

Confirmed Via Twitter, Next Mech Is 45 Tons. Calling Vindicator Right Now
#81
Posted 13 March 2014 - 04:45 AM
But my money's on the Vindicator. Mediocre or not, it's actually got some variety. The generic one is pretty meh, but there's variants that could go PPC/AC (1X) with full range of motion, a decent energy/missile mix (1SIC) of hardpoints, a faster 45 tonner period (1AA) which at this point would be the most nimble thing in it's tonnage, and the oversinked for TT but not for MWO -3L is an advanced-tech option too (though it'd have fewer hardpoints than the original).
#83
Posted 13 March 2014 - 07:34 AM
I understand the sentiment... The Vind won't do anything better than any other mech.
But looking ahead to CW and back on Lore, it makes perfect sense. Houses didn't have access to ALL mechs of ALL weight types, so they developed many different chassis of their own, that ended up being very similar in abilities/weaknesses as some mechs of their enemies.
Right now, while the game is nothing more than repeated pointless skirmishes, better mech variety would be great.
But, when CW launches with weight restrictions and you need a 35-50 ton mech, and your unit holds no worlds to make the BJ or HBK affordable, you may be very happy to realize that you can afford the Vindicator and flush out your unit for a full tonnage drop.
#84
Posted 13 March 2014 - 08:06 AM
Damocles69, on 12 March 2014 - 09:03 AM, said:
Competitive... No idea. But it was a solid combat unit that Capellan players should be happy to be getting.
#85
Posted 13 March 2014 - 08:31 AM
mwhighlander, on 12 March 2014 - 06:08 PM, said:
I have no idea what you're talking about

"33"
fnord
Joseph Mallan, on 13 March 2014 - 08:06 AM, said:
TT usefulness does not equal MW:O usefulness.

#86
Posted 13 March 2014 - 09:09 AM
Andross Deverow, on 13 March 2014 - 04:20 AM, said:
Regards
I've never even piloted a Shadowhawk, but I do like running circles around them in smaller lighter mediums. I think it would be nice to have another 45 ton mech as a companion to the Blackjack.
The Griffin is probably going to be my next chassis unless I like the looks of this new 45 tonner. The Griffin has incredible torso twist specs.
Jody
#87
Posted 13 March 2014 - 10:16 AM
Mechwarrior Mousse, on 12 March 2014 - 03:17 PM, said:

Glad to help

(Took me ages to get that blue shading correct around the yellow lettering, but I was pretty happy with the end result.)
#89
Posted 13 March 2014 - 10:27 AM
#90
Posted 13 March 2014 - 10:48 AM
Jody Von Jedi, on 13 March 2014 - 09:09 AM, said:
I've never even piloted a Shadowhawk, but I do like running circles around them in smaller lighter mediums. I think it would be nice to have another 45 ton mech as a companion to the Blackjack.
The Griffin is probably going to be my next chassis unless I like the looks of this new 45 tonner. The Griffin has incredible torso twist specs.
Jody
Yes it does, the Griffin is one of my favorite mechs for that exact reason.
#91
Posted 13 March 2014 - 10:59 AM

Alex Iglesias' Vindicator

Alex Iglesias' Wyvern
#92
Posted 13 March 2014 - 12:27 PM
#94
Posted 13 March 2014 - 01:12 PM
All the IS mechs are garbage in that weight class for quite some time...
#96
Posted 13 March 2014 - 01:26 PM

Le Wolftrap, from TRO 3050.
#97
Posted 13 March 2014 - 01:29 PM
#98
Posted 13 March 2014 - 02:20 PM
My money's on that mech.
#99
Posted 13 March 2014 - 02:30 PM
FupDup, on 12 March 2014 - 12:14 PM, said:
Stop trying to dismiss my personal experiences so that you're better positioned to criticize PGI. If the CN9-A is a viable and succcessful mech, you have little to stand on.
Edited by Rebas Kradd, 13 March 2014 - 02:32 PM.
#100
Posted 13 March 2014 - 02:36 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users