Thunderbolt And Shadowhawk Size Comparison Screenshots
#21
Posted 12 October 2013 - 01:13 AM
I've searched and couldn't find their source, was it from a early stream?
#22
Posted 12 October 2013 - 02:47 AM
Phil put up some teaser shots for us near the end.
Edited by Kaylos Thex, 12 October 2013 - 02:48 AM.
#23
Posted 12 October 2013 - 05:29 AM
Thanks!
#24
Posted 12 October 2013 - 05:41 AM
Edited by Spheroid, 12 October 2013 - 06:00 AM.
#25
Posted 12 October 2013 - 06:07 AM
Spheroid, on 12 October 2013 - 05:41 AM, said:
Nope, Kintaro or less in size (just slightly higher than a Cent).
Quickdraw...
Man, either you have no idea how big that one is, or have some severe miscalculations in that height theorem of yours.
#26
Posted 12 October 2013 - 06:16 AM
Spheroid, on 12 October 2013 - 05:41 AM, said:
Perspective doesn't work the way you think that it does. Moving something "downward" moves it closer to the camera (at least in the case of this image). Doing this without resizing the Jenner would make it appear smaller than it is (and even Shadowhawk appear larger).
Edit: pressed post too early
Edited by Asyres, 12 October 2013 - 06:19 AM.
#27
Posted 12 October 2013 - 06:18 AM
Thunderbolt
Locust
Shadow Hawk
Battlemaster
- Locust seems fine
- Battlemaster seems fine
- Thunderbold is wider but less tall than a centurion, I like it, it looks very compact and brutal that way
- Shadow Hawk is taller than a Centurion
- Shadow Hawk is taller than a Cataphract! WTF?
The Shadow HAwk is WAY to big imho!
Edited by Bromineberry, 12 October 2013 - 06:25 AM.
#28
Posted 12 October 2013 - 06:23 AM
Asyres, on 12 October 2013 - 06:16 AM, said:
Edit: pressed post too early
No, you scale the Jenner bigger and closer over the Shadow Hawk then once it is scaled you move the layer adjacent. I know how to approach it. Feel free to visually argue your point. I don't mean to move the image before it is resized.
Edited by Spheroid, 12 October 2013 - 06:33 AM.
#29
Posted 12 October 2013 - 06:27 AM
#30
Posted 12 October 2013 - 06:27 AM
Bromineberry, on 12 October 2013 - 06:18 AM, said:
Thunderbolt
Locust
Shadow Hawk
Battlemaster
- Locust seems fine
- Battlemaster seems fine
- Thunderbold is wider but less tall than a centurion, I like it, it looks very compact and brutal that way
- Shadow Hawk is taller than a Centurion
- Shadow Hawk is taller than a Cataphract! WTF?
The Shadow HAwk is WAY to big imho!
Uh oh:
Damnit, I got my hopes up for nothin'. Business as usual, nothing to see here. Medium mech scaling working as intended.
Edited by FupDup, 12 October 2013 - 06:30 AM.
#31
Posted 12 October 2013 - 06:31 AM
#33
Posted 12 October 2013 - 06:37 AM
You guys seem to have no problem making lights tiny, why do you insist on turning mediums into behemoths?
#34
Posted 12 October 2013 - 06:42 AM
Shawk:
The Shadow Hawk is slightly taller than the Kintaro. GG close.
Edited by FupDup, 12 October 2013 - 06:42 AM.
#35
Posted 12 October 2013 - 06:46 AM
Shadowhawk isn't nearly as wide as the cataphract at least.
#36
Posted 12 October 2013 - 06:53 AM
But, I'm still rockin' the Trebuchet's and I see enough Kintaro's around, ShadowHawk should be fine.
#37
Posted 12 October 2013 - 06:58 AM
#38
Posted 12 October 2013 - 07:15 AM
#39
Posted 12 October 2013 - 07:18 AM
One would think that at least, when they're actively working on a bunch of mechs together - the Phoenix mechs - that they could get the scaling right. Nope. They don't.
So what is it? Incompetence? Ignorance? Or is there actual thought behind it? I can hardly believe it...
#40
Posted 12 October 2013 - 07:19 AM
GODzillaGSPB, on 12 October 2013 - 07:18 AM, said:
One would think that at least, when they're actively working on a bunch of mechs together - the Phoenix mechs - that they could get the scaling right. Nope. They don't.
So what is it? Incompetence? Ignorance? Or is there actual thought behind it? I can hardly believe it...
It's deliberate thought. They obey the TT bible when it comes to scaling things 40+ tons.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users