Pihoqahiak, on 04 April 2013 - 09:50 PM, said:
Hmmm, I tend to think the opposite, too many people settle for mediocrity. Some people obviously feel the game is worth spending money on in it's current form. My money has recently been going to games I have felt far more worth spending money on though. Bioshock Infinite being one of them. That game really showed me the extent that MW:O is sub par with it's graphics engine compared to high end current releases...wow! Bioshock is a pretty amazing looking game, and the gameplay and story were pretty great too. Ordering it from Steam came with XCOM as well, all for half the price of what I paid into a Founder package for MW:O, and to be honest, I feel my money has been far better spent on the Bioshock deal than MW:O. I'll be happily surprised if Community Warfare ends up something worth participating in 6 months down the road, if ever. A solid, engaging, and immersive Community Warfare (that was focused on in the early Closed Beta advertising) is the only thing that really drew me to MW:O in the first place. If it really does end up having a large portion of the Community Warfare aspect become pay content as recent interviews have foreshadowed, I'll probably just chalk up the $120 as a poor expenditure and move on.
lolwut
bioshock infinite graphics are really not all that impressive. had you said borderlands 2 (cell shaded even) or crysis 3, you'd have a point.
bioshock infinite? how? the game looks like it's 3 years old already.
oh also, QQ more. the majority of people who play MWO are happy with it, your opinion is not even close to normal. so why don't you just pick up your toys and go home to play by yourself? the rest of us would appreciate not having to hear your whining anymore.
4
