Jump to content

Why We Can't Have Nice Debates - Player Archetypes In Mwo


159 replies to this topic

#1 1453 R

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • Bridesmaid
  • 5,579 posts

Posted 24 June 2014 - 01:24 PM

All right, this has gotten out of hand.

In large part due to the horrible miscarriage of conversation in this thread right here (and because that thread moves at lightning speed and I've long since lost track of it), I’m going to engage in a fruitless endeavor here and try to bridge the gap in viewpoints between the two sides that have once again arisen in this debate (‘scrubs’ vs. ‘tryhards’), since it is also my firm belief that a fundamental break in understanding is responsible for not only the vitriol in Heim’s thread, but for much of the vitriol between Scrubs and Tryhards everywhere.

First of all, a highly, highly relevant pair of articles:
Timmy, Jonny, Spike
TVTropes on Player Archetypes (pursuant to TJS, above)

Read those. They’re important.

.

..



Back? Good.

Now. The reason you read all that is because there is no such thing as a scrub, and no such thing as a tryhard. What you’re talking about are Timmies and Spikes respectively, and the reason these two can never see eye to eye is because they want completely different things out of the game. I'm going to tell you what those things are, try and break down what each side is actually trying to get out of any given match of MWO, and then maybe - just maybe - we can start moving beyond Scrubs and Tryhards and get to the work of actually helping to fix the game?

The Competitive View: Spikes in MWO

Players like Heim, Adiuvo, and literally everyone else in the RHoD tournament are primarily Spikes. They’re in the game to win it – not because they hate fun, hate originality, and hate you, but because to a Spike, the most satisfying portion of the game – the best and most entertaining fun – is to demonstrate mastery. They want to be the very best, like no one ever was.

A Spike does not have any real emotional attachment to or personal investment in his ‘Mechs, the way a Timmy or Jonny does. They’re tools to Spike, a means by which the real important part of the game – his own personal skill, knowledge, and ability, and the combined talent of the team he surrounds himself with – can be put to the test. Spikes buy the Dragon Slayer because it’s an optimal chassis – they didn’t give it a cool name when they bought it, and they didn’t bother with zippy colors to put on it either. The ‘Mech is unimportant save as a means by which the player’s mastery of the game can be demonstrated – it’s why you hear ultracomp-bracket players talk about specific pilots in their games rather than specific ‘Mech designs or weapon systems. In their section of the game, what you play is not even remotely important. It’s who you play, both with and against, how good they are, and what that says about your own talents and abilities.

A Spike can’t put away the poptarts and run ‘what’s fun’ any more than a Timmy can put away his mixed-armaments Battlemaster and run ‘what’s good’ – to a Spike, a ‘Mech such as a 6xSL, 1xLL, AC/10, LRM-5 Battlemaster interferes tremendously with his own abilities and denies him the chance to show how good he is. It’s not fun to pilot a poorly optimized ‘Mech. He’s better than you are in such a ‘Mech, but being better than his opponent is only really tangentially important to most Spikes. They want to be the best they can be, and to do that they use the best tools the game gives them and fight the best opponents they can turn up. Anything less, and there’s just no point to it, no improvement, no mastery.

Spikes exist at all skill levels, but the ones at the top catch a lot of flak in many online games because their in-it-to-win-it nature, by necessity, makes them rather insular – you don’t see top-end Spikes in the general game population because there’s nothing of interest to them in the general game population. They’re divorced from the issues of the so-called ‘Steering Wheel Underhive’ (nice one by the way, ultracomp guys – what a great way to ensure that everyone else hates you even more than they already do), and tend to see the problems or issues of the general populace as petty and significantly less important than they’re made out to be.

These are the proponents of top-down balance, and they don’t particularly care if the play experience on the way to the top is fun or not or if the game has any kind of new player retention, training, or tutorials. In the eyes of an ultracomp Spike, nothing matters beneath the highest levels of competition. If you’re not playing to win, and to be the best you can be, then it shouldn’t matter to you what you’re using or how good it is/isn’t. Play whatever you like, do however you do in it, and let the game do whatever. If you don’t like it, there’s a solution already built into the game, and that solution is Git Gud, Son. If you don’t want to Git Gud, then there’s no reason the game should pander to your badness – you already have all the tools you need to deal with your problem yourself, why should the devs compromise top-level performance for you?


Party Night: Timmies in MWO

Now for the other side of things. Nothing drives a Spike crazy faster than trying to argue with a Timmy (as you’ve no doubt noticed, just a time or two, here on the forums), because the Timmy doesn’t care about the Spike’s demonstrated mastery of the game. A Timmy does not give the remotest flap that the House of Lords won the Beta Invitiational. The rankings, leaderboards and other competitive standings tools that Spikes use to measure themselves against their peers are all so much smoke to Timmies. They don’t care, they can’t care. It’s not in their make-up to bother with all that stuff, because that stuff isn’t part of the game to them.

A Timmy’s in the game for the experience of it. He’s in it for the AWESOME. They’re in the game for that one match in twenty where all the stars align and that crazy Battlemaster I laid out above goes hog-wild and pulls down 600 damage and four kills, because that is by God a match to remember! Timmies put lines in their signature commemorating that game where they were in a legged Cicada and yet still managed to kill two Cataphracts and a Stalker before losing to base cap (I’m a Jonny/Spike rather than a Timmy, but c’mon – we all have a little Timmy in us somewhere, right next to our Captain). Timmy is in the game to play the game – he wants to take his big stompy robot out and shoot at other people’s big stompy robots, he wants to laugh and BS with his friends while he does it, and he may very well have a drink or two at his side when he’s at it.

A Timmy’s ‘Mechs are his buddies. They’re good friends he’s had good times with; he has stories for each of them. They have snazzy paint jobs, awesome names, and the thought of selling one is usually pretty painful for a Timmy once he’s decided he likes a given ‘Mech. He wants his ‘Mechs to have personality, character, and most of all he wants them to be AWESOME, because AWESOME matches can only be had in AWESOME ‘Mechs. Whether or not they’re actual Awesomes is another story – but Timmies are the most likely candidates for the cockpits of any Awesomes out there, because c’mon, let’s face it – how can it not be awesome if it’s literally named the Awesome?!

Timmies can and do chime in on gameplay balance, to the eternal frustration of Spikes, because a 12-2 rollover is not awesome, regardless of which side of it the Timmy’s on. If something is way out of whack, to the point where it’s ruining matches and making it difficult for Timmy to find those matches where he can do his thing and enjoy the thrill of a really awesome game, then he’s going to go and try to get the devs to fix it so he can get back to finding the awesome. ‘Gitting Gud’ is not a solution for Timmy, because Gitting Gud is not awesome. In a Timmy’s eyes, any two-bit jackwad can slap two PPCs and two AC/5s on a Dragon Slayer and Git Gud – but winning matches that way is boring as snot and completely not worth the Timmy’s time, money, and effort.

Timmies, obviously, don’t care about balance at the highest levels. They don’t necessarily want to impede it, just as Spikes don’t actively want to impede the lower-level play experience, but if the game is a torturous slog to play up until one Gits Gud, then the game has nothing to offer Timmy and he’ll leave. The public queue play experience is all Timmy cares about – the ultracomp leagues aren’t even worth watching or paying attention to. If he wants to watch a bunch of mechanical pogo sticks jump out of boxes and try to potshot each other to death, he’ll drag two Whack-A-Mole machines next to each other and give them Nerf guns.

To put it in the most succinct, oversimplified TL;DR manner as possible: Spikes don’t remember/care about the match, they remember the result of that match, because the result is what proves the capabilities of the players therein. Timmies don’t remember/care about the result of a match, they remember the match itself. Because it was awesome.


Man in the Middle: Jonnies in MWO

This section is going to be shorter, because the Jonnies are much easier to explain and also because they’re often the mediators between Timmies and Spikes, since a Jonny is in many ways a blending of the Timmy and Spike mentalities. And also because they’re not really important to the discussion at hand, but damnit I’ma write it anyways.

A Spike wishes to demonstrate mastery. A Timmy wishes to find the AWESOME. A Jonny, on the other hand, wishes to demonstrate mastery of AWESOME. We’re the schmucks going out there in Dragons trying to buttstab you to death, the schlamiles in 385XL Victors with AC/20s (pre-Giganerf, anyways) doing the same thing we did in Dragons but with more armor and jump jets. We’re the ones trying to get Spike to stop lobbying for kill-it-now Timber Wolf nerfs because the Timber Wolf is one of the most insanely versatile ‘Mechs in existence, and thus a perfect tool for Jonny. Jonnies take meta chassis and give them non-meta armaments, or take non-meta chassis and try unique, nearly-but-not-quite meta armaments on them, because a Jonny’s desire is to win with style.

Winning with the bog-standard ultracomp meta Dragon Slayer is no win at all for a Jonny. Our ‘Mechs are pieces of ourselves – the ‘Mechlab is our real test, beating the meta is our cause. Koniving is likely the most well-known Jonny on the board – he has ALL the ‘Mechs, and he’s constantly looking for new ways to use bad ‘Mechs in new, surprisingly good ways. And then making videos of it. To put it simply, a Jonny is one who is inclined to try and Git Gud, but on his terms rather than the metas. Some players end up seeing Jonny-type players as the champions of both the Timmy and the Spike causes – Timmies see Jonnies as Crusaders For Justice, spitting in the meta’s eye and winning games regardless of the fact that they’re using so-called ‘terribad builds’ (we don’t, actually – or at least not with any expectation of success. We’re just more flexible in how we define success than a Spike, and more willing to accept a loss provided we learn from it), while Spikes see (top-end) Jonnies as the guys who create the meta in the first place. Somebody has to conceive the top-end meta builds in the first place, and it’s usually the rare ultracomp Jonny/Spike who does so.

NOW.

Why did you just read three and a half pages of this crap?

Because Timmy can’t solve Spike’s problems, Spike can’t solve Timmy’s, and both sets of problems are equally valid. Neither side can truly grok the other’s desires; each can only see what the behaviors of the other mean to someone on their own side of the game. To a Spike, Timmies are Scrubs – a bunch of no-talent idjits with no skill, no understanding, and no basis for opinion. The Timmy’s issues don’t matter to the real point of the game, and half his problems could be solved by simply Gitting Gud.

And to a Timmy, Spikes are Tryhards – those puffed-up, full-of-themselves jerkbags who’re constantly, constantly, constantly trying to take the AWESOME out of the game. They have no appreciation for the wild, glorious chaos of a truly AWESOME match, and if they bring up their tournament history one more time as some weak, misguided justification for trying to de-AWESOME the game Timmy’s going to punch him straight in the dong.

What you all need to do is remember that people are fundamentally different. There are no such things as scrubs, and no such things as tryhards. Try to see any issue you’re weighing in on from the viewpoint of all sides, and if you can’t do that, then at least remember that there are other viewpoints beyond your own, and the guys who see from them are your fellow MWO players as much as anyone else is.

Well. Unless the guy’s one of those N.O.P.E. hipsters. In that case, let ‘em have it, Charlie.

*has discovered that the MWO forum administrators are bassholes who've disabled the ability to reserve the first post after the OP for additional clarifications/comments down the line. Stop merging my posts, you jerks!*

Edited by 1453 R, 24 June 2014 - 01:24 PM.


#2 Joseph Mallan

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 35,216 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationMallanhold, Furillo

Posted 24 June 2014 - 01:26 PM

This was posted before... What is funny is, My first name IS Timothy! and you can tell that I am a Timmy player style!



Don't let my mom read that from Heaven! We went round and round once I hit 6' that I wasn't her "little" Timmy any more! Even more so once I got back from Marine Infantry Training School! :)

There just isn't anything Little about me.
Posted Image

I have a hint of Johnny as well though.

Edited by Joseph Mallan, 24 June 2014 - 01:30 PM.


#3 1453 R

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • Bridesmaid
  • 5,579 posts

Posted 24 June 2014 - 01:27 PM

Test.

DAMNIT JOE, YOU BEAT ME TO IT. Oh well. Nobody needs a comments post anyways. Q_Q

Also:

View PostJoseph Mallan, on 24 June 2014 - 01:26 PM, said:

This was posted before...


Clearly it didn't take. Time to try again, hm?

Edited by 1453 R, 24 June 2014 - 01:29 PM.


#4 A Man In A Can

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,594 posts
  • LocationRetired

Posted 24 June 2014 - 01:31 PM

Good read. 10/10 :)

#5 xMEPHISTOx

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 1,396 posts

Posted 24 June 2014 - 01:32 PM

View Post1453 R, on 24 June 2014 - 01:24 PM, said:

Posted Image


Posted Image

All joking aside, your points are valid for the most part. :)

Edited by xMEPHISTOx, 24 June 2014 - 01:32 PM.


#6 Corbenik

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Fallen
  • The Fallen
  • 1,115 posts

Posted 24 June 2014 - 01:37 PM

For a sec I thought the title of the thread was "why we can't have"
Spoiler


#7 Joseph Mallan

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 35,216 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationMallanhold, Furillo

Posted 24 June 2014 - 01:41 PM

View Post1453 R, on 24 June 2014 - 01:27 PM, said:

Test.

DAMNIT JOE, YOU BEAT ME TO IT. Oh well. Nobody needs a comments post anyways. Q_Q

Also:



Clearly it didn't take. Time to try again, hm?

Just so long as the Johnny's and Spike's don't try to stop Timmy's from playing I will be happy!

#8 xMEPHISTOx

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 1,396 posts

Posted 24 June 2014 - 01:42 PM

Posted Image

#9 FupDup

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 26,888 posts
  • LocationThe Keeper of Memes

Posted 24 June 2014 - 01:42 PM

View PostxMEPHISTOx, on 24 June 2014 - 01:42 PM, said:

Posted Image



#10 xMEPHISTOx

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 1,396 posts

Posted 24 June 2014 - 01:43 PM

^^^Lawls. :)

#11 Egomane

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,163 posts

Posted 24 June 2014 - 01:47 PM

How about we stop putting other players into archetypes and just call them players. No Timmy, Spike, Scrub or Tryhard. Only players! Because in the end, that is what we are.

#12 Joseph Mallan

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 35,216 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationMallanhold, Furillo

Posted 24 June 2014 - 01:49 PM

View PostEgomane, on 24 June 2014 - 01:47 PM, said:

How about we stop putting other players into archetypes and just call them players. No Timmy, Spike, Scrub or Tryhard. Only players! Because in the end, that is what we are.

As a people we have to classify everything... you are asking way to much from us. :)

#13 Mystere

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 22,783 posts
  • LocationClassified

Posted 24 June 2014 - 01:49 PM



#14 GreyGriffin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 792 posts
  • LocationQuatre Belle (originally from Lum)

Posted 24 June 2014 - 01:50 PM

What about Vorthos..?

#15 1453 R

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • Bridesmaid
  • 5,579 posts

Posted 24 June 2014 - 01:52 PM

View PostEgomane, on 24 June 2014 - 01:47 PM, said:

How about we stop putting other players into archetypes and just call them players. No Timmy, Spike, Scrub or Tryhard. Only players! Because in the end, that is what we are.


A noble idea, but one which does not actually help. Labels are only bad if they're false, or if the other guy insists on overly narrow definitions of someone because of a label.

Timmy/Jonny/Spike is a way to understand what players want out of a game, where their suggestions for balance or other corrections are coming from, and what the end result they want to get to is. My understanding of player psychographics, basic and 101-level though it may be, has honestly helped me quite a bit in understanding the arguments and debate platforms of players such as the House of Lords guys and other ultra-competitive guys, whose lack of investment in their machines and disregard for the style or personal flair of their victories was utterly, utterly foreign to me until I started doing some research.

All I want to do is share the fruits of that research and understanding, man. I have no problems with Timmies or Spikes, but I do have a problem with players calling other players scrubs or tryhards and reducing what might've otherwise been a good discussion into a mudslinging contest.


View PostGreyGriffin, on 24 June 2014 - 01:50 PM, said:

What about Vorthos..?


That's where you get guys like CWDG and other roleplayers forming lore-appropriate units. Also, as is stated in said article, completely unrelated to one's Timmyness or Spikeosity :)

Edited by 1453 R, 24 June 2014 - 01:54 PM.


#16 CeeKay Boques

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 3,371 posts
  • LocationYes

Posted 24 June 2014 - 01:55 PM

I can't deny it.

I love the competitive nature of this game. I'm avoiding uniting up because I love it so much.

But when someone brings out DPS charts and uses all the words that heimdlight did... I look at that as a complete ruination of what I love.

You want to talk tactics, you want to talk strategy, man I'm there! You want to only take 3 Mech types in a game with 60 on your team? Ruination!!

View PostEgomane, on 24 June 2014 - 01:47 PM, said:

How about we stop putting other players into archetypes and just call them players. No Timmy, Spike, Scrub or Tryhard. Only players! Because in the end, that is what we are.


You can moderate the forums, but moderating humanity is a little much.

#17 Abivard

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • 1,935 posts
  • LocationFree Rasalhague Republic

Posted 24 June 2014 - 01:56 PM

But what about us hardcore types, the ones who like to constantly challenge ourselves, Sure I can sit back and exploit whatever works best, but where is the challenge to that?

Even worse, these spikes are more often simply protecting exploits or imbalances that they personally excel at.
The timmys meanwhile use 'just wanna have fun' as an excuse to grief the HC and the Spike jocks.

Sports jocks are well known for having no relationship between their game skill and their intelligence, why assume E-Sport jocks are any different?

The Hard Core Corp is the only true way, Oorah!

#18 1453 R

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • Bridesmaid
  • 5,579 posts

Posted 24 June 2014 - 01:59 PM

View PostTechnoviking, on 24 June 2014 - 01:55 PM, said:

I can't deny it.

I love the competitive nature of this game. I'm avoiding uniting up because I love it so much.

But when someone brings out DPS charts and uses all the words that heimdlight did... I look at that as a complete ruination of what I love.

You want to talk tactics, you want to talk strategy, man I'm there! You want to only take 3 Mech types in a game with 60 on your team? Ruination!!



You can moderate the forums, but moderating humanity is a little much.


Heimdelight is an example of the very Spike-est end of the Spike spectrum. Performance, skill, and demonstrated mastery of the game are all that matter to that type of player. There’s nothing wrong with that, but it makes it very difficult for the Heimdelights of the world to try and interact with the rest of a game’s general player population, who truly don’t enjoy the game on the same level he does. There’s nothing wrong with his level, my level, your level, or anyone’s level – but understanding where he’s coming from and what level he’s arguing for is a great way to start avoiding the sort of flaming train wreck that the man’s thread ended up turning into.

#19 qki

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,034 posts
  • LocationWarsaw

Posted 24 June 2014 - 02:00 PM

I disaggree on the scrubs:

http://www.urbandict...b&defid=6162311

#20 1453 R

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • Bridesmaid
  • 5,579 posts

Posted 24 June 2014 - 02:03 PM

View PostAbivard, on 24 June 2014 - 01:56 PM, said:

But what about us hardcore types, the ones who like to constantly challenge ourselves, Sure I can sit back and exploit whatever works best, but where is the challenge to that?


Jonny/Spike. Of a different flavor than my own, and probably more accurately represented as Spike/Jonny, but I am perfectly willing to admit that I oversimplified in the name of space. Heh, as I recall the M:tG people who created the original spread in the first place have over two dozen different profiles identifying different types of hybrid player and what they like, all so that they can ensure they keep making cards that suit those players.

View Postqki, on 24 June 2014 - 02:00 PM, said:

I disaggree on the scrubs:

http://www.urbandict...b&defid=6162311


And this is exactly the problem we need to stop having. Damn Playing To Win - some dude's book does not give you an excuse to be a jerkbag on the forums. Did I not spend a page and a half telling you why 'Scrub' is not a thing?





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users