Jump to content

R&r


291 replies to this topic

Poll: R&R (415 member(s) have cast votes)

should R&R be reinstated?

  1. yes (174 votes [41.93%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 41.93%

  2. no (241 votes [58.07%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 58.07%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Max Immelmann

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 568 posts
  • LocationPA

Posted 17 February 2013 - 01:54 AM

rearm and repair. i still do not fully understand why this will not be reinstated.

from what i understand, it was due to the free rearm of 75% ammo without having to buy more?

what is so hard about, pay to fix what is destroyed/damaged. pay to rearm all ammo up to 100%. you get NO CHOICE in the matter. it is a cost you have accept.

i say, if your fusion engine erupts, it is "bye, bye mech, go buy another." if you jetcan yourself out before that happens, you get a repair bill based on the damage at the time of jettison, that bill is even higher if you lose the match. gonna be tough getting your mech back from enemy controlled territory.

i can go on and on about how R&R can work in this game, but i am more interested in EXACTLY why it is not coming back.

#2 Alistair Winter

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Storm
  • Storm
  • 10,823 posts
  • LocationBergen, Norway, FRR

Posted 17 February 2013 - 01:58 AM

Because most people didn't like it, pretty much. PGI listened to the fans.

I'm with you though. I prefer R&R.

There's more info if you do a forum search.

#3 Thirdstar

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,728 posts
  • LocationIndia

Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:05 AM

View PostImmelmann, on 17 February 2013 - 01:54 AM, said:

i say, if your fusion engine erupts, it is "bye, bye mech, go buy another." if you jetcan yourself out before that happens, you get a repair bill based on the damage at the time of jettison, that bill is even higher if you lose the match. gonna be tough getting your mech back from enemy controlled territory.


Believe me when I say I'm glad you're not a Dev. Really really glad. Phew.

#4 WolvesX

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Machete
  • The Machete
  • 2,072 posts

Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:06 AM

R&R is bad.

You should think about its impact before you post!

#5 Thorn Hallis

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,902 posts
  • LocationUnited States of Paranoia

Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:08 AM

It served no purpose. So no.

#6 Volume

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Privateer
  • The Privateer
  • 1,097 posts

Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:09 AM

View PostThirdstar, on 17 February 2013 - 02:05 AM, said:


Believe me when I say I'm glad you're not a Dev. Really really glad. Phew.


What, never played EVE Online? :D

#7 Alymbic

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 600 posts
  • LocationSpace Australia

Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:09 AM

View PostAlistair Winter, on 17 February 2013 - 01:58 AM, said:

Because most people didn't like it, pretty much. PGI listened to the fans.

I'm with you though. I prefer R&R.

There's more info if you do a forum search.


This. I always repaired and rearmed fully, even when I ran a serious loss (artemis and xl combo's normally), but a lot of players just used the 75% and proved to be a liability to whichever team they dropped in. I'd like it brought back, but only in a way which makes players pay the full bill.

#8 RoninV3

    Member

  • PipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 46 posts
  • LocationNorth America, Terra

Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:10 AM

Thats a shame, the R&R aspect of a Battletech/Mechwarrior table top game was dealing with those aspects and made the game unique and enjoyable. The way they have it now its just like WoW, who cares if you die Respawn and play new game. Whereas in a R&R enviroment players would not be just running out blazing for glory, they would use "shockingly" real world parameters to guide their actions. This would eliminate the AFK farmers that I have seen popping up as well. More importantly as the back of the old Mercenaries handbok used to say "Variety is the spice of battle"

#9 Captain Midnight

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 657 posts

Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:10 AM

R&R already is 100%, and it's already mandatory. They garnish the R&R costs right out of your wages, so instead of getting a bunch of money and having to pay a bunch of money back, you only get some money but you get to keep it all.

#10 Thirdstar

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,728 posts
  • LocationIndia

Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:11 AM

View PostVolume, on 17 February 2013 - 02:09 AM, said:

What, never played EVE Online? :D


Nope, too damn casual for spreadsheet online.

View PostRoninV3, on 17 February 2013 - 02:10 AM, said:

This would eliminate the AFK farmers that I have seen popping up as well. More importantly as the back of the old Mercenaries handbok used to say "Variety is the spice of battle"


You haven't a clue why they took out R&R, do you?

Edited by Thirdstar, 17 February 2013 - 02:12 AM.


#11 Max Immelmann

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 568 posts
  • LocationPA

Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:12 AM

View PostThirdstar, on 17 February 2013 - 02:05 AM, said:


Believe me when I say I'm glad you're not a Dev. Really really glad. Phew.


hmmph :-)

View PostWolvesX, on 17 February 2013 - 02:06 AM, said:

You should think about its impact before you post!


i believe it is YOU that needs to do the rethinking.

View PostVolume, on 17 February 2013 - 02:09 AM, said:

What, never played EVE Online? :D


now this guy KNOWS where i am coming from! +1



gave up eve for mwo

Edited by Immelmann, 17 February 2013 - 02:16 AM.


#12 Thirdstar

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,728 posts
  • LocationIndia

Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:13 AM

View PostImmelmann, on 17 February 2013 - 02:12 AM, said:

gave up eve for mwo


Yeah, no. This never happened.

#13 Max Immelmann

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 568 posts
  • LocationPA

Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:16 AM

View PostCaptain Midnight, on 17 February 2013 - 02:10 AM, said:

R&R already is 100%, and it's already mandatory. They garnish the R&R costs right out of your wages, so instead of getting a bunch of money and having to pay a bunch of money back, you only get some money but you get to keep it all.


see what you are saying, but i think that what you describe gives us a very inaccurate measure of who used what or how much. if i only use say 100 rnds of lrm ammo, and the other guy uses 1000 rnds of lrm ammo, by what you say, we both pay an equal amount. not sure if that is exactly what happens, but it sounds plausable.

#14 Thorn Hallis

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,902 posts
  • LocationUnited States of Paranoia

Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:19 AM

View PostRoninV3, on 17 February 2013 - 02:10 AM, said:

Thats a shame, the R&R aspect of a Battletech/Mechwarrior table top game was dealing with those aspects and made the game unique and enjoyable. The way they have it now its just like WoW, who cares if you die Respawn and play new game. Whereas in a R&R enviroment players would not be just running out blazing for glory, they would use "shockingly" real world parameters to guide their actions. This would eliminate the AFK farmers that I have seen popping up as well. More importantly as the back of the old Mercenaries handbok used to say "Variety is the spice of battle"


R&R mattered only in a campaign. As there is no campaign in MWO there is no need for R&R.

#15 Vassago Rain

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • Bridesmaid
  • 14,396 posts
  • LocationExodus fleet, HMS Kong Circumflex accent

Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:19 AM

View PostCaptain Midnight, on 17 February 2013 - 02:10 AM, said:

R&R already is 100%, and it's already mandatory. They garnish the R&R costs right out of your wages, so instead of getting a bunch of money and having to pay a bunch of money back, you only get some money but you get to keep it all.


It's a bit more complicated than that, like the part where people made negative income, and some made 58295958257525k dollars per game.

#16 MechWarrior001347

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 181 posts

Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:30 AM

Look at the Balancing and think again.
As long as a looser in an high tech 3l or a group of loosers with ts and in close formation can shoot every thing else in that Game repair costs would ruine my Game Exeperience to the moment i buy a ****** raven 3l and get TS and a extra hard Gang to run with. And after doing all that i will drop the game coz i dont want to be in such a gang or pilot a ***** Wagon or be forced by comunity or Game Mechanics to pilot the strongest ride with homing cotton wool and **** free players ******** style like it is these days.

having high hopes in the devs to solve the real problems this game got.

#17 Kaspirikay

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Giant Helper
  • 2,050 posts

Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:36 AM

Re: permanent death. Its the reason why i stopped playing eve and started here. Its more frustrating than fun. Especially whenyou DC and die because of that.

#18 Remorse

    Member

  • PipPip
  • 28 posts

Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:36 AM

Also eve-online has a pve driven economy where most of the profits come from pve and only a little bit from pvp salvage. This game has no npcs to be killed milion times over and over to salvage them over and over. Without alternate income source most people would be out of any mech pretty soon.

#19 Kabum

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Fury
  • Fury
  • 62 posts

Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:38 AM

R&R will only scare MOST of the people out of the game. It will help to keep some Harcore & sado players in but will do more damage than good.

#20 Ter Ushaka

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 600 posts
  • LocationGnomeregan, Dun Morogh

Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:46 AM

I could see R&R coming back as a function of community warfare, but at the present it doesn't serve a purpose.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users