Poll - Limit 12 V 12 Pre-Made Group Matches To 1Pv Only
#341
Posted 28 August 2013 - 03:12 PM
You don't need to be in a clan to care for MWO and be part of the "core" group. I just want MWO to feel like a Mechwarrior game. I want the mechanics to make sense and be devoid of abuse potential. I want this game to be a thinking person shooter.
#342
Posted 28 August 2013 - 03:13 PM
zorak ramone, on 28 August 2013 - 12:15 PM, said:
The only thing that gets me, and others like me (more on that in a moment), playing again is 1PV only or 1PV only queues.
I come from a team that played extensively in the NBT/UTS 1PV-NR leagues. We also only played on 1PV/NR servers. There aren't a whole lot of us left and we're not really competitive anymore. We usually have 2-4 guys online at a time if we're grouped. There's no way we could get 12 on at a time. We all only tolerate 1PV-NR, so this mode doesn't work for us.
Even if my group could regularly get 12 on at a time, this wouldn't work for me personally. I'm married, have a kid, and am not in school anymore. I don't have alot of game time available, and most of the time I have available doesn't line up with the other guys in my team, so 90-95% of the time, I'm pugging. I will only playe 1PV-NR, so this solution doesn't work for me personally.
This game was at its best back in the spring, before the first SRM nerf and before ghost heat. I was so confident and happy with the game, I finally spent money to get MC and bought me an Ilya and several mech bays. I recommending the game actively to other people. Now, I have no optimism about the game or your vision for it.
I'm sure there are many others in my situation (former MW4 1PV-NR players), and I'm (we're?) not coming back until 1PV only queues exist.
Amen! You are not the only one. You may have to play (PUG) alone, but you are not alone in this outlook.
#343
Posted 28 August 2013 - 03:13 PM
Abivard, on 28 August 2013 - 02:57 PM, said:
Umm 199% genuine troll or white knight? Please clarify your statement.
I think its funny and like what hes doing. He is only making people try harder and explore ways to prove him wrong. Most would not go through the trouble to find and put some of this stuff together otherwise. And I am sure he has added another 100 pages of opposition to these threads. I am kinda sure he is doing exactly what he intended to by feeding the fire. Or he is the worst thing PGI could have as someone on their side lol.
Chew on that one a few mins...
Edited by Dozier, 28 August 2013 - 03:17 PM.
#344
Posted 28 August 2013 - 03:13 PM
#347
Posted 28 August 2013 - 03:16 PM
Let Ppl realy decide how they want to play. Every Match.
Edited by Revorn, 28 August 2013 - 03:17 PM.
#348
Posted 28 August 2013 - 03:17 PM
CyBerkut, on 28 August 2013 - 03:05 PM, said:
The proposal clearly states that Hardcore (aka 1PV-Only) would be removed from the drop down list... so yes... if people vote for that, PGI could conceivably point toward that and claim it indicated support for that removal.
If you want a 1PV-only queue for more than just 12 vs 12 man pre-made matches, then there is no acceptable answer provided to choose in that poll.
We already have seen how willing they are to ignore polls that do not match up with their agenda. If you want a vote that can get their true attention, vote with your wallet and your feet.
This is exactly why I decided to go back and remove my vote. We should all know by now that PGI intends to twist this to suggest that they have the "vocal minority" coming around to their side on the issue of 3pv.
Also, this seems topical (although I'm hoping someone will update it)
#349
Posted 28 August 2013 - 03:17 PM
Aethos, on 28 August 2013 - 03:11 PM, said:
your poll in no way addresses those in 2/4 man drops who are opposed to 3pv and just as competitive as 12man drops
By slipping in the fact that you are going to remove the Hardcore mode option is a dastardly way of claiming that you are doing what the core group asked for.
I will gladly help in making this thread just as long as the previous 278 page thread
hardcore selection mode was a solid idea, there we have a choice, which is really all any human being wants.
I removed my vote and I would suggest if you're not 100% decided to not vote until we get some clarification as to whether this will be the only place there is ever only 1PV. Of course that's unlikely as they devs vaunted vow to communicate better is about as valid as their vow to never have to drop against 3PV. Maybe if there aren't a lot of votes they will have to say something. I know I dream.
#351
Posted 28 August 2013 - 03:19 PM
Yes means no option for 1st-person only.
No means no change in the current ****** state of affairs you're forcing.
#352
Posted 28 August 2013 - 03:19 PM
#353
Posted 28 August 2013 - 03:19 PM
Sybreed, on 28 August 2013 - 03:12 PM, said:
You don't need to be in a clan to care for MWO and be part of the "core" group. I just want MWO to feel like a Mechwarrior game. I want the mechanics to make sense and be devoid of abuse potential. I want this game to be a thinking person shooter.
You haven't played mwo if you haven't been in a proper, non-random drop... Its a different game, one you aren't part of. So yes you are far from core group.
#354
Posted 28 August 2013 - 03:19 PM
Tolkien, on 28 August 2013 - 10:55 AM, said:
Tell you what - if you manage to follow through on your word this time before the phoenix pack goes off sale, I'll even re-buy it.
At least this is my stance at the time.
To be fair though you should have a few more options in the poll such as 'implement the 1pv/3pv queues we originally said we would' or 'limit all play to 1pv' just to see what the community wants*
.... hmmmmm.... ahh yes there was one of those>
#356
Posted 28 August 2013 - 03:21 PM
I still want a Hardcore mode that is different from the basic game and 1PV only.
#357
Posted 28 August 2013 - 03:24 PM
Chavette, on 28 August 2013 - 03:19 PM, said:
You haven't played mwo if you haven't been in a proper, non-random drop... Its a different game, one you aren't part of. So yes you are far from core group.
pardon me, but I don't see how having friends to play a game puts me in a different group. You either paid a lot of money for MWO and care for its success, or you don't. Basically, your whole definition of "core" group for MWO is dependent on the possibility to have in-game VOIP or not.
#358
Posted 28 August 2013 - 03:24 PM
It is very likely that the majority do not even participate more than say 10% of all their matches total in 12-mans. In this very grindy game, you are more likely to solo PUG and/or play in many premades. Some people claim to never want to solo PUG, due to the degree of difficulty of playing alone.. and some strictly solo PUG... so 12-mans are not really in the cards for many.
Do people really know why sync dropping happens? It's because it's very difficult to put together a 12-man as if it weren't already difficult for 8-mans. There is a logical reason why people have asked for team sizes between 5 and 11... it's because filling up 12 can be like pulling teeth. It's not the most enjoyable wait all the time. People like to play together. So limiting the entire issue to just 12-mans is a completely disingenuous solution that solves virtually nothing (although, it's a good thing for "competitive play" to a limited degree).
This issue isn't going to go away w/o a fight. PGI should be prepared to take feedback seriously and not just insult the player base with this weak excuse of a compromise.
Edited by Deathlike, 28 August 2013 - 03:27 PM.
#359
Posted 28 August 2013 - 03:24 PM
BlackJackRaider, on 28 August 2013 - 03:17 PM, said:
This is exactly why I decided to go back and remove my vote. We should all know by now that PGI intends to twist this to suggest that they have the "vocal minority" coming around to their side on the issue of 3pv.
Also, this seems topical (although I'm hoping someone will update it)
how I missed this video is beyond me, one of the best takes on that i have EVER seen, and in my years of video gaming I've seen that used ALOT
#360
Posted 28 August 2013 - 03:29 PM
Franchi, on 28 August 2013 - 03:24 PM, said:
As you can tell, it came out around the time of the MC coolant fiasco. The irony is, that was actually the one time that PGI actually listened to the community and yanked a bone-headed idea. If I knew who made the first one, I would ask them to update it for the current crisis...although keeping it up to date might become a really labor intensive job.
9 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 9 guests, 0 anonymous users