

I'm Amazingly Terrible At This Game, Need Some Help
#21
Posted 03 August 2013 - 07:44 AM
#22
Posted 03 August 2013 - 11:22 AM

@greyrook Thanks for your help.

@rhapsody repine Center Torso aiming is what a lot of people did in the past games, though weapon's stripping or legging is still workable in this game I believe. I've been legged at least twice and many of my weapons have been destroyed are on my arms.

@redshift I run a Windows 7 ultimatex64 with 8 core processor. My ping level is around 130ish and I have all my settings at the lowest. I believe my fps is around 5.0 most of the time (at least that's what f9 says). I feel that my machines has come a long way, from attempting to run with xp(terrible idea, even Atlases were flanking my lagging Commando.), to being able to shoot and attack enemies. Only barely though. I think that's all the info needed right?

@tusconspeed6 Not even 50, that's my max amount of damage, even if I barely started playing a few days ago. It's frustrating to play only to score like 10 damage. My buttons are similar to my MW4 and MW3 layout and both games I play effectively. Maybe there's a problem with forcing everything to my mouse? Because my aiming and my controlling is both by my mouse and only shooting and speed of my mech for my keyboard. If only I could set torso left and torso right for my main mouse keys and mouse wheel up and down for speed... I don't often die extremely quickly, but often times I can't hit anybody.

@ROJ I'm using windows 7 ultimatex64 and my fps is around 5.0 according to f9, and my ping is around 130. No laptop.

@BoPop My graphics is all the way down to low as if I got any higher in those categories, my game would probably lag out. Maybe lag, maybe I don't really know enough features, etc.
@Gremlich John I won't use a joystick, far too hard to play properly even in MW4.

@royalewithcheese I'm firing 2 at once, my arm lasers, and then 3 groups of torso lasers.
@ego1607 I'm having trouble torso twisting cause I can't put my left and right buttons as torso twisting sadly.
Thanks for the help guys, although I do have a few more questions. Is there a way to get more mechbays without money or do I have to grind and sell like that? I don't plan on spending any money, but I'm also not really wanting to run out of space that often. It'll be painful. Also, is there a way to use mouse wheel? That would be better than my arrows. Same with the torso, I would prefer usage of left and right while my actual mouse movement or left and right arrows being turning. Once again thanks for your help guys.
Edit: I see that MWO's forums and community got plenty bigger and a ton nicer. When I was playing on xp, my game was extremely laggy and barely anything showed up and when I created a thread everybody just called me colorblind, lol. No colorblind issues, barely any eye problems at all.

Edited by luxebo, 03 August 2013 - 11:25 AM.
#23
Posted 03 August 2013 - 11:58 AM
You can do a lot with the control options, but it has to be done through the actionmap XML in your user profile. This is an example http://mwomercs.com/...th-scrollwheel/ . I'm not sure if you're going to be able to do precisely what you want, although I'm not entirely clear on what it is. If it's what I think it is--swapping your torso twist for your leg twist--I would advise against that. The tank controls are not very intuitive, but they are that way for a reason. Your torso twists faster than you can turn, so you want the most accurate input (mouse direction) on the most responsive output (torso/arms) and learn to compensate with the legs. It's sort of fiddly, no doubt, but once you get your bearings it becomes pretty second nature; not to say that I haven't had times where I got my legs all confuddled in the heat of battle.
#24
Posted 03 August 2013 - 12:16 PM
You could, in theory, enter the competitions in hopes of getting the

In the near future I'll see about picking you up for a few matches. The enemies might be harder when accompanying me, but because you're there they will still be a mix of higher and lower skill players which is where I thrive even with stock builds.
Besides, it gives me new objectives, such as "protect the ambassador."
If it's possible, we'll adventure tomorrow or the day after.
#25
Posted 03 August 2013 - 12:52 PM
how much memory do you have (system or graphics)? Your ping time isn't terrible, I'm wondering if it's a screen refresh issue.
#26
Posted 03 August 2013 - 01:30 PM
#27
Posted 03 August 2013 - 01:46 PM
luxebo, on 02 August 2013 - 09:12 PM, said:
Pft this game takes all those rules any thing you learned in those games and wipes its arse with it....
remmeber this is basically a CoD version of mech warrior with what ever they could keep mechwarriorish...
#28
Posted 03 August 2013 - 01:49 PM

You can change the status quo!
#29
Posted 03 August 2013 - 02:27 PM
@Koniving What MC competitions are there? I don't see any, but I'm not the best at seeing what's out there. And how much are those going to recieve in MC value? One or two mechbays would be awesome, but I doubt anyone's really going to get more than a couple MCs. Maybe we could chill and play some MWO but I have quite the schedule. I also realize something, how does matchmaking go? Through stats or battle tier/tonnage?
@Ertur and Koniving My processor is AMD FX-8120 8 core processor w/ 3.10 GHz. My RAM or memory is 4.00 GB. Is that a bit low? My video card/graphics card is ATI Radeon HD 4300/4500 Series. Approx memory is 2794 MB and approx resolution is 1680x1050. Hope I got everything!

@Xyberviri I suck at CoD, but I believe there are some elements of each game, like Arm Lock, Pilot Trees, etc. So there's some vestige but a lot has been replaced.
@Technoviking The ones that I put in the first post is just what I know of each mech previously and from experience in earlier games. I know everyone has a different playstyle and past with Mechs, so I'm familiar with everyone having different feelings about Mechs. I have a Dragon variant with that speed in MW4, but in this game, could be completely different.
Thanks for all the advice guys.

#30
Posted 03 August 2013 - 02:38 PM
luxebo, on 03 August 2013 - 02:27 PM, said:

Your RAM is very low considering Win8 will already hog quite a bit of it. But the real catastrophe here is your graphics card. The 4000 series is 4 generations behind and the 300/500 are not really meant for gaming at all. Whoever sold you that thing seriously scammed you if he told you that thing was useable for anything more than office jobs and browser games.
Edited by Genewen, 03 August 2013 - 02:38 PM.
#31
Posted 03 August 2013 - 03:43 PM
#33
Posted 03 August 2013 - 03:45 PM
'Mechs:
Jenner
Raven
Cicada
Centurion 9A/9D
Cataphract 3D/Ilya
Stalker
Highlander
For some league play:
Atlas
Trebuchet
Weapons:
PPC, ER PPC, AC/20, SRM2-6, Gauss, Medium Las, Small Pulse (at 130+ kph only)
Equipment:
Endo - Always take it
Ferro - Take it when you can fit it
Standard Engines - Likely a good idea on almost anything but lights right now
XL Engines - Viable on fast movers
DHS - Always take it
Artemis - Always take it
Modules:
Adv. Seismic Sensor - Priority 1
Capture Module - Tied Priority 1
Coolant 9 by 9 - Priority 2
-
Remember, 3 SRM6 + 2 Meds on a Cent 9A or twin PPC + Gauss on anything else are going to be your friends. At present time, avoid all other equipment.
The trial 'mechs are like having both arms tied behind your back, and your only weapon a pair of wooden dentures.
Edited by Victor Morson, 03 August 2013 - 03:46 PM.
#34
Posted 03 August 2013 - 04:04 PM
luxebo, on 03 August 2013 - 03:43 PM, said:
Not a huge difference in resource need. Rule of thumb for both OS is that they rougly need ~1GB RAM for themselves.
Dawn of War 2, C&C Generals and TiTwi are extremely low in their requirements. I mean, come on, they demand graphics card with 128MB RAM at most! In IT terms, those were modern in the freaking stone age. Those games can not even remotely be used as a reference for modern age games. My laptop from a decade ago could run them.
BTW, lag refers to network problems. What you experience is most likely not lag, but simply horrible FPS caused by the antique office PC graphics card. 5 frames per second is a better slide show.
Krivvan, on 03 August 2013 - 03:44 PM, said:
Of course a lot of games can be run on 4GB, especially when you shut down any processes not needed at the time. But considering how cheap RAM is and has been for years now, installing low amounts of RAM is a silly idea and most commonly used by scam sellers whose customers don't know scrap about system specs. Just how graphics cards from the XP age end up in 8-core Win7 computers.

Edited by Genewen, 03 August 2013 - 04:10 PM.
#35
Posted 03 August 2013 - 04:10 PM
The only thing you'll need to upgrade in your machine to achieve playability is your GPU, and unless you have a whacky motherboard, PSU, or case (highly unlikely), I'd conservatively estimate that it's a $100 and 1-hour upgrade if you go without bells and whistles.
Krivvan, on 03 August 2013 - 03:44 PM, said:
I can confirm this. I've never seen my MWO client consume more than 2GB of memory, according to Task Manager, and tests on multiple hardware review sites have shown that games benefit very little from more than 4GB of RAM. Frankly, it would take a positively stupid amount of background software to make RAM a limiting factor, and that would create other problems no amount of RAM could solve.
Edited by IrrelevantFish, 03 August 2013 - 04:12 PM.
#36
Posted 03 August 2013 - 04:39 PM
IrrelevantFish, on 03 August 2013 - 04:10 PM, said:
I'd not say that having a trashy PSU is unlikely at all. Bad PSUs and RAM are the most common flaws in pre-built computers. Especially with an ancient graphics card which needs ~25W at most, having a PSU too weak to support much more is not that unlikely. The OP definitely has to check that before considering any upgrading.
Quote
Make that at least 120 bucks (would be a HD7770, which would be the very basic gaming card I'd recommend. I'd rather use a few bucks more and go for a 7850, which is considerably faster for the bit of cash it costs more.) and 5 minutes of upgrading if you know where your screwdriver is.

Edited by Genewen, 03 August 2013 - 04:44 PM.
#37
Posted 03 August 2013 - 04:57 PM
@Genewen C&C was probably a terrible example, but Dawn of War 2 Retribution on the highest settings (keyword: highest) works alright. It isn't the most modern game but it does need a decent graphics card for highest definition. Took me a while to get that working ok. I'd hope for no motherboard/PSU problems, but I might have to check that. It does lag (I'm just going to call it lag to simplify) quite a bit when I'm playing on MWO, don't know if it could be internet, but I'll say that graphics card is to be replaced. Hopefully I get my cash to go get something better (maybe 8000 series so I don't have to replace the card later.) Oh and so far, my best amount of FPS has been 20, but I keep getting drops down to around 5.
@Kriwan I play MWO by itself.
@IrreleventFish Is my graphics card the only thing hindering my performance and FPS or would RAM/motherboard/PSU/etc effect the game?
Thanks guys, once again appreciate help.

#38
Posted 03 August 2013 - 07:29 PM
I think it's the graphics card that is holding you back the most.
Note that this is sight unseen, and without running any benchmarks.
And I second the notion that someone had that this isn't lag. Lag is a networking issue, this is probably due to hardware. Looking around, your card was considered bad for gaming a year ago. And the tech ain't got any slower since then. They are making lower power gaming GPU's now, too. I think the better ones still need 300 watts or so, but I've been able to run a 300 watt GPU on a 250 watt system for a couple of years.
The risk is that at some point the whole thing will burst into flame and I will die a horrible screaming death, but then again maybe not.
Edit to add:
It is most likely the ATI 4300/4500 graphics card that is holding back performance for you. PSU only matters because that determines how powerfull a graphics card you can install. CPU and RAM can certainly affect things, but you may be ok for those. I don't recall seeing your Hz, but with 8 cores anything around 3GHz (give or take) would probably be ok. I'm running fine with 4GB RAM and 3.2GHz, and I've just got 2 cores.
Edited by Ertur, 03 August 2013 - 07:37 PM.
#39
Posted 03 August 2013 - 07:38 PM
Edited by Greyrook, 03 August 2013 - 07:42 PM.
#40
Posted 03 August 2013 - 07:55 PM
ego1607, on 03 August 2013 - 07:19 AM, said:
Wait, joystick for x,y, z? I hope you don't mean for torso twist, because that is a terrible idea, specially for beginner player.
Baloney, more than 20 years of playing the game the way I have been makes your POV fail.
X for yaw, Y for pitch and Z for torso twist.
Consistent over 500 damage on an HBK-4G says you do not know what works for me. beginner players are too scared to use a JS.
Wah.
@ luxebo - whatever floats your boat, mate. What works for me may not work for you. Whenever I am gunning with a competent team, usually 600+ damage with any of my Hunchies or the lone CNT-9A that I run with an LBX-10.
I have screencaps.
Edited by Gremlich Johns, 03 August 2013 - 07:59 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users