904 replies to this topic

[Kibble]

Yet the Yes's are winning.

Yes (583 votes [91.67%])
No (53 votes [8.33%])

Voting yes just states that you are ok with PGI lying to us about the different queues and reinforcing them to say "see we were right about not adding it"

Edited by Kibble, 28 August 2013 - 05:06 PM.

[Sahoj]

I can understand them doing this and if the Community grows enough that it can handle a split - add the hardcore modes down the road.

[keith]

i have a crazy question to ask. since us forum poster are the "minatory", should an important poll such as this be posted into the comstar link inside the MWO client?

[Kunae]

Sahoj, on 28 August 2013 - 05:06 PM, said:

I can understand them doing this and if the Community grows enough that it can handle a split - add the hardcore modes down the road.

No, they need to approach it from the other direction. If the community can handle a split, only then do you add in the 3pv modes.

Add actual tutorials to help new players, 3pv does not help them at all, and actually is counter-productive.

[R5D4]

Ramblin, on 28 August 2013 - 02:20 PM, said:

I feel like I had to vote yes because there isnt any other options.... 12v12 is hard to do on a nightly basis for many units/teams/groups. At least its an option that gives us a chance to sometimes avoid the arcade game yall have created here.

Private lobbies with the ability to set tonnage, # of players, game mode, 3pv/1pv would solve this and MANY other issue's you guys are having with the community... are you gents aware of this?

I agree with this statement 100% I only voted yes here because there isn't any other option.
I also support the idea of set tonnage with game mode selection (3PV/1PV).

[saintchuck]

This should be a reality TV show. Maybe a lead-in to Honey Boo Boo.

[GreatBeer]

Caballo, on 28 August 2013 - 03:30 PM, said:

THIS-IS-WHAT-THE-COMMUNITY-SAID

This.

[soarra]

R5D4, on 28 August 2013 - 05:10 PM, said:

I agree with this statement 100% I only voted yes here because there isn't any other option.
I also support the idea of set tonnage with game mode selection (3PV/1PV).

thats why i didn't vote at all
i voted on http://mwomercs.com/...oll-not-biased/

[Kunae]

R5D4, on 28 August 2013 - 05:10 PM, said:

I agree with this statement 100% I only voted yes here because there isn't any other option.
I also support the idea of set tonnage with game mode selection (3PV/1PV).

The other option is to opt-out of this false-poll, and choose not to vote in a biased poll.

[rollermint]

This is a step in the right direction and brings back some goodwill and positivity amongst a significant portion of your core audience. Well done!

[Night Fury76]

Perfect

Now that wasn't so hard, was it?

[soarra]

Nonreflectiv, on 28 August 2013 - 05:12 PM, said:

Perfect

Now that wasn't so hard, was it?

yes it was , it's a biased poll and still goes against everything they said about 3pv

[jollyrancher1]

3pv gives a slight advantage over fp view right now as you can easily see over cover. 3pv still has more disadvantages that are minor, so at first I thought it wouldn't affect game play, but after seeing this: video and trying it myself in a 4ppc stalker I gotta say that 3pv is a big advantage in that specific situation. I would love to have this nerfed somehow.

[Gragor Bloodsoul]

Yeah I am just going to delete my vote, I appreciate the attempt but this not the compromise I was looking for. I am still here and reading... but just barely.

[Killashnikov]

A good step to help defuse the anger of the community. You may even get back some of the withdrawn investments, I hope so for the game's sake. None of us want this to die or stagnate. I have not yet voted for two reasons. 1, I imagine you will get an overwhelming yes vote on this. 2, I am concerned like many about how this will affect future match options. Specifically CW.

[Sahoj]

The other poll isn't very good either.

For some reason PGI is going pale at the concept of splitting the community.

I need something like, "1PV only in 12-mans as a stop-gap fix for now - Hardcore and other expanded modes/lobbies after Launch/new UI"

[nitra]

still trying to decide whether to vote on this or not,

i would like to see this a bit more flexible to encompass those of us who just want to drop in any 1pv only, even if it requires a big red flashy thingy stating that i may have to wait extra minutes to drop.

Edited by nitra, 28 August 2013 - 05:24 PM.

[CyBerkut]

Squid von Torgar, on 28 August 2013 - 01:44 PM, said:

Guys, vote yes for crying out loud, even if you don't frequent 12 v 12s I can guarantee you that if 1PV only isn't implemented there you will have no chance of seeing it in the wider game later.

Make it a landslide in order to increase the chances. PGI are watching, make sure your voice is heard.

Said landslide will give PGI the 'evidence' they probably want to help justify deleting Hardcore mode from the rest of the group sizes. It's part of Bryan's proposal right there under your noses.

The votes that get 'heard' are the ones you make with your wallets and your feet.

[soarra]

nitra, on 28 August 2013 - 05:18 PM, said:

still trying to decide whether to vote on this or not,

i would like to see this a bit more flexible to encompass those of us who just want to drop in any 1pv only, even it requires a big red flashy thingy stating that i may have to wait extra minutes to drop.

Don't give in to the darkside

[Oriius]

I too have withdrawn my vote, for similar reasons as above.

I have voted in soarra's poll. http://mwomercs.com/...oll-not-biased/