Kunae, on 09 December 2013 - 12:02 PM, said:
It's not a Creative Director update. This was done by Paul. Those are done by Bryan.
Just because you project "dissatisfaction and unhappiness as the foundation of reasoning processes" on others, doesn't make it true. White-knighting doesn't accomplish anything, with this company, other than make them think they're doing great and that people who criticize their stupid choices are "on an island". Like their misguided egos needed more stroking than NGNG provides...
This "announcement" is disingenuous, and to claim otherwise is very naive.
All systems nominal... of course.
Accusing me of psychological projection doesn't make your allegation true either. You're going to have to do better than "no, YOU!" if you're going to answer criticism effectively. Nor does trying to claim that Bryan normally posting a certain topic requires that the topic
always be posted by him make your shoddy reasoning any more credible. Nor does dismissing any criticism as "white-knighting" prove anything but that your reasoning process is... embarrassing.
Objecting to irrational criticism (which you call "white-knighting,") is bad because it will make "this company" think it's "doing great" when really it's making stupid choices? I don't even know where to start with the irrationality of this reasoning. You disagree with various decisions, so they are stupid. "This company" is run by a bunch of "misguided egos," in your opinion, who think that criticisms like this are the product of an irrational minority. So challenging your opinions about the company and its development team is
a priori bad - because of your opinions about the company and its development team.
This self-referential crazy-land you live in might stroke
your ego, but you're going to have to resort to more than appeals to your own authority and name-calling if you want to sway those of us who are sane. Slander is not a valid substitute for facts, or an acceptable means of advancing your views.