The Cicada X-5 Hero Mech...
#61
Posted 27 February 2013 - 12:55 PM
#62
Posted 27 February 2013 - 12:56 PM
Penance, on 27 February 2013 - 12:49 PM, said:
Only because none of the hero mechs have been the best variant for their respective mech so far. If a hero mech ends up having the optimal hardpoint configuration those p2w chants will be back in force.
#63
Posted 27 February 2013 - 12:56 PM
#64
Posted 27 February 2013 - 12:57 PM
#65
Posted 27 February 2013 - 12:58 PM
#66
Posted 27 February 2013 - 12:59 PM
Terror Teddy, on 27 February 2013 - 12:54 PM, said:
And the only change would essentially be a different hardpoint configuration.
Oooh...
ECM Atlas with X4 AMS slots.
Or the potential for Atlas with Missile/Ballistics hardpoints on both sides of the torso. Like how they used to look.
#67
Posted 27 February 2013 - 12:59 PM
FunkyFritter, on 27 February 2013 - 12:56 PM, said:
then peeps need to cry to FASA for making them that way, as they are basing them on lore loadouts aren't they?
#68
Posted 27 February 2013 - 12:59 PM
Hero mechs are very much the flavor of the month and the Ilya for example is fun but the X4 ballistic version is better and I also prefer the twin torso missile hunchback to the standard founders.
I wish I could change paintjob on them.
#69
Posted 27 February 2013 - 01:00 PM
I think those headlights are actually speakers to blare that annoying Cicada chchchchikkety noise all over the battlefield
#71
Posted 27 February 2013 - 01:01 PM
Terror Teddy, on 27 February 2013 - 12:59 PM, said:
Hero mechs are very much the flavor of the month and the Ilya for example is fun but the X4 ballistic version is better and I also prefer the twin torso missile hunchback to the standard founders.
I wish I could change paintjob on them.
Paint job changes to hero mechs have been confirmed, not sure which patch will allow it though.
#72
Posted 27 February 2013 - 01:01 PM
Shut up and take my MCs !
#73
Posted 27 February 2013 - 01:03 PM
Raalic, on 27 February 2013 - 12:18 PM, said:
Those are missiles. If you look at any of the atlases or the missile tubes on the awesome, the tubes have a circle-cut-in-half pattern for their little covers.
Probably four energy and two missiles, since the other cicadas have 5-6 hardpoints total. If it mounted ECM, it would be a raven killer, but something tells me that PGI wouldn't do that. If they do, oh well. It doesn't change the face of battle very much. In the end, its still a cicada.
Too bad they didn't name it "THEGARTH"
#74
Posted 27 February 2013 - 01:04 PM
Garth Erlam, on 30 January 2013 - 10:30 PM, said:
I think this pretty much clenches the idea that those are missile hard points.
oh yeah, this baby is MINE!
#75
Posted 27 February 2013 - 01:06 PM
MadSavage, on 27 February 2013 - 01:03 PM, said:
It would be good, but you can't make a major meta-changer paid only.
#76
Posted 27 February 2013 - 01:07 PM
#78
Posted 27 February 2013 - 01:08 PM
Flying Blind, on 27 February 2013 - 01:04 PM, said:
I think this pretty much clenches the idea that those are missile hard points.
oh yeah, this baby is MINE!
I think that he meant to say how can they make ANOTHER all energy Cicada when they already have two OF THOSE (2A and 2B).
#79
Posted 27 February 2013 - 01:09 PM
Adridos, on 27 February 2013 - 01:06 PM, said:
why not?
Ilya added a level of dakka dakka the game had not seen before, YLW is the only mech in the game that can effectively carry an AC20 at high speed (flame is close but not quite - though it is tougher)
I think the bottom line is that this would be a very popular mech if it has ECM and Missile tubes and that means it will sell well. I think PGI has considered this fact. we'll know the truth soon either way.
you guys may be right about Garth's comment but I took it to mean that he would change it up a bit.
so now it sounds like either
1- all energy with ECM or some other goody (sounds like the 3C minus ballistics = boring)
or
2- missiles and lasers both with or without ECM (exciting either way)
Edited by Flying Blind, 27 February 2013 - 01:13 PM.
#80
Posted 27 February 2013 - 01:10 PM
Solomon Ward, on 27 February 2013 - 12:39 PM, said:
I am waiting for a CNT 9-AH or its bigger cousin a Highlander with an AC/20 in it´s arm and three missile racks in the side torso.
CN9-AH is never gonna happen. we had the AH, then they got rid of it in place of the YLW
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users