

What Medium To Buy?
#1
Posted 10 October 2013 - 03:15 PM
I'd like to do something in a medium and I'm leaning toward the Blackjack just for physical similarity to the Jaeger(high mount arms).
What are your thoughts on my choice? Is there a better suited medium for what I want to do? If not, what variant would be the best to pick up first?
Side note: Centurions are kind of off the table; I have a Wang and am not really a fan of it.
#2
Posted 10 October 2013 - 03:25 PM
#3
Posted 10 October 2013 - 03:35 PM
4G/H- Second line brawler, using the big gun to take out damaged sections
4J/4SP- Missile boats that can move quickly, SP is very good Light-killer/brawler
4P- Laser boat that is great for killing anything
Edited by Lord Ikka, 10 October 2013 - 03:37 PM.
#4
Posted 10 October 2013 - 03:38 PM
Take the BJ-1 for ballistic, the BJ-3 for Energy and the BJ-1X loses the jump jets but has a higher engine rating allowing it to go faster than its cousins. the BJ-1-DC is the ugly duckling, it drops the jump jets from the 1 model but dosnt get the speed boost of the 1X, instead gaining two extra energy hardpoints.
----------
Also note that next month the 55 ton Shadowhawk will be available to none Project Phoenix buyers, and uh somewhere down the road two more mediums are squeezing through the door in the form of the Griffin and Wolverine
#6
Posted 10 October 2013 - 04:15 PM
#7
Posted 10 October 2013 - 08:50 PM
kryowyrm, on 10 October 2013 - 03:15 PM, said:
I'd like to do something in a medium and I'm leaning toward the Blackjack just for physical similarity to the Jaeger(high mount arms).
What are your thoughts on my choice? Is there a better suited medium for what I want to do? If not, what variant would be the best to pick up first?
Side note: Centurions are kind of off the table; I have a Wang and am not really a fan of it.
If you love the Dakka, the BJ1 is a good choice.
They are sometime known as minijager.
Pack 2x AC/2 with 5t of ammo and Zoom module, hang back from the frontline and rock people with constant AC/2 pinging.
The BJ1 is a flexible mech, you can put in an AC/20 or LBX and play close range or stick to GR and small AC for range support.
The 3x AC/2 Hunchback 4G with 6t or 7t of ammo can pour out some really insane Dakka too.
Standard AC/20, 3x MLaz 4G is a wrecking ball, but you will need to stay low profile to avoid having people hunting you down to remove your big gun.
I also run across 3x MG, 2x LPLAz Hunchback with max XL engine. They are fast, pack quite abit of amour and can seriously rip things apart.
#8
Posted 10 October 2013 - 09:01 PM
My preferred build right now is a BJ-1 with an AC10 and 3ML, very effective.

Edited by hargneux, 11 October 2013 - 12:25 AM.
#9
Posted 10 October 2013 - 09:02 PM
#10
Posted 10 October 2013 - 09:08 PM
BJ1. AC20 + 3MLAS. 235XL.
BLAM!
Toffs ( '-')7
#11
Posted 10 October 2013 - 09:27 PM
BookWyrm, on 10 October 2013 - 09:02 PM, said:
This. The Wang is a pretty contentious model, as well - it's a solid mech, but requires an extremely specific playstyle. However, if you already have it and have XP on it, you could pick up two more Centurions for easier Mastery (yay 2xBasic bonuses!).
The Centurions are amongst the most durable mechs in the game, and unlike the Wang the others have much more flexible playstyles and don't rely on the arm so strongly.
CN9-A for example. Tear off both arms, it's still dealing pretty much full damage. Lose the right torso? Nothing happens. Left Torso? It can take even more damage due to the missile bay doors, but you've still got your MLas. This bad boy moves fast, and keeps fighting till the bitter end.
#12
Posted 11 October 2013 - 01:11 AM
1) All Centurions have miserable hard points.
2) The mech is huge and wide.
3) The "best" Centurion build relies on 3 ASRM4/6 that have absolutely atrocious hit registration and even when they work, they force you to get close to the target.
4) The only saving grace that actually places Centurion among best medium mechs in the game is a damage transfer reduction mechanic. Centurion's destroyed arm stumps and wrecked side torsos are wonderful shields that give 50-75% flat damage reduction on incoming fire that hits them.
If PGI decides to "change their position" on this silly invention of theirs, Centurion will return to bottom of the medium weight class.
Edited by Kitane, 11 October 2013 - 01:12 AM.
#13
Posted 12 October 2013 - 08:29 AM
As for the blackjack, it can be fun but don't expect a miracle worker. Ammo shortages at 45 Tons are your main issue. Mechs like the Kintaro require massive investments to be successful like huge XL engines and Speedtweak, same for the Cicada. Treb is **** as is the Cent.
Some quick builds:
HBK 4G. 82kph AC20 Build.
HBK 4SP. Std275 Build.
HBK 4P. Std275 Build.
Havent really played the Hunchback since the medium mech buffs to agility and so on, should be even better now especially since the engine cap increase.
SHD 2H(P). My AC20 build for the Shadowhawk. will use this and a 3x AC2 build for long range damage.
#14
Posted 12 October 2013 - 10:18 AM
This offers an additional DHS raising your heat capacity and dissipation rates, and reduces heat generation and avoids Ghost Heat when alpha-striking.
I hated Hunchbacks until very recently. They were very popular in the Closed Beta crowd, but that was largely because of how competitive they were Back In The Day - they kind of sucked compared to Centurions (faster, no hunch vulnerability and massively more survivable) more recently. However, we recently had the Medium Mech Balancing Pass, and this saw an increase to torso twist and max engines on the Hunchbacks.
Now, Hunchbacks move upwards of 100kph, and can twist far enough to fire at mechs behind them. That's a very, very substantial buff, and it makes them much better overall. They're fast, agile, compact, and can deliver a strike comparable to that of a Heavy mech.
#15
Posted 12 October 2013 - 10:30 AM
#16
Posted 12 October 2013 - 10:34 AM
#18
Posted 12 October 2013 - 02:17 PM
Kjudoon, on 12 October 2013 - 02:12 PM, said:
I'm torn between the Trebuchet and the Kintaro 19 right now. Why no lovin for either of these?
They're not unusably bad, just not as good as... Well, anything else.
#20
Posted 12 October 2013 - 02:24 PM

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users