

Is This An Mmo?
#1
Posted 22 March 2013 - 11:31 AM
#2
Posted 22 March 2013 - 11:33 AM
#3
Posted 22 March 2013 - 11:40 AM
#4
Posted 22 March 2013 - 11:40 AM
#5
Posted 22 March 2013 - 11:42 AM
Though due to how... "colorful" or dysfunctional, depending on who you ask in regards to thoughts about the playerbase involved with this game, we're about a hop skip away from being a MMORPG in terms of WoW or TOR.
Really though, it's just an arena shooter for the time being, like Tribes: Ascend, since MMO is a term slung around like RPGs nowadays, where the meaning has been watered down since it's original inception. Like how Zelda is an Adventure RPG, while MWO could be considered an Action RPG due to a sense of progression in the form of the unlocks through exp and GXP grinding.
#6
Posted 22 March 2013 - 11:43 AM
The letters that follow it are still debatable.
#7
Posted 22 March 2013 - 11:47 AM
Path of Exile is not an MMO due to its instanced nature and small party size.
Planetside 2 is an MMO due to having hundreds of players in the same large area.
If MWO is an MMO with 8v8 deathmatch, then Counterstrike: Source is an MMO with 32v32 zombie mod maps.
Edited by benth, 22 March 2013 - 11:48 AM.
#9
Posted 22 March 2013 - 11:48 AM
#10
Posted 22 March 2013 - 11:48 AM
benth, on 22 March 2013 - 11:47 AM, said:
Guild wars 1 was not an MMO due to its instanced nature and small party size.
Planetside 2 is an MMO due to having hundreds of players in the same large area.
If MWO is an MMO with 8v8 deathmatch, then Counterstrike: Source is an MMO with 32v32 zombie mod maps.
this, minus the open world bit.
#11
Posted 22 March 2013 - 11:49 AM
S B, on 22 March 2013 - 11:42 AM, said:
Diablo is not "Massively" multiplayer...you can only have 4-8 people in a game at once (depending on which diablo you mean)
Quote
Agree about the watering down of "RPG", but by your definition, "RPG" is anything with progression and unlocks, which would include CoD, Battlefield, etc. I wouldn't say these are RPGs.
In fact, anything that doesn't have you playing a specific, named character that interacts with other characters through dialogue and story isn't really a "role-playing" game at all. Having a persistent "account name" does not an RPG make.
benth, on 22 March 2013 - 11:47 AM, said:
lol. yes.
#13
Posted 22 March 2013 - 11:50 AM
So yes, MWO is an MMO. But I would never really call it an MMORPG.
#14
Posted 22 March 2013 - 11:52 AM
#15
Posted 22 March 2013 - 11:53 AM

#16
Posted 22 March 2013 - 11:54 AM
Zee Tac, on 22 March 2013 - 11:50 AM, said:
So yes, MWO is an MMO. But I would never really call it an MMORPG.
Is the Massively in Massively Multiplayer Online Game in reference to the number of players playing with each other, or with the total playerbase number?
Edited by benth, 22 March 2013 - 12:54 PM.
#17
Posted 22 March 2013 - 11:56 AM
#18
Posted 22 March 2013 - 12:02 PM
If this game were like EVE with persistent world-zones, battlefields, and things like Outposts then yes it would be an MMO.
Right now we have an online arena shooter. Even with CW, it will just become an online arena shooter with a leaderboard.
I don't consider World of Tanks to be a proper MMO either. The title is abused these days.
#19
Posted 22 March 2013 - 12:02 PM
benth, on 22 March 2013 - 11:54 AM, said:
Is the Massive in Massive Multiplayer Online Game in reference to the number of players playing with each other, or with the total playerbase number?
I'd say by the amount of people in one "match/game" at the same time, or else you could easily say call of duty was an MMO because of all the people playing it.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users