babadude71, on 02 January 2014 - 06:48 AM, said:
so putting solo new players up against teams and experienced players in your view is both fair and balanced?
Really doesn't matter if there is a newb in your team as long as there is a newb in the other team, saying that pre-made groups are bad is wrong as there are some that are full of fail (yes I know you havn't mentioned this but there are a few using your thread to jump on the band wagon, to say pre-made are bad) however it does make the fail that PGI call the matchmaker seem more extreme.
No i'm not saying ELO is bad, as it is a system that does work, but, but....
Only if there are enough people playing to make it stable..which clearly is not happening at all..
PGI do say there are matches that are poorly balanced but happen very rarely..
However they do not tell the community at what times of the day they happen more often, if I want a well balanced game i'm having to play after 10pm at night, its really not worth logging on between 4pm-9pm at what should be the uk's and europes 'prime' time because the match balancing is so god awful, there really isn't another way of expressing it without violating the forum code and ohh boy do I want to violate it and tell the people messing up this franchise what I think of them, for playing down what the community is telling them over and over again, the match maker is gauno.
Endless disconnects, endless imbalance after 18 months the match maker is still allowing games to start 2 short as in the OP example,(which is truely disgusting for a game that been out with so little in it, for so long) when it does manage to load 24 players the weighting of the matches is far worse than the 'metrics' PGi claim are accurate.
Its kind scarey that PGI are telling us UI2 will be released with bugs, when they can't make the bits they say are o.k, work properly often enough