Vxheous Kerensky, on 01 February 2015 - 10:29 AM, said:
after a short reread you are right, but as for my view of whether it is political or religious stands, why go through all of that to preserve the legacy of a soldier. I am not looking at what being blood named does for the person, but the act of blood naming warriors in general. the entire thing looks like and feels like a way to immortalize their ancestors, effectively keeping them alive past death, which falls into religious territory