bloo58, on 18 September 2013 - 03:12 AM, said:
Ok let's see..
Namecalling - check
Wildly exaggerated assumptions - check
Disparagement - check
Meaningless or obvious facts - check
Oh yeah, really good arguments indeed. That's totally going to convince everyone to be nice again.
Just btw. the players pay the developers' bills, not the other way around. It might actually seem like the devs owe the players some gratitude. I've heard there are even industries where the customer is king. Not games development, mind you..
bloo58, on 18 September 2013 - 03:12 AM, said:
Strawman? Thought-terminating cliché? I am not sure what to say. And tbh I'm not sure what you want to say. But it sure looks like you' re angry. You just don't bring a lot of facts.
And yeah, whether or not PGI takes into consideration ANY feedback, be it by players or reviews or whatnot, is totally up to them.
-edit-
But in the exact same the players have no 'right' to tell the devs how to do things, the devs, or other players, have no 'right' to tell the players what to say, or what to like, or when to shut up.
This is no matter of rights, this is no matter of rules or god given authorities.
This is a matter of players wanting a great game and devs wanting to get paid. If players wouldn't care, they would just leave and let the game die. So in a way, even a complaining player is way better than a non existing one.
Actually, many games would've already died at this point, and MW:O would've gone the way of the Dodo if it wasn't for the BT franchise and a lot of die-hard fans.
It's a pity so few people around here face the actual facts. Instead we have a big ego pee-ing contest.
Edited by John Norad, 18 September 2013 - 03:54 AM.