Takony, on 25 March 2013 - 07:31 AM, said:
The obvious choices are the largest ballistics or PPC-s, so now the battlefield is swarmed by AC20 and PPC/Gauss mechs. LBX-10 still underwhelming.
Many mechs also have only energy and missile hardpoints, which at this moment until the missiles are tuned again, limits their efficiency, unless they can field a LOT of lasers, while keeping cool.
Damage over time (UAC-5, lasers) is risky/riskier, since it increases the exposure of the mech and/or the time while one could avoid/spread damage by hiding/torso-twisting.
Unimaginative? Well, as long as burst damage is king, you will build your mechs around the same working weapon configurations, yes, while trying to discover more viable builds.
So yes, we have to adapt and reconfigure the loadouts again, as always, until the meta-game changes again.
It'd be nice if the designers took the idea that burst damage is legitimately superior to sustained damage into account when balancing weapons. It'd be nice if they took anything into account when balancing weapons. That the SRM was doing 12x its posted damage which was already more than it should have been for six months with no designer looking at it speaks to the fact that they don't. We're just going to have to live with it.




















