data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3ae9/b3ae9cf8cfed3e06df6984fcf2a08c460eab065d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4185/c41853c3c749491e112326bce0f46b8f540b503d" alt=""
This Crimes Commeted By Ghost Bear Can Not Go Unpunished
#1
Posted 31 December 2014 - 08:23 PM
I say that enough is enough, I say that we wolfs should go on the offinsive and start attacking Bear taritory. look I want to go after the IS as much as the next claner (looks over at the Bears) but with this attackes and every one on vacation. I feel its Justified and because of this dishonerable actions, Clan Ghost Bear should give up some of there teritory to us wolf as a repermand.
P.s. Please excuse my misspellings. there is no spellcheck on this thing and my spelling is a bit atrocious. thank you.
#2
Posted 31 December 2014 - 08:29 PM
#3
Posted 31 December 2014 - 08:39 PM
Punishing Ghost Bear for this would be an awful response.
Now, please make way for the Alpha Bears with all their virtual testosterone to flyyyy off the handle explaining to us how we would "Get Rekd" and stuff if we do this.
#4
Posted 31 December 2014 - 08:46 PM
Speerit Ward, on 31 December 2014 - 08:39 PM, said:
Punishing Ghost Bear for this would be an awful response.
Now, please make way for the Alpha Bears with all their virtual testosterone to flyyyy off the handle explaining to us how we would "Get Rekd" and stuff if we do this.
I never said it was Clan Ghost Bear as a hole but a few units. still they are working for Clan Ghost bear and broken the Ceasfire. this could then be used as a means for trile of Greavence.
I'm not say we should go into full invasion on the Ghost Bears for this but only asking for some kind of compinsation or appalagy from there main force. (I know they can't controll who joins them or controles them, but this still looks bad on them)
#5
Posted 31 December 2014 - 08:59 PM
#6
Posted 31 December 2014 - 09:02 PM
#7
Posted 31 December 2014 - 09:06 PM
#9
Posted 31 December 2014 - 09:47 PM
Speerit Ward, on 31 December 2014 - 09:45 PM, said:
Are we supposed to be impressed by some picture you ripped off a little girl from DeviantArt? You can spam it all over the forums till Paul sings, but it in no way makes you creative, ironic, or profound.
Hes.. well, got a knack for that kinda thing besides making word salad.
#10
Posted 31 December 2014 - 09:52 PM
Thing is, you can try to punish us but there is fair chance you will end up paying the price. And why risk that, given not much really happened?
#11
Posted 31 December 2014 - 09:57 PM
#12
Posted 31 December 2014 - 10:04 PM
I know it's tempting to go hardcore dramatic against these guys. But they are utilizing the game dynamics to their fullest extent, seeking good games. You can't expect much more or less from them until PGI finishes up Community Warfare.
Planets arent their goal. Theyre just an extra shiny at the end of the day, should they manage to take one.
#13
Posted 31 December 2014 - 10:14 PM
#14
Posted 31 December 2014 - 10:14 PM
#15
Posted 31 December 2014 - 10:15 PM
My theory is that, when a planet is cut off, enveloped by a faction, (Like that little combine planet in CSJ), an extra attack lane opens up to free that planet and reconnect it to supply lines.
(This might also explain the source of the bug for CGB, the extra attack for kurita having possibly consumed the available pool of open attackable planets? Like a hard limit is set per the entire IS, but not for each faction?)
Edited by Speerit Ward, 31 December 2014 - 10:19 PM.
#16
Posted 01 January 2015 - 12:26 AM
#17
Posted 01 January 2015 - 01:36 AM
Speerit Ward, on 31 December 2014 - 10:04 PM, said:
I know it's tempting to go hardcore dramatic against these guys. But they are utilizing the game dynamics to their fullest extent, seeking good games. You can't expect much more or less from them until PGI finishes up Community Warfare.
Planets arent their goal. Theyre just an extra shiny at the end of the day, should they manage to take one.
You hit the nail right on the head.
Aresye, on 31 December 2014 - 10:14 PM, said:
I am not sure I buy the whole algorithm line from Russ. If it is true, then the last time we complained and CGB got a new Kurita attack lane around an hour AFTER the cease fire the algorithm must have been having fits. Maybe they do run a program but made a fix for us...all I know is that the current planet selections seem pretty odd. And why did the Wolf/GB planets change after over a week of them staying static? I don't see the logic. Sure would be nice if we could choose the planet we want to attack.
#18
Posted 01 January 2015 - 10:16 AM
Ax2Grind, on 01 January 2015 - 01:36 AM, said:
You hit the nail right on the head.
I am not sure I buy the whole algorithm line from Russ. If it is true, then the last time we complained and CGB got a new Kurita attack lane around an hour AFTER the cease fire the algorithm must have been having fits. Maybe they do run a program but made a fix for us...all I know is that the current planet selections seem pretty odd. And why did the Wolf/GB planets change after over a week of them staying static? I don't see the logic. Sure would be nice if we could choose the planet we want to attack.
Well lucky for us this is a Beta. What CI and MS are doing now probably wont be available in the final release. I expect alot of changes to CW, all for the best.
#19
Posted 01 January 2015 - 10:55 AM
Geist Null, on 31 December 2014 - 10:14 PM, said:
WINNAR!!!!!
#20
Posted 01 January 2015 - 11:01 AM
Orion the Hunter, on 31 December 2014 - 08:59 PM, said:
^This
The Meta will be some Hardcore Lore-ists.
And MANY contract min/maxers. Smallest contract needs to be like 2-3 months and offer WAY more than Mercs.
R&R could change some of this but thats a whole other can of worms.
P.S. : Some FRR/CGB see themselves as Dominion and will hop between IS/Clan as they see fit.
Broken? Exploit? Dunno.
We have only 1 map for several RP timelines...hence some of the IS's problems coordinating vs Clans.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users