950 replies to this topic

[Nathan Foxbane]

RFMG567, on 10 April 2014 - 12:22 PM, said:

I was certain in MW4 it was symmetrical but ok

MW4 layout was not official table top record sheet friendly. MW4 uses MG arrays and not single MGs for starters (Which adds a .5 ton piece of equipment to 2-4 MGs, so even the base weight was off
). And the Timber Wolf mounts only 1 pulse laser not the 2 it has in MW4. Look at the loads in MW3. MW2, and here in MWO for true to table top weapons loadouts.

[Dawnstealer]

I can't wait to shoot that thing in the face!

[Appogee]

Jody Von Jedi, on 10 April 2014 - 12:27 PM, said:

does anyone recognize the 3rd map, also River City? IDK?

Yes, River City, at the lower spawn point, mouth of the river.

[KuroNyra]

aren't the leg's a bit to... Tall?
I remember the Timber Wolf to be with leg's much more...
"angled".

[Ngamok]

Daekar, on 10 April 2014 - 12:29 PM, said:

Very nice!
Legs too long and thick, but we may be compensated for that if the walk animation is awesome.

Cicada walk animation is the best.

[BLOOD WOLF]

THE LEGS!!!!, what happened to the legs? I like the upper but the legs

[RapidFire7]

Appogee, on 10 April 2014 - 12:29 PM, said:

86kph top speed, on a 75T Mech with a 375 engine. Is that consistent with the usual engine/speed formula?

Perhaps a new speed formula, I can get up to 89.1kph on my Dragon Slayer with an XL400 (and that is with speed tweak too)

[Magic Murder Bag]

Vyrago, on 10 April 2014 - 12:27 PM, said:

Gah! thats horrible! the concept art was much better. this thing is an abortion.

Disappointed in PGI lately, content is really slowing and sub-par.

SO glad Titanfall is out.

Usually the conversion from concept art to ingame 3D is never perfect.

[Jabbershark]

No refunds.

[Magitek]

I already bought this a little while back. Seeing the Timber Wolf in screens is just great

Now I request a cockpit view and a level view of the front, sides, and back.

[3rdworld]

Appogee, on 10 April 2014 - 12:29 PM, said:

86kph top speed, on a 75T Mech with a 375 engine. Is that consistent with the usual engine/speed formula?

Doesn't seem right

16.2*375 / 75 = 81kph without tweak * 1.1 = 89.1kph

[Ngamok]

Magitek, on 10 April 2014 - 12:35 PM, said:

I already bought this a little while back. Seeing the Timber Wolf in screens is just great

Now I request a cockpit view and a level view of the front, sides, and back.

And "undercarriage"?

[Eddrick]

Nice to see some screen shots of the TimberWolf. It looks like atleast 1/2 of the Mech is all Legs. Forget, the Missile Pods being to easy to hit. You almost can't help, but hit those Legs.

[ImperialParadox]

That thing is very leggy, reminds me of the Shadowhawk. Also, those launchers might draw a lot of fire when you think you are safely behind a ridge. I guess I'd have to see it in motion, I'm sort of neutral on it, though I think its legs should be more angled.

The real question will be how the hitboxes work on that thing.

[Archon]

It looks cool but very "blocky" for a clan mech, especially the legs.

[Gorthaur]

wow the legs are freaking huge..... and the arms are so huge and boxy (the upper arm not the weapon pods).... kind of disappointing but im happy to see an in game clan mech

Edited by Gorthaur, 10 April 2014 - 12:43 PM.

[Nicholas Carlyle]

Money, money, money, money,

MONNNEEEEYYYY.

Love how it's been what? 3 weeks since we've had a command chair update, or really anything of real substance.

But here comes the Timberwolf!

[BLOOD WOLF]

Just Fix the legs and where good http://www.sarna.net...e:MadCat_2.jpeg

[MisterPlanetarian]

Appogee, on 10 April 2014 - 12:29 PM, said:

86kph top speed, on a 75T Mech with a 375 engine. Is that consistent with the usual engine/speed formula?

Not including speed tweak i guess.

[Iqfish]

OH MY GOD IM SO [redacted]