3028 Only Server?
#21
Posted 03 June 2012 - 01:26 PM
#22
Posted 03 June 2012 - 01:28 PM
#23
Posted 03 June 2012 - 01:32 PM
#24
Posted 03 June 2012 - 02:23 PM
... but not in 3025. An old timeline server-base would have to be developed exclusively for those players, and would be somewhat exclusive. The whole point of MechWarrior: Online is to be inclusive and accessible... so what you're asking for would be a very, very long way in the future.
Edited by Prosperity Park, 03 June 2012 - 02:25 PM.
#25
Posted 03 June 2012 - 02:41 PM
Love Battletech but some of the purist are beyond the pale.
#26
Posted 03 June 2012 - 02:44 PM
#27
Posted 03 June 2012 - 02:51 PM
#28
Posted 03 June 2012 - 02:54 PM
#29
Posted 03 June 2012 - 02:56 PM
#30
Posted 03 June 2012 - 03:00 PM
#31
Posted 03 June 2012 - 03:18 PM
#32
Posted 03 June 2012 - 04:20 PM
#33
Posted 03 June 2012 - 04:36 PM
Just because all of the stuff that worked in the Tabletop game doesn't mean it will work well as a successful action oriented video game. From what I can tell, this era lacks enough options for a game like this. Yes, restricting someone's options can make them play better with what they have, but that doesn't mean it is fun or enjoyable in any way (Of course, this depends on the person).
Personally, I understand the liking of the time period story-wise (To a limited degree). But for gameplay I think it would be too restrictive with equipment.
Edited by White Yonder, 03 June 2012 - 04:37 PM.
#34
Posted 03 June 2012 - 05:00 PM
Give you a whole nother dimension to use to make the game exciting.
#35
Posted 03 June 2012 - 06:31 PM
White Yonder, on 03 June 2012 - 04:36 PM, said:
Just because all of the stuff that worked in the Tabletop game doesn't mean it will work well as a successful action oriented video game. From what I can tell, this era lacks enough options for a game like this. Yes, restricting someone's options can make them play better with what they have, but that doesn't mean it is fun or enjoyable in any way (Of course, this depends on the person).
Personally, I understand the liking of the time period story-wise (To a limited degree). But for gameplay I think it would be too restrictive with equipment.
I disagree. Nothing is stopping you from tweaking your loadouts. What it does do though is prevent the creation of boats or super specialized mechs due to the heat and weight issues. To be fair, 3025 would be alot less forgiving, but at the same time, the fact that it is less forgiving will make it a more challenging skill based game. Which also means that it's harder to grief or exploit the game. It would still be fun, you just need to think before you make a move. As for not having enough options, I think that people put to much emphasis of having tons and tons of options with out realizing how they will affect the gameplay. Sometimes simple is good.
With this said, even if 3025 was an option, I would also play on the 3049 server.
#36
Posted 03 June 2012 - 06:49 PM
That being said the 3025 timeframe would feel more like the hunter and the hunted, weapons carefully grouped or even Chained together to allow for heat, keeping your mech powered down in what you hope is a good ambush location that the scouts will hopefully lead the enemy into and the ability to keep a cool head and think on your feet.
3049 would provide a different playstyle, a more toe to toe feel with the chance of being able to carry enough weapons that you could Alpha strike and knock your target out of the game. It would have a higher "What a Rush" feeling as it would be much faster paced and it would be a little more forgiving in what weapons group you fired.
Either way, both have their uniqueness and individual feel about them and both would be just a fun for adaptable players.
#37
Posted 03 June 2012 - 06:55 PM
#38
Posted 03 June 2012 - 06:56 PM
Edited by enc0re, 03 June 2012 - 06:56 PM.
#39
Posted 03 June 2012 - 07:00 PM
#40
Posted 03 June 2012 - 10:49 PM
Roland, on 03 June 2012 - 12:06 PM, said:
Rot Wulf, on 03 June 2012 - 12:07 PM, said:
IF they´d be availabe, i´d certainly try them, but they are no "must have" for me...i´ll play MWO anyway
Edited by Adrienne Vorton, 03 June 2012 - 10:55 PM.
9 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 9 guests, 0 anonymous users