Heffay, on 09 December 2013 - 12:45 PM, said:
End Of Year Designer Update
#41
Posted 09 December 2013 - 12:49 PM
#42
Posted 09 December 2013 - 12:50 PM
Edit: This makes it even more pathetic...
Edited by Buso Senshi Zelazny, 09 December 2013 - 12:59 PM.
#43
Posted 09 December 2013 - 12:53 PM
But since you're here, why not check out Lordred's Perfect Screenshot thread for the latest additions of awesomeness?
Quickly, for if you stay here staring at the sun it will kill you!
#44
Posted 09 December 2013 - 01:02 PM
#45
Posted 09 December 2013 - 01:16 PM
Pyrrho, on 09 December 2013 - 12:36 PM, said:
A positive note: people are still excited when they see stuff on the forums from the Developers. All hope is not lost.
Always better than having new info 100% only on a social network like twitter or Facebook...but a front page link for old news...
#46
Posted 09 December 2013 - 01:19 PM
and then i was like:Oh wtf is that?
#47
Posted 09 December 2013 - 01:20 PM
Rightly or wrongly, the stench of abject apathy is palpable... and in keeping with the glacial pace of development this year.
#50
Posted 09 December 2013 - 01:29 PM
#52
Posted 09 December 2013 - 01:51 PM
#53
Posted 09 December 2013 - 01:52 PM
like a restaurant that's gross..
like a home that's filthy trashed..
like a dog that doesn't listen..
#55
Posted 09 December 2013 - 01:55 PM
Edited by Belorion, 09 December 2013 - 02:02 PM.
#56
Posted 09 December 2013 - 02:19 PM
#57
Posted 09 December 2013 - 02:27 PM
mods please move to k-town. also i think a warning to the poster about unecessary clutter is in order.
#58
Posted 09 December 2013 - 02:45 PM
Kunae, on 09 December 2013 - 12:02 PM, said:
Just because you project "dissatisfaction and unhappiness as the foundation of reasoning processes" on others, doesn't make it true. White-knighting doesn't accomplish anything, with this company, other than make them think they're doing great and that people who criticize their stupid choices are "on an island". Like their misguided egos needed more stroking than NGNG provides...
This "announcement" is disingenuous, and to claim otherwise is very naive.
All systems nominal... of course.
Accusing me of psychological projection doesn't make your allegation true either. You're going to have to do better than "no, YOU!" if you're going to answer criticism effectively. Nor does trying to claim that Bryan normally posting a certain topic requires that the topic always be posted by him make your shoddy reasoning any more credible. Nor does dismissing any criticism as "white-knighting" prove anything but that your reasoning process is... embarrassing.
Objecting to irrational criticism (which you call "white-knighting,") is bad because it will make "this company" think it's "doing great" when really it's making stupid choices? I don't even know where to start with the irrationality of this reasoning. You disagree with various decisions, so they are stupid. "This company" is run by a bunch of "misguided egos," in your opinion, who think that criticisms like this are the product of an irrational minority. So challenging your opinions about the company and its development team is a priori bad - because of your opinions about the company and its development team.
This self-referential crazy-land you live in might stroke your ego, but you're going to have to resort to more than appeals to your own authority and name-calling if you want to sway those of us who are sane. Slander is not a valid substitute for facts, or an acceptable means of advancing your views.
#59
Posted 09 December 2013 - 02:46 PM
Niko Snow, on 09 December 2013 - 02:42 PM, said:
Ok, that makes more sense. Thank you for the context.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users