3Rd Person View Feedback
#321
Posted 20 August 2013 - 02:47 PM
#322
Posted 20 August 2013 - 02:48 PM
Love this game more and more... thinking of asking all the 5 year-olds for their credit card to pay for upgrades in the game!
#324
Posted 20 August 2013 - 02:48 PM
THE ERASER, on 20 August 2013 - 02:45 PM, said:
@ THE ERASSER: BETTER TRAINING GROUNDS!!!
BETTER TRAINNING GROUNDS AND GUIDES. LOOK WADDEHADDEDUDDE DA´s GUIDE,its perfect. but NO response from official. the community DO the job but they dont care,they do ther own thingy...
https://mwomercs.com...s-guide-to-mwo/
Edited by Mighty Spike, 20 August 2013 - 02:52 PM.
#325
Posted 20 August 2013 - 02:48 PM
Edited by Kyrs, 20 August 2013 - 02:49 PM.
#326
Posted 20 August 2013 - 02:49 PM
Edited by Geaux Tiger, 20 August 2013 - 02:50 PM.
#327
Posted 20 August 2013 - 02:49 PM
really
head shot 800m at river city
a friend of mine went headshooting with a cent and, voilá! sucess!
I REALLY HATE THIS!
THANKS PGI FOR DOING SOMETHING EVERYBODY TOLD YOU NOT TO DO
#328
Posted 20 August 2013 - 02:51 PM
you've told us:
1- No 3PV
Then
2-Separate queues
When you break someones trust its very hard to regain it....
I hope you reconsider your options about 3rd person, otherwise you gonna loose a lot of players...
#330
Posted 20 August 2013 - 02:52 PM
#331
Posted 20 August 2013 - 02:52 PM
Glad I closed the Paypal window. I got paid yesterday and was waiting to see how this patch turned out. Total bust of a patch IMO, no money spent. Especially after noticing this thread: Why no 1PV only anymore
#332
Posted 20 August 2013 - 02:52 PM
THE ERASER, on 20 August 2013 - 02:45 PM, said:
But if in this situation the enemy can still see the "Cam drone" hovering above the hill or whatever, than its fair game. The enemy can see that there is one looking in 3PV over the hill and they can react to that.
Doesnt change the fact that the guy with the drone can See your Mech and your whole team and you have no idea.
So he can tab F4 (or whatver) every few seconds and get an accurate read on everything he can see ie, Oh there is only 2 mechs over the ridge, lets kill them.
Or from your PoV, "OMG i see a drone.... well I dunno is he an assault? medium? heavy? more than 1 mech there? " yay you know a mech is there....I bet you already knew a mech was there because there are like 2-3 engagement points on ever map you assume a mech is there...
Oh and if hes hiding behind a big wall you cant see his drone but he can see around the corner GG.
#333
Posted 20 August 2013 - 02:52 PM
#334
Posted 20 August 2013 - 02:52 PM
I'm done.
#335
Posted 20 August 2013 - 02:53 PM
Zyfe, on 20 August 2013 - 02:09 PM, said:
This is false advertising. There must be laws against this ******* ********.
REFUND NOW PLEASE.
Karr285, on 20 August 2013 - 02:12 PM, said:
Bait and Swittch
Bait and Swittch
Bait and Swittch
Bait and Swittch
Bait and Swittch
Bait and Swittch
PGI/IGP in a Nutshell
There is, call you attorney general. It is a shut and dry case.
#336
Posted 20 August 2013 - 02:53 PM
Anyways things like this make me glad I only spent $15 on mech bays and nothing else. I've gotten a year's worth of play out of this game and at that price its really not bad. Not saying I'm going to stop playing but with this kind of stuff their is no way I'm willing to spend any money on it. Least i know i can sell my old mechs and probably not have to worry about buying any more bays for a looooong time
Edited by Doomstryke, 20 August 2013 - 02:57 PM.
#337
Posted 20 August 2013 - 02:53 PM
...then I saw a couple of comments about an aim-bot being included in the 3PV drone.
I'll wait, check the evidence, and do some research for myself, but if (when) it turns out to be true, I too will be asking for a refund on my PP pre-purchase.
Ifthey have included an aim-aid or aim-bot in 3PV, PGI need to be hit with every form of censure we can muster. Hitting them in their wallets is the best we have.
#338
Posted 20 August 2013 - 02:54 PM
you had long,long time ago your feedback and YOU KNOEW what would HAPPEN IF YOU DO IT THIS WAY...
Dont Tell us"SO MANY PEOPLE WANTED THIS" make better training grounds and guides...and look..no problem any more
https://mwomercs.com...s-guide-to-mwo/
Edited by Mighty Spike, 20 August 2013 - 02:57 PM.
#339
Posted 20 August 2013 - 02:54 PM
Also, you have no integrity PGI.
#340
Posted 20 August 2013 - 02:55 PM
You really dropped the ball this time.
Boldfaced lied to us.
Did what everyone was afraid you would do and threw both views together, because - what a surprise - your playerbase is not big enough to split the queue. Your attempts at justifiing all this are an insult to loyal customers that payed a lot of money and invested a lot of time testing and providing feedback in order to help you make that game, that you actually said you would make.
You claim to do this in order for the game to be around in 5 or 7 years?
I strongly suggest you turn around 180 degrees and stop slapping the people that believed you in the face.
You will lose lots of people over this and - as much as I want a great, successful MechWarrior PC game - I can't say you don't deserve it over this alone.
You claim you had to do it because people couldn't get used to pilot a BattleMech.
A simple suggestion - a tutorial - had been made by people back in the closed beta already.
Instead of going this route, that worked for so many previous MechWarrior games, you decided to use your resources for this awful situation we are facing now.
It feels like you really know how to annoy your playerbase and then you wonder why you face yet another sh'tstorm on the forum. We had you pull similar stuff for a couple of times now (though never that blatantly), maybe it's time to learn from it?
Edited by Ellen Ripley, 20 August 2013 - 02:57 PM.
9 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 9 guests, 0 anonymous users