

R&r
#1
Posted 17 February 2013 - 01:54 AM
from what i understand, it was due to the free rearm of 75% ammo without having to buy more?
what is so hard about, pay to fix what is destroyed/damaged. pay to rearm all ammo up to 100%. you get NO CHOICE in the matter. it is a cost you have accept.
i say, if your fusion engine erupts, it is "bye, bye mech, go buy another." if you jetcan yourself out before that happens, you get a repair bill based on the damage at the time of jettison, that bill is even higher if you lose the match. gonna be tough getting your mech back from enemy controlled territory.
i can go on and on about how R&R can work in this game, but i am more interested in EXACTLY why it is not coming back.
#2
Posted 17 February 2013 - 01:58 AM
I'm with you though. I prefer R&R.
There's more info if you do a forum search.
#3
Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:05 AM
Immelmann, on 17 February 2013 - 01:54 AM, said:
Believe me when I say I'm glad you're not a Dev. Really really glad. Phew.
#4
Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:06 AM
You should think about its impact before you post!
#5
Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:08 AM
#7
Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:09 AM
Alistair Winter, on 17 February 2013 - 01:58 AM, said:
I'm with you though. I prefer R&R.
There's more info if you do a forum search.
This. I always repaired and rearmed fully, even when I ran a serious loss (artemis and xl combo's normally), but a lot of players just used the 75% and proved to be a liability to whichever team they dropped in. I'd like it brought back, but only in a way which makes players pay the full bill.
#8
Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:10 AM
#9
Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:10 AM
#10
Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:11 AM
Volume, on 17 February 2013 - 02:09 AM, said:

Nope, too damn casual for spreadsheet online.
RoninV3, on 17 February 2013 - 02:10 AM, said:
You haven't a clue why they took out R&R, do you?
Edited by Thirdstar, 17 February 2013 - 02:12 AM.
#11
Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:12 AM
Thirdstar, on 17 February 2013 - 02:05 AM, said:
Believe me when I say I'm glad you're not a Dev. Really really glad. Phew.
hmmph :-)
WolvesX, on 17 February 2013 - 02:06 AM, said:
i believe it is YOU that needs to do the rethinking.
Volume, on 17 February 2013 - 02:09 AM, said:

now this guy KNOWS where i am coming from! +1
gave up eve for mwo
Edited by Immelmann, 17 February 2013 - 02:16 AM.
#13
Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:16 AM
Captain Midnight, on 17 February 2013 - 02:10 AM, said:
see what you are saying, but i think that what you describe gives us a very inaccurate measure of who used what or how much. if i only use say 100 rnds of lrm ammo, and the other guy uses 1000 rnds of lrm ammo, by what you say, we both pay an equal amount. not sure if that is exactly what happens, but it sounds plausable.
#14
Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:19 AM
RoninV3, on 17 February 2013 - 02:10 AM, said:
R&R mattered only in a campaign. As there is no campaign in MWO there is no need for R&R.
#15
Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:19 AM
Captain Midnight, on 17 February 2013 - 02:10 AM, said:
It's a bit more complicated than that, like the part where people made negative income, and some made 58295958257525k dollars per game.
#16
Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:30 AM
As long as a looser in an high tech 3l or a group of loosers with ts and in close formation can shoot every thing else in that Game repair costs would ruine my Game Exeperience to the moment i buy a ****** raven 3l and get TS and a extra hard Gang to run with. And after doing all that i will drop the game coz i dont want to be in such a gang or pilot a ***** Wagon or be forced by comunity or Game Mechanics to pilot the strongest ride with homing cotton wool and **** free players ******** style like it is these days.
having high hopes in the devs to solve the real problems this game got.
#17
Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:36 AM
#18
Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:36 AM
#19
Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:38 AM
#20
Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:46 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users