Jump to content

3Rd Person "soon" According To Mwo Twitter


849 replies to this topic

#301 Rejarial Galatan

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 4,312 posts
  • LocationOutter Periphery

Posted 20 March 2013 - 10:19 PM

View PostVassago Rain, on 20 March 2013 - 10:17 PM, said:


If they lock this, a new one will spawn, and either way, no one trusts the company anymore. This is why you don't bite the hand that feeds.

they didnt bite the hand that feeds them. they effing swallowed the entire feeder.

#302 Roadbeer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • 8,160 posts
  • LocationWazan, Zion Cluster

Posted 20 March 2013 - 10:19 PM

View PostVassago Rain, on 20 March 2013 - 10:17 PM, said:


If they lock this, a new one will spawn, and either way, no one trusts the company anymore. This is why you don't bite the hand that feeds.


They can strike this thread down, but it will only become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.

#303 Rejarial Galatan

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 4,312 posts
  • LocationOutter Periphery

Posted 20 March 2013 - 10:20 PM

View PostKrellek, on 20 March 2013 - 10:18 PM, said:


Who is this IGP member with his trash response?

the face of the growing disrespect we all seem to be seeing from the company? honest yes. my intention? to be honest, not rude.

#304 KylleX

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 122 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationLebanon, Oregon

Posted 20 March 2013 - 10:20 PM

If we are lucky, maybe IGP will shut down MWO before PGI ruins it forever. (that's alot of acronyms)

[EDIT] I have an IDEA!! give the MWO materials to Mojang they know how to listen to people.

Edited by KylleX, 20 March 2013 - 10:22 PM.


#305 Rejarial Galatan

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 4,312 posts
  • LocationOutter Periphery

Posted 20 March 2013 - 10:21 PM

View PostRoadbeer, on 20 March 2013 - 10:19 PM, said:


They can strike this thread down, but it will only become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.

enter this:



#306 Devils Advocate

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 636 posts

Posted 20 March 2013 - 10:22 PM

Half of our community has been saying they were going to quit playing since closed beta. This wont kill the game, but if they implement it in the only way that makes any sense, where you'll be able to see behind you without turning around, it's going to upset a lot of people.

Seriously though, if you really have an issue with it, stop playing when they put it into effect. We've already got golden consumables and I think half of the board is waiting for the announcement for golden ammo (armor piercing/flak/etc). For better or worse this isn't the game they established it would be when they were asking for founder cash, and while I know a lot of you might feel like you're invested now and can't leave, pulling out until they feel that the user base has suffered is the only way to get their attention. Everybody puffs up and types about how the world is ending but then they just keep on playing and bitching on the boards and playing more, and this will continue for years with nothing changing if you don't actually act on it. Make noise and then find another game to play while this one sorts itself out, because it isn't getting any better over night.

#307 Tarman

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,080 posts

Posted 20 March 2013 - 10:22 PM

View PostKrellek, on 20 March 2013 - 10:18 PM, said:


Who is this IGP member with his trash response?



Someone who should lose their job for either being right, or being a poostick; along with the fool who hit up Twitter when they should have been working on the splash damage bug. At the very least this is a PR disaster, and at worst it is a harbinger of things to come. Neither of these options are good options. Given their past record in these types of things, confidence levels are low.

#308 Gaan Cathal

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • Bridesmaid
  • 2,108 posts

Posted 20 March 2013 - 10:23 PM

View Postdaemur, on 20 March 2013 - 07:42 PM, said:

Who is this 3rd person?

View PostKrellek, on 20 March 2013 - 10:18 PM, said:

Who is this IGP member with his trash response?


Not a professional, clearly.

#309 Byk

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 257 posts
  • LocationSeattle, WA

Posted 20 March 2013 - 10:26 PM

Man you all just need to calm down. These guys are working hard to make this game work. Wait until they reveal what they have planned. As evident with the ECM feedback (took a while for that one, but that's not the point), they do want our opinions on things without crying the sky is falling.

#310 Alexandrix

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Stone Cold
  • Stone Cold
  • 910 posts

Posted 20 March 2013 - 10:27 PM

Why is anyone surprised by this? lol
These people have already shown their true colors.
Coolant flush already.
3rd person view and gold ammo can't be terribly far behind.
If they think they can squeeze another red cent out with something,they will do it.Regardless of how much we don't want it,or rather or not it was asked for.
Expect it to be presented in one form that is completely outrageous and unacceptable,the forums to explode with ragetears,and the final implementation in the game to be slightly different,but some how acceptable.*cough* coolant flush *cough* That seems to be standard PGI MO to slide something in the game no one wants/asked for.
I've basically lost hope for this game being even a shadow of what was promised.I'll play until they take it farther than I'm willing to accept,and then I'll leave.There are far to many games out there today competing for my time for me to waste it on something that doesn't make me happy.Once MWO passes that line,my wallet will get up and go some where else.
I won't hesitate to file suit if I feel like the product,as delivered,isn't the product I was told would be in the box.Not because I give 2 rat poops about the $200 or so I've spent on this game,but just because I'm so tired of being bait and switched these days.

Edited by Alexandrix, 20 March 2013 - 10:29 PM.


#311 verybad

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,229 posts

Posted 20 March 2013 - 10:27 PM

View PostVassago Rain, on 20 March 2013 - 07:37 PM, said:

This is just ******* great news, isn't it?

PGI, why didn't you purchase the license to MW4 from mek-tek? It's clearly the game you wanted to make.

You do know that we didn't have the license to MW4? We just asked Microsoft to not sue us if we released it for free and made mods for it and they said ok. Not like we ever had money or anything. It's also not like we put 3rd person into the game...

Edited by verybad, 20 March 2013 - 10:28 PM.


#312 Thirdstar

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,728 posts
  • LocationIndia

Posted 20 March 2013 - 10:27 PM

View PostTarman, on 20 March 2013 - 10:22 PM, said:



Someone who should lose their job for either being right, or being a poostick; along with the fool who hit up Twitter when they should have been working on the splash damage bug. At the very least this is a PR disaster, and at worst it is a harbinger of things to come. Neither of these options are good options. Given their past record in these types of things, confidence levels are low.


What I'm wondering is why they answered this particular question among the hundreds that MWO Twitter surely recieves. Why this one? Why now?

#313 Ubertron X

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 110 posts

Posted 20 March 2013 - 10:28 PM

View Postdaemur, on 20 March 2013 - 07:42 PM, said:

Who is this 3rd person?
Harry Lime

Edited by Ubertron X, 20 March 2013 - 10:28 PM.


#314 Roadbeer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • 8,160 posts
  • LocationWazan, Zion Cluster

Posted 20 March 2013 - 10:29 PM

View PostThirdstar, on 20 March 2013 - 10:27 PM, said:

What I'm wondering is why they answered this particular question among the hundreds that MWO Twitter surely recieves. Why this one? Why now?


Wagging the dog... haven't seen an ECM post in 15 seconds

#315 Tor6

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 270 posts

Posted 20 March 2013 - 10:29 PM

View PostThirdstar, on 20 March 2013 - 10:27 PM, said:

What I'm wondering is why they answered this particular question among the hundreds that MWO Twitter surely recieves. Why this one? Why now?


My vote: Having one of their own people test the waters with a canned question so they could give this response and guage how much of an unholy shitstorm it'd create.

#316 I am

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 542 posts

Posted 20 March 2013 - 10:32 PM

Third person view is a big part of Mech Warrior, and its been a part of Mech warrior through the majority of the series. Those of you overreacting, ranting, and venting... its ok. You will get past this. You will still like this game more than any other game on the planet.

It is a good game. It has a ton of potential. I know at least two closed beta players who stopped playing because they wanted 3rd person implemented. Both say the same thing, it was in all the other mech warriors, why not this one too. I think for them they want third person because they get fustrated when a light is behind them exploiting their lack of peripheral view.

Thats what you have by and large, a core player base settled in their ways. Used to exploiting no 3rd person view, and angry that another exploit is being taken away. But the sun will rise tomorrow, and you will keep playing. It will just be a little more challenging for you, and MWO will be that much more true to the franchise. Mech warrior from days past, was a game which included third person.

#317 KylleX

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 122 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationLebanon, Oregon

Posted 20 March 2013 - 10:32 PM

View PostDevils Advocate, on 20 March 2013 - 10:22 PM, said:

For better or worse this isn't the game they established it would be when they were asking for founder cash, and while I know a lot of you might feel like you're invested now and can't leave, pulling out until they feel that the user base has suffered is the only way to get their attention.


This is the hard part, overall I love the game, I really do, but I see the piles of garbage laying just ahead that PGI is planning on dragging it through. I have other games to play, LoL, Natural Selection 2, Awesomenauts, etc. but I WANT this game to succeed. But at this rate it will NOT be with MY money, at least not anytime soon. Maybe, just maybe. the twitter post was just VERY misleading. A boy can dream....right?

#318 M4rtyr

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 691 posts

Posted 20 March 2013 - 10:32 PM

View PostTor6, on 20 March 2013 - 10:29 PM, said:


My vote: Having one of their own people test the waters with a canned question so they could give this response and guage how much of an unholy shitstorm it'd create.


LOL, actually not a bad theory.

#319 Rejarial Galatan

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 4,312 posts
  • LocationOutter Periphery

Posted 20 March 2013 - 10:33 PM

View PostByk, on 20 March 2013 - 10:26 PM, said:

Man you all just need to calm down. These guys are working hard to make this game work. Wait until they reveal what they have planned. As evident with the ECM feedback (took a while for that one, but that's not the point), they do want our opinions on things without crying the sky is falling.

they are sadly not working hard enough, or rather, not working on the correct issues. We are supposed to have the clan invasion TODAY---yesterday... and they are not here. they are wasting time and resources on other less essential things like hero mechs for example, or that infernal 3rd person fiasco, rather than hammering out ECM balancing, collision, knock down, CW and so on.

#320 Roadbeer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • 8,160 posts
  • LocationWazan, Zion Cluster

Posted 20 March 2013 - 10:34 PM

View PostI am, on 20 March 2013 - 10:32 PM, said:

Third person view is a big part of Mech Warrior, and its been a part of Mech warrior through the majority of the series. Those of you overreacting, ranting, and venting... its ok. You will get past this. You will still like this game more than any other game on the planet.

It is a good game. It has a ton of potential. I know at least two closed beta players who stopped playing because they wanted 3rd person implemented. Both say the same thing, it was in all the other mech warriors, why not this one too. I think for them they want third person because they get fustrated when a light is behind them exploiting their lack of peripheral view.

Thats what you have by and large, a core player base settled in their ways. Used to exploiting no 3rd person view, and angry that another exploit is being taken away. But the sun will rise tomorrow, and you will keep playing. It will just be a little more challenging for you, and MWO will be that much more true to the franchise. Mech warrior from days past, was a game which included third person.


I still want to punch you.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users