Jump to content

So, Next Month's Hero Hunchback, Any Thoughts On What It Will Be?


116 replies to this topic

#61 CDLord HHGD

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,190 posts
  • Location"You're not comp if you're not stock."

Posted 04 November 2013 - 06:43 AM

View PostBishop Steiner, on 03 November 2013 - 12:41 PM, said:

you do know the HBK-IIC is one of the most spectacularly BAD mechs ever designed, right? Two big guns, and JJs...... with tissue paper armor, 5 total rounds between then (oh boy 7 rounds in MWO!!!!) and literally no room to actually improve it to make that feature work.

Maybe with 2x Ballistic in each torso, AC in one side, dual MGs in the other, and the standard load-out of lasers... With JJ, could become a very nice light hunter....

#62 Carrioncrows

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Rage
  • Rage
  • 2,949 posts

Posted 04 November 2013 - 06:45 AM

8 Ballistic hardpoints

1 each side torso
2 ct
2 each arm

Edited by Carrioncrows, 04 November 2013 - 06:54 AM.


#63 Zerberus

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 3,488 posts
  • LocationUnder the floorboards looking for the Owner`s Manual

Posted 04 November 2013 - 08:50 AM

View PostBarantor, on 01 November 2013 - 07:39 AM, said:

Big hunch - 2 Ballistic, other side 1 missile rack, center torso 1 energy, energy on the arms and two energy on the head instead of just one. Call it the Taurus or something since the lasers on the head will make it look like it has horns. Total of 5 energy, 2 Ballistic and one missile.

And where is the extra crit slot for the second head laser going to come from? :P

#64 MeiSooHaityu

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 10,912 posts
  • LocationMI

Posted 04 November 2013 - 09:05 AM

View PostBishop Steiner, on 03 November 2013 - 12:41 PM, said:

you do know the HBK-IIC is one of the most spectacularly BAD mechs ever designed, right? Two big guns, and JJs...... with tissue paper armor, 5 total rounds between then (oh boy 7 rounds in MWO!!!!) and literally no room to actually improve it to make that feature work.



Yea, the Hunch IIC is where clanners send old Mechwarriors to die. They figure the less capable pilots can inflict some serious damage before they run out of ammo and die.

This begs the question...How many Hunch IICs do the clanners have? LOL. They must flow off the assembly line like water over a waterfall.

In anycase, a similar build might be OK if you are running dual A/C5s (which you can do in the 4G anyway).

#65 Jman5

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Littlest Helper
  • Littlest Helper
  • 4,914 posts

Posted 04 November 2013 - 11:37 AM

1 Ballistic and 2 Missile slots in the hunch, 2-4 energy slots in the arms, 1 energy slot in the head.

#66 Sephlock

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 10,819 posts

Posted 04 November 2013 - 12:32 PM

Since I won't get the pure awesomeness that I suggested, how about a head mounted ballistic slot, so I can snipe with an AC/2 over hills?

#67 3rdworld

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,562 posts

Posted 04 November 2013 - 12:38 PM

  • 1 ballistic in each side torso and JJs.
  • 4 SP but with 4 2 tube missle launchers & JJs or ECM, larger engine
  • 1 High mounted ballistic and energy on the other side with JJs.
bout all I can think of.

#68 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 04 November 2013 - 01:14 PM

View Post3rdworld, on 04 November 2013 - 12:38 PM, said:

  • 1 ballistic in each side torso and JJs.
  • 4 SP but with 4 2 tube missle launchers & JJs or ECM, larger engine
  • 1 High mounted ballistic and energy on the other side with JJs.
bout all I can think of.


i really like the second one. I ran a 4 ssrm2, 4 medium pulse laser jumping ecm hunchy in tt and it was a blast!

#69 Treye Snow

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 160 posts
  • LocationNot where I want to be

Posted 04 November 2013 - 02:57 PM

View Post3rdworld, on 04 November 2013 - 12:38 PM, said:

  • 1 ballistic in each side torso and JJs.
  • 4 SP but with 4 2 tube missle launchers & JJs or ECM, larger engine
  • 1 High mounted ballistic and energy on the other side with JJs.
bout all I can think of.


View PostBishop Steiner, on 04 November 2013 - 01:14 PM, said:

i really like the second one. I ran a 4 ssrm2, 4 medium pulse laser jumping ecm hunchy in tt and it was a blast!


I will agree on the probability of it being a 4SP-like hunchie and have dual ballsitic, low-profile hunches (incapable of AC/20's) with a couple missle hardpoints, maybe 1-3 lasers and MAYBE JJ's. ECM wont happen.

Good idea would be like:
LA - 1E
LT - 1B 1Mx4Tube
Head 1E
RT - 1B 1Mx4Tube
RA - 1E

Maybe 2B in each ST? I wouldn't mind a build like 3ML 4MG 2 SRM4's

I'd buy that in a heartbeat.

#70 RavensScar

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 219 posts
  • LocationUK

Posted 04 November 2013 - 03:20 PM

I'm not sure how likely ballistics in both STs is. Gotta be very careful with that one, or both the 4G and 4H become completely redundant. Hunchies running a big XL and 2 AC/10s? Possibly a bit OP.

Ballistics in both arms is possibly more likely. No chance of 2 AC/20, and no ridge-humping. However, it might knock out the Centurion instead!

I'm not sure whether to expect ballistics, missiles and lasers. It feels less OP, but I was holding out a hope that the 4N might make it into the game as a standard variant at some point.

#71 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 04 November 2013 - 03:23 PM

View PostRavensScar, on 04 November 2013 - 03:20 PM, said:

I'm not sure how likely ballistics in both STs is. Gotta be very careful with that one, or both the 4G and 4H become completely redundant. Hunchies running a big XL and 2 AC/10s? Possibly a bit OP.

Ballistics in both arms is possibly more likely. No chance of 2 AC/20, and no ridge-humping. However, it might knock out the Centurion instead!

I'm not sure whether to expect ballistics, missiles and lasers. It feels less OP, but I was holding out a hope that the 4N might make it into the game as a standard variant at some point.

2 torso ballistic not as big as you think as it's pretty much impossible to make a viable build with larger than twin 5s, maybe uacs, due to the tonnage. 50 tons mech, even with an XL only has so much tonnage available. At max, you can get about 25 tons of weaponry.


But if I could mount a uac in each torso, and have the usual 3 lasers hard points in the head and arms, that would be pretty cool, IMO.
Posted Image

Edited by Bishop Steiner, 04 November 2013 - 03:31 PM.


#72 Roadkill

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,610 posts

Posted 04 November 2013 - 03:53 PM

View PostBishop Steiner, on 04 November 2013 - 03:23 PM, said:

2 torso ballistic not as big as you think as it's pretty much impossible to make a viable build with larger than twin 5s, maybe uacs, due to the tonnage.

Agreed, that's why I think that an SP that replaces all of the missile hardpoints with 1 ballistic in each side torso is a reasonable hero.

For the guy who thought twin AC/10s would be OP... you can fit 2 of them with an XL255, moderately stripped armor, and 2 tons of ammo. No backup weapons. And at 32 points of armor per leg, you're going to get legged. A lot. Barely viable... not even close to OP.

#73 Wildstreak

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Civil Servant
  • Civil Servant
  • 5,154 posts

Posted 04 November 2013 - 04:08 PM

I don't think it will be something like the 4SP, that was always an odd duck and did not fit the whole Hunchback theme.

Sure, PGI could do whatever it wanted but they did skip an interesting one, the 4N, Still a lot of RT weapons with stock 8 spots but it mixes 1B, 2M with 5E on the same frame.

I would also fin a JJ Huncie interesting and it would be very valuable even with fewer weapon slots. Even 1B in the RT and JJ, give it a UAC or Gauss for poptarts and it is shoulder mounted so no need to expose yourself too much when popping.

#74 Warge

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,027 posts
  • LocationKiyiv

Posted 04 November 2013 - 04:28 PM

What's about Quasimodo or HBK-5SG?

#75 Deathlike

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Littlest Helper
  • Littlest Helper
  • 29,240 posts
  • Location#NOToTaterBalance #BadBalanceOverlordIsBad

Posted 04 November 2013 - 06:45 PM

Unless there's a JJ hunchy that's accessible, you're might tread on an imbalance if a hero hunchy had JJs.

Having JJs on any Hunchy would make it a crazy version of the ShadowHawk and you already know how popular they are...

#76 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 04 November 2013 - 06:50 PM

Posted Image

nothing to see here..... move along....

:P

#77 FupDup

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 26,888 posts
  • LocationThe Keeper of Memes

Posted 04 November 2013 - 06:51 PM

View PostBishop Steiner, on 04 November 2013 - 06:50 PM, said:

Posted Image

nothing to see here..... move along....

:P

The Ghetto Hunchie IIC!

#78 Strum Wealh

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Raider
  • The Raider
  • 5,025 posts
  • LocationPittsburgh, PA

Posted 04 November 2013 - 07:01 PM

So, just to throw it out there...
  • Standard Structure
  • full set of actuators in each arm
  • 200 STD Engine
  • 12 DHS (x8 in Engine, x2 in LT, x2 in RT)
  • no jump capability
  • maxed-out Standard Armor
  • Starting Weapons: x1 Small Laser (Head), x2 PPCs (1 in LT, 1 in RT), x4 Machine Guns (x2 in LA, x2 in RA) with 2 tons of ammo (x1 in LA, x1 in RA)
  • Hardpoints: x3E (x1 in Head, x1 in LT, x1 in RT), x4B (x2 in LA, x2 in RA), x1 AMS (in LT)
  • Arms: 30-degree pitch, 25-degree yaw
  • Torso: 20-degree pitch, 120-degree yaw
The alternate version switches out the Standard Armor for Ferro-Fibrous and shaves a bit off of each leg in order to accommodate two additional DHS (one in each side-torso).

Thoughts?

Edited by Strum Wealh, 04 November 2013 - 07:09 PM.


#79 Finestaut

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 169 posts

Posted 04 November 2013 - 07:36 PM

View PostStrum Wealh, on 04 November 2013 - 07:01 PM, said:

  • Starting Weapons: x1 Small Laser (Head), x2 PPCs (1 in LT, 1 in RT), x4 Machine Guns (x2 in LA, x2 in RA) with 2 tons of ammo (x1 in LA, x1 in RA)
Thoughts?


I came into this thread to post the exact same thing. Pew Pew Pew shoulder PPCs.

#80 MeiSooHaityu

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 10,912 posts
  • LocationMI

Posted 05 November 2013 - 08:48 AM

View PostBishop Steiner, on 04 November 2013 - 06:50 PM, said:

Posted Image

nothing to see here..... move along....

:)


I am a Hunchback pilot, and I approve this design :tup:





5 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users