:02 AM, said:

I only hope it's cockpit hitbox will be smaller than it's drawed. I mean, c'mon, it takes almost all CT and faced directly to enemy.

THIS and I can't stress how much. It will be the biggest and easiest to hit cockpit so far if it's hitbox is the same as it seems visually on model (i.e. where "windows" are). I really do hope for something like that:

Posted Image


Obviously in TT there's no difference in how large the cockpit looks. Here... size matters ;) . Imo it's ok for PGI to even redraw original mech models so their parts are more balanced in size or at least adjust hitboxes accordingly.

Edited by Alexander Malthus, 11 November 2012 - 04:58 AM.


#485 Squidhead Jax

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,434 posts

Posted 11 November 2012 - 07:48 AM

View PostAlexander Malthus, on 11 November 2012 - 04:43 AM, said:

THIS and I can't stress how much. It will be the biggest and easiest to hit cockpit so far if it's hitbox is the same as it seems visually on model (i.e. where "windows" are). I really do hope for something like that:

Posted Image


Obviously in TT there's no difference in how large the cockpit looks. Here... size matters ;) . Imo it's ok for PGI to even redraw original mech models so their parts are more balanced in size or at least adjust hitboxes accordingly.


:/ I really hope they pare that down, I've really been looking forward to the Cataphract.

#486 SilentSooYun

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 426 posts
  • LocationTikonov

Posted 12 November 2012 - 08:16 PM

Head hitbox is simply code; they can make it larger or smaller regardless of the art. Look to the Atlas - big head, tiny hitbox.

That said... the cockpit being dead center mass is going to make this one to watch. Carefully.

#487 BUDFORCE

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 255 posts
  • LocationCambridgeshire, UK

Posted 14 November 2012 - 11:20 PM

Think I might have to get one of these, cool looking mech for sure.

#488 Stingray Productions

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,906 posts

Posted 14 November 2012 - 11:24 PM

Cataphract is awesome!

#489 Hellspont

    Rookie

  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 7 posts
  • LocationLake Elsinore CA

Posted 21 November 2012 - 09:49 AM

Head is real easy to hit. Makes a nice target.

#490 MorsMortis

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 99 posts
  • LocationLondon

Posted 21 November 2012 - 12:57 PM

Looks nice dies quick :0)

#491 xMEPHISTOx

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 1,396 posts

Posted 21 November 2012 - 09:55 PM

Very happy w/the Cata at this point, have not had any problems w/cockpit hitbox thus far.

#492 The Basilisk

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Mercenary
  • The Mercenary
  • 3,270 posts
  • LocationFrankfurt a.M.

Posted 23 November 2012 - 12:54 AM

Nice hardpoints, stupid weapons positioning.
In TT I like the Cathaphract, in MWO it is quite difficult to get its role.
Too vulnerable for a brawler due to its large flat torso with its easy to hit Cockpit, lowest arm weapon position of all mechs in the game, so unsuitable as a sniper, torso AC hardpoint in an stupid position much like the Atlas and last but not least due to its bulky proportions difficult to handle in the City.

#493 Xmador

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 121 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 23 November 2012 - 06:43 PM

Sweet looking mech, and I like the variants and customization options.

My only critique is that the scale is too small. A Centurion in game is taller than the Cataphract, but 20 pounds heavier, and the Cataphract looks to be as tall as a Catapult, and is 10 pounds heavier. Its a beefy looking mech when there's nothing standing next to it to compare it to, but when other mechs are standing around, it looks like one of those short little buff dudes suffering from Napoleon's syndrome trying to flex and look all hard.

#494 AllOuttaBubbleGum

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 157 posts

Posted 28 November 2012 - 05:30 AM

Quote

Too vulnerable for a brawler due to its large flat torso with its easy to hit Cockpit,

I agree. I've been getting the quickest kills on these guys. Close range and semi isolated they down quick to my ac20/srm6 group. And they are slow compared to a dragon(Hate shooting these when on full run).

Jump jets seem to help, as it make it harder to get a good solid hit on the torso/head area.





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users