ColonelMetus, on 09 November 2013 - 04:43 PM, said:
if lrm flooding isnt a problem then how come
A:) it is prevalent in every match?
Nope. I'll be generous and say that 1 in 4 matches, there are Lurms involved. Out of that portion of matches that do occur, 1 in 4 matches, they are used properly (this means good firing locations and good spotting).
Quote
b:) this topic has become such a hot button issue?
It is always a hot button issue because of the discrepancies on what people think LRMs are, and what they actually are. This in conjunction at the level of play and usage, distorts the view of the LRM further.
Here's what it sounds like in this game.
Newbies using LRMs vs other newbies:
It's so easy, anyone can use it.
Newbies using LRMs vs veterans:
It's so ineffective, LRMs need a buff!
LRMs vs newbies reaction:
How am I supposed to avoid this OP weapon? They need to be nerfed. They are point and click!
LRMs vs veteran reaction:
lol Lurms
Veterans using LRMs vs veterans:
FFS guys, SPOT FOR ME
Veterans using LRMs with good spotters vs anyone:
LURMS BLOCK OUT TEH SUN!
That is the jist of how LRMs are considered by the community.
Quote
and its funny how LRM flooders only input into the conversation is "lol ams" when ams is innefective at best.
AMS is effective, but not enough people carry it and/or are not truly threatened by LRMs in general.