According To The Forums, My Stalker Build Is Terrible, How Can I Improve It?
#81
Posted 03 January 2013 - 05:33 AM
#82
Posted 03 January 2013 - 01:15 PM
Joseph Mallan, on 03 January 2013 - 03:34 AM, said:
i was on the blue team fyi. and in case you didn't read the entire thread, it was tongue-in-cheek poking fun at some of the "common knowledge" flying around on the forum on how lousy my stalker build should be.
#83
Posted 03 January 2013 - 01:25 PM
Noodlesoup, on 02 January 2013 - 11:04 PM, said:
The screen shot means little... hate to break it to you and the people liking your post.....
Stalker with an XL engine is like admitting you have no clue about whats really going on. Anything works every once in awhile... if that's all you want then sure you're build is fine.... but play anyone decent and you're toast...
Also you didn't mention if you had help. Lots of builds put up good numbers if they have 3+ people padding them
#84
Posted 03 January 2013 - 01:29 PM
Noodlesoup, on 03 January 2013 - 01:15 PM, said:
i was on the blue team fyi. and in case you didn't read the entire thread, it was tongue-in-cheek poking fun at some of the "common knowledge" flying around on the forum on how lousy my stalker build should be.
It is pretty bad.... Not saying you can't do well with it.... but the well part is reliant on your enemies being idiots.
DV McKenna, on 03 January 2013 - 05:33 AM, said:
This is the dumb part.... most smart players are going to go for a side torso anyway.
#85
Posted 03 January 2013 - 01:29 PM
GioAvanti, on 03 January 2013 - 01:25 PM, said:
The screen shot means little... hate to break it to you and the people liking your post.....
Stalker with an XL engine is like admitting you have no clue about whats really going on. Anything works every once in awhile... if that's all you want then sure you're build is fine.... but play anyone decent and you're toast...
Also you didn't mention if you had help. Lots of builds put up good numbers if they have 3+ people padding them
i was running a solo-drop-pug. i had the normal amount of help (or lack thereof). and those screen captures are from yesterday. i'll admit that sometimes i do better than others and that my average runs closer to 600 damage done and 3 kills in a typical game. And if you'll check the capture again, the other teams are more than decent as they all average a good amount of damage and kills before i down them.
#86
Posted 03 January 2013 - 01:30 PM
Quote
Not really. It could also mean that you are simply willing to accept the reduced durability in the mech for the increased agility/firepower that you get with an XL.
It's the same tradeoff that you get with any XL equipped mech. And in the case of the Stalker, where you're probably using a decent sized engine, the tonnage you get for putting an XL in there is non-trivial.
If you are able to translate that tonnage into enough increased firepower that you make up for the reduction in durability, saying, "That's dumb" is a purely academic argument. Ultimately, what matters is how well your mech actually performs on the battlefield.
#87
Posted 03 January 2013 - 01:30 PM
GioAvanti, on 03 January 2013 - 01:29 PM, said:
It is pretty bad.... Not saying you can't do well with it.... but the well part is reliant on your enemies being idiots.
This is the dumb part.... most smart players are going to go for a side torso anyway.
i would be dumb to let them have my side torso without a fight.
#88
Posted 03 January 2013 - 01:41 PM
Noodlesoup, on 02 January 2013 - 10:58 PM, said:
edit: in the interest of full disclosure. my stalker also has 4xSRM6s and 2xSLs. it still overheats though.. what can i do?!
now post all the screens where you do 300 damage ^^
i had to laugh so loud... LL XL... well blind chicken... corn... all that kind of stuff and so on.. blablbalba
good players dont neet to brag on the forum... they just do eeeeeeet.
grow up get some pubics.
#89
Posted 03 January 2013 - 01:42 PM
Noodlesoup, on 03 January 2013 - 01:30 PM, said:
i would be dumb to let them have my side torso without a fight.
Yep.... unfortunately sometimes you won't have a choice and others the person will happily shoot your other side.
Extremely easy to hit a side torso on a stalker from the side also.
Also why do you even need an XL engine in the first place?
Edited by GioAvanti, 03 January 2013 - 01:48 PM.
#90
Posted 03 January 2013 - 01:49 PM
And while you're at it, drop the endo, take FF, it would be vastly superior for your purposes.
#91
Posted 03 January 2013 - 01:53 PM
This turns people OFF the game when the forums are this vexatious. Is the goal of these critics to ruin the game? Because that's what it sounds like. Their goal is to make players enjoy the game less. I mean there are a bunch of screen shots- are they ALL wrong? Are they ALL just the other team being idiots? How is this player determining the exact composition of the other team 100% of the time? Are you accusing him/her of hacks?
#92
Posted 03 January 2013 - 01:55 PM
Roland, on 03 January 2013 - 01:30 PM, said:
It's the same tradeoff that you get with any XL equipped mech. And in the case of the Stalker, where you're probably using a decent sized engine, the tonnage you get for putting an XL in there is non-trivial.
If you are able to translate that tonnage into enough increased firepower that you make up for the reduction in durability, saying, "That's dumb" is a purely academic argument. Ultimately, what matters is how well your mech actually performs on the battlefield.
Honestly... it is rather stupid.
Why?
Pro: You get more damage (subjective.... btw due to heat and other load outs actually putting out more alpha dmg)
Pro: Better speed (last guy I talked to bragged he was going 65 kph with his xl engine)
Con: Major loss in durability (compounded by the mech's body)
Con: 6 critical slots lost (which are really needed for heat sinks)
Simply put: The pros you get are weak pros and the cons are nasty as hell.
#93
Posted 03 January 2013 - 01:57 PM
GioAvanti, on 03 January 2013 - 01:55 PM, said:
Honestly... it is rather stupid.
Why?
Pro: You get more damage (subjective.... btw due to heat and other load outs actually putting out more alpha dmg)
Pro: Better speed (last guy I talked to bragged he was going 65 kph with his xl engine)
Con: Major loss in durability (compounded by the mech's body)
Con: 6 critical slots lost (which are really needed for heat sinks)
Simply put: The pros you get are weak pros and the cons are nasty as hell.
Honestly, it depends on your design and intent for the mech.
I agree in pug games its pretty daft, 8v8's not so much...but like i say it depends on your intent.
#94
Posted 03 January 2013 - 01:58 PM
PaintedWolf, on 03 January 2013 - 01:53 PM, said:
This turns people OFF the game when the forums are this vexatious. Is the goal of these critics to ruin the game? Because that's what it sounds like. Their goal is to make players enjoy the game less. I mean there are a bunch of screen shots- are they ALL wrong? Are they ALL just the other team being idiots? How is this player determining the exact composition of the other team 100% of the time? Are you accusing him/her of hacks?
Please don't derp: Anyone can selectively grab SS's and yes there are a ton of idiots playing the game. A premade can also help him inflate his numbers for the lulz and troll post on the forums.
And honestly his post hurts newbies because they'll think this works and then someone with half a brain with kill them in a few seconds and they will rage quit.
#95
Posted 03 January 2013 - 01:59 PM
Volume, on 03 January 2013 - 01:49 PM, said:
And while you're at it, drop the endo, take FF, it would be vastly superior for your purposes.
What you need to do is stop criticizing someone who is performing superbly. Obviously the "XL Engines are NEVER EVER a good idea on a Brawler EVER NO MATTER WHAT" arguments are wrong.
And it does not take --too-- much imagination to see why that would be.
1- The enemy does not know you have an XL.
2- Lose R-L Torso and 9/10 times you are ready to die anyways.
3- The extra-firepower/armor/speed are benefits that can outweigh the XL Engine being on the Brawler.
4- Brawler gets to the battlefield faster- and will soon Torso Twist faster to boot.
5- Extra-Armor = less risk of an ammo explosion.
6- Engine can crit sink to help avoid an ammo explosion.
Also this is not a pure brawler- the Large Lasers make it so the Mech can ALSO fight at range. All these points might not mean much if presented by themselves without any evidence, but with the screen shots one should at least start to question the assumptions of this particular group.
#96
Posted 03 January 2013 - 01:59 PM
DV McKenna, on 03 January 2013 - 01:57 PM, said:
Honestly, it depends on your design and intent for the mech.
I agree in pug games its pretty daft, 8v8's not so much...but like i say it depends on your intent.
Oh if he stood on a hill and just sniped with the lasers then the XL engine isn't so bad.... issue is that again requires some serious stupidity on the enemy team.
#97
Posted 03 January 2013 - 02:02 PM
And the stubborness these critics are showing is just making me question their judgment in general. I mean, now I wonder if a Brawler might be better with an XL- just because these people have missed the obvious point for 5+ pages and a dozen+ posts.
#98
Posted 03 January 2013 - 02:04 PM
GioAvanti, on 03 January 2013 - 01:42 PM, said:
Yep.... unfortunately sometimes you won't have a choice and others the person will happily shoot your other side.
Extremely easy to hit a side torso on a stalker from the side also.
Also why do you even need an XL engine in the first place?
so i can fit more guns =D duh.
Volume, on 03 January 2013 - 01:49 PM, said:
And while you're at it, drop the endo, take FF, it would be vastly superior for your purposes.
should i also load extra BAP and go with 5 tons of AMS ammo "just in case"?
#100
Posted 03 January 2013 - 02:06 PM
8 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 8 guests, 0 anonymous users