What's That 'mech?
#41
Posted 11 December 2013 - 07:22 AM
Reseen Archer?
Madcat, kinda obvious one....
Cyclops? Stretch but the arms make me think odd things.
With the NGNG post though it makes me think that it is just a madcat or some clan mech. The only alternative is that it is some sort of comstar exclusive mech.
#42
Posted 11 December 2013 - 07:32 AM
#43
Posted 11 December 2013 - 07:33 AM
#45
Posted 11 December 2013 - 07:41 AM
#46
Posted 11 December 2013 - 07:50 AM
http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Warhammer
could they have possibly sorted out that snafu with whoever that was that filed the lawsuit thingy?
Edited by plural boink, 11 December 2013 - 07:50 AM.
#47
Posted 11 December 2013 - 07:50 AM
CMetz, on 11 December 2013 - 07:41 AM, said:
Gee, y'think?
Honestly, my theory is intentional leak, plus bait'n'switch. Make you think it's going to be a MadCat/Timberwolf, reveal it to be new Hunchback Hero, with double hunch. And while it will attract interest, I'm thinking PGI will have to deal with fall out from the people that feel they were screwed with. The fact that it's a "leak" will simply give them plausible deniability.
There's always a chance that someone took a screen cap of a new Hunchie Hero, someone noticed what the shadow looked like, cropped the image, and passed out the link as a joke, and that it really was an unauthorized leak.
I can't help but think that MadCat is probably the least likely possibility.
#48
Posted 11 December 2013 - 08:17 AM
#49
Posted 11 December 2013 - 08:22 AM
IIC one is kinda similar.
#50
Posted 11 December 2013 - 08:37 AM
MonkeyCheese, on 11 December 2013 - 02:25 AM, said:
I wish. But now that you mention it, its not too far off.
http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Anubis
Arms fit
Shoulders fit - 2 shoulder hunch
Skinny waist
Skinny legs
Could be powered down
13 years too early
CMetz, on 11 December 2013 - 08:17 AM, said:
look at your upper arms again.
Definitively not a Wolverine, as it has those massive upper arm shields.
#51
Posted 11 December 2013 - 08:38 AM
Dadrick, on 11 December 2013 - 07:33 AM, said:
I just do not get the meaning of those humanoid arms. One of the few Clan OmniMechs which i remember have hands.. is .. the Kit Fox! But it is smaller, shorter and with bird legs. So no.
#52
Posted 11 December 2013 - 08:38 AM
Barantor, on 11 December 2013 - 08:22 AM, said:
IIC one is kinda similar.
Lower arms in no way line up, though I would kill for a Whammy IIC. Also makes no sense for them to be introducing the IICs yet, especially when we know they are focusing on the Clans right this moment, and that the concept art for the TimberWolf was done ages ago.
#53
Posted 11 December 2013 - 08:41 AM
#54
Posted 11 December 2013 - 08:42 AM
It looks a bit narrow for a Mauler, but the shadow is stretched, so I could see it being a Mauler.
Hard to say.
BTW, I am pretty sure PGI leaked it intentionally. The pic lacks SO much detail, it seems like a teaser.
#55
Posted 11 December 2013 - 08:45 AM
#56
Posted 11 December 2013 - 09:06 AM
#57
Posted 11 December 2013 - 09:12 AM
w0rm, on 11 December 2013 - 09:06 AM, said:
Ehhhh Still not sold. I no longer see a Mauler, but a rework of the Warhammer seems possible. I still don't like how the legs seem in the shadow. Plus the torso (when stretched like that) looks taller than what might apear on a Madcat (notice how long the arms are stretched, you would think the torso would jut WAY out for a Madcat). Also, the missile racks should seem taller I would think.
Of course this is all speculation anyway and who knows how the Traditional Madcat might be tweaked by PGI.
Still, I am not 100% sold on that being a Madcat.
#58
Posted 11 December 2013 - 09:26 AM
AgroAntirrhopus, on 10 December 2013 - 09:03 PM, said:
Were it the almight Timberwolf, the legs wouldn't be parallel with the torso.
You just recieved a like from me, for your signature. I don't knwo why, because I hate 3PV, but you still got a like.
Back on Topic...
It's clearly an Urbanmech!
#59
Posted 11 December 2013 - 09:35 AM
#60
Posted 11 December 2013 - 09:41 AM
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users