Jump to content

Artillery + Air Strike X 8 = Instant Death Anywhere?


72 replies to this topic

#21 Adridos

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • 10,635 posts
  • LocationHiding in a cake, left in green city called New A... something.

Posted 05 March 2013 - 07:17 AM

View PostEl Penguin, on 05 March 2013 - 07:09 AM, said:

I wonder if the airstrike will be loaded with mech weapons to fire or just something special for it. I don't play TT but played a bit of MW:LL. Aren't the planes loaded with the same stuff? SRMs, Medium lasers?


Yes, they are.

View Postirony1999, on 05 March 2013 - 07:06 AM, said:

Artemis IV Fire Control is another module item thats coming...

I couldn't care less about modules. Those things are strapped into mechs and those mechs should be part of the battlefield.

#22 General Taskeen

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,737 posts
  • LocationCircinus

Posted 05 March 2013 - 07:19 AM

View PostEl Penguin, on 05 March 2013 - 07:09 AM, said:

I wonder if the airstrike will be loaded with mech weapons to fire or just something special for it. I don't play TT but played a bit of MW:LL. Aren't the planes loaded with the same stuff? SRMs, Medium lasers?


Yes, MW:LL used build rules for all the Mechs and Vehicles they added. All of its from 'canon,' so even Aerospace, based on its tonnage, carried a certain amount of armor, an engine, and different types of BT weapons.

Ex. http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Spad (30 Ton "Light Aerospace Fighter")

Edited by General Taskeen, 05 March 2013 - 07:22 AM.


#23 3rdworld

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,562 posts

Posted 05 March 2013 - 07:20 AM

View PostYokaiko, on 05 March 2013 - 07:01 AM, said:



Only you have an entire team of D-DCs, -3Ls and YLW...

....they are the only mechs that can load four modues.

:edit

Oh and Spider -5Vs (lol)


an 8 man team running nothing but D-DCs and 3Ls. That doesn't sound to far out of the question.

#24 Royalewithcheese

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,342 posts

Posted 05 March 2013 - 07:23 AM

I think that regardless of what ppl think about the P2W question, it's not very likely that they allow airstrikes to be stackable in a way that basically screws over ppl caught in the area, spammable at the start of the round, and so on. That's one of those glaring gameplay flaws that has immediate and obvious consequences when ppl start abusing it. You can only make money from your game if it's playable ;)

#25 Yokaiko

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 6,775 posts

Posted 05 March 2013 - 07:24 AM

View Post3rdworld, on 05 March 2013 - 07:20 AM, said:


an 8 man team running nothing but D-DCs and 3Ls. That doesn't sound to far out of the question.



Right now subtract two Ravens and add two splat cats and I have seen that in 8 mans.....recently.

#26 irony1999

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 302 posts

Posted 05 March 2013 - 07:24 AM

Air strikes and Artillery will definitely be location based. From... sources...

Artillery: Saturate an area with high explosive indirect fire.
Also - "Long range fire support from off map artillery. This does heavy damage in a large area on the map."

Air Strike: Aerial bombing along a vector.

#27 Adridos

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • 10,635 posts
  • LocationHiding in a cake, left in green city called New A... something.

Posted 05 March 2013 - 07:24 AM

However, to expand on the air-strike weaponry, the things from MW:LL are fighters.

You commend airtsrikes with bombers like these:
Posted Image

#28 Cassiano

    Member

  • Pip
  • Knight Errant
  • 12 posts
  • LocationBrazil

Posted 05 March 2013 - 09:09 AM

This will probably a feature that only the commander of each team can use, and not all mechs in the round.

But only speculation.

#29 Fut

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Moderate Giver
  • 1,969 posts
  • LocationToronto, ON

Posted 05 March 2013 - 09:24 AM

View PostCassiano, on 05 March 2013 - 09:09 AM, said:

This will probably a feature that only the commander of each team can use, and not all mechs in the round.

But only speculation.


Can't people switch who the commander is at any given time during a match?

#30 NeoFighter

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • The Defiant
  • The Defiant
  • 121 posts
  • LocationOn the battlefield

Posted 05 March 2013 - 09:42 AM

Im suspecting that only 1 player at a time will be able to order in an airstrike or artillery strike. Can't have 10 planes flying all at the same location now can you...oh.....wait......... battletech logic. Damn it!

#31 Greyfyl

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 983 posts

Posted 05 March 2013 - 09:47 AM

I'm sure PGI will make sure it's completely balanced. :lol:

#32 Vasces Diablo

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 875 posts
  • LocationOmaha,NE

Posted 05 March 2013 - 10:05 AM

I'm really interested to see the implementation on these. I'm assuming there will be a delay after calling in the strike. I would also hope there is some graphical representation (in coming aerospace fighter) or at the very least a warning from Betty.

These were initially discussed as "command tree" items, so it will be interesting to see if any restriction like that still applies.

Would love if they were like table top. Artillery does always land where you want it (so its not guaranteed damage) and air strikes are a strafing run of sorts (making them effective as an "area denial" weapon.

#33 FupDup

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 26,888 posts
  • LocationThe Keeper of Memes

Posted 05 March 2013 - 10:25 AM

NUCLEAR LAUNCH DETECTED

#34 Winter One

    Member

  • Pip
  • The Resolute
  • The Resolute
  • 13 posts
  • LocationMissouri

Posted 05 March 2013 - 10:27 AM

View PostGreyfyl, on 05 March 2013 - 09:47 AM, said:

I'm sure PGI will make sure it's completely balanced. :lol:

Right?

I'm a little worried about these strikes too, but I'm reluctent to judge until I see how they work in terms of:
1.Use
2.Damage
3.AoE
4.Cost

Edited by Winter One, 05 March 2013 - 10:28 AM.


#35 Seanamal

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 208 posts
  • LocationWashington, DC

Posted 05 March 2013 - 10:29 AM

Sorry but I think yelling this is only way people will understand:

Consumables are not in game yet. Won't be for at least 2 weeks. Please stop arguing about how over powered they are and that they are pay 2 win until after they are actually implemented and we get a chance to see how they actually work first hand!

Edited by Seanamal, 05 March 2013 - 10:33 AM.


#36 Rift Hawk

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Storm
  • Storm
  • 532 posts
  • LocationThe moon

Posted 05 March 2013 - 10:32 AM

View Postirony1999, on 05 March 2013 - 06:43 AM, said:

While people are raging about the flush, which I suspect will be a marginal item that is seldom used...

Is anyone else really concerned about the gameplay implications of artillery+airstrike being called onto a mech at will? Particularly if an entire team is doing it?

Seems that a team stocked on these would be able to call down instant death onto any mech of their choosing - particularly if you can force it into hiding with LRM or LR direct fire barrages.

I hope that it'll be tied to the command console - if not done properly this could be wide open to abuse. Hopefully they'll post more details on this.


Good. My airstrikes or arty strikes will be on the boating Catapult EVERY time.

#37 Corbon Zackery

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 1,363 posts

Posted 05 March 2013 - 10:36 AM

If its anything like Medal of Honors chain play. Then its going to be pretty bad because you have a LRM mech in the back just spamming airstrikes or a light will strafe past you with one. Granted you have to pay for them. But people will be spamming them.

#38 ObsidianSpectre

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 289 posts

Posted 05 March 2013 - 10:38 AM

View PostSeanamal, on 05 March 2013 - 10:29 AM, said:

Sorry but I think yelling this is only way people will understand:
Once they're in and people can pay to win, it's too late, the damage will be done. So it needs to be talked about now, before MWO's reputation is irreparably damaged and all the people serious about avoiding pay to win scenarios have left.

Let me know if you need me to yell this.

Edited by ObsidianSpectre, 05 March 2013 - 10:39 AM.


#39 Rift Hawk

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Storm
  • Storm
  • 532 posts
  • LocationThe moon

Posted 05 March 2013 - 10:39 AM

View PostCorbon Zackery, on 05 March 2013 - 10:36 AM, said:

If its anything like Medal of Honors chain play. Then its going to be pretty bad because you have a LRM mech in the back just spamming airstrikes or a light will strafe past you with one. Granted you have to pay for them. But people will be spamming them.


You can only use them once per match per person. So there will be no spamming them.

#40 Vasces Diablo

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 875 posts
  • LocationOmaha,NE

Posted 05 March 2013 - 10:49 AM

I will say, one restriction I want to see is that there must be "eyes on the target" to spot for a strike.

If playing conquest, "enemy capturing epsilon" should not equal "open map and target epsilon".





6 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users