Ecm On More Mechs!
#21
Posted 29 April 2014 - 03:23 AM
Get rid of the umbrella and make ECM work only on the mech that equips it and maybe we can think about increasing the number of mechs with ECM.
#22
Posted 29 April 2014 - 03:32 AM
But before any discussion about adding ECMs, they should fix it first i.e. make the gap between a normal mech and an ECM mech smaller. Perhaps something along the lines in my signature...
#23
Posted 29 April 2014 - 07:09 AM
Edited by Kitsune Kaji, 29 April 2014 - 07:11 AM.
#24
Posted 29 April 2014 - 07:13 AM
Rasc4l, on 29 April 2014 - 03:32 AM, said:
But before any discussion about adding ECMs, they should fix it first i.e. make the gap between a normal mech and an ECM mech smaller. Perhaps something along the lines in my signature...
Also the commando spider and cicada are not at the top of their weight class so that leaves the raven and ddc.....so most is not fair. and most do over 120 so their weakness is armor so they are not ganna be standing still giving the big boys ecm cover. normally, there are some people who do take that risk. as for poptarting ecm mechs...the spider is the only one who could but if they are poptarting and falling back out of visual range anyway not much difference if they had ecm other then you wouldn't get a red tag showing them doing it. Also the only things ecm does in hinder lock on misses and your ability to see the enemy. so the people complaining about lrms being op cant be complaining about ecm. but my lasers srm and all my ballistics don't seem to mind ecm. poptarters don't know were ecm mechs are until they see them visualy so it hinders poptarters too. huh seems ecm is brining balance to the aspects of the game people are ranting about LRMS and POPTARTS. lastly is the visual well it ads an element of surprise and hesitation some people should have. put seismics on and tag/narc.
Edited by Kitsune Kaji, 29 April 2014 - 07:33 AM.
#25
Posted 29 April 2014 - 11:13 AM
#26
Posted 29 April 2014 - 11:46 AM
#27
Posted 11 May 2014 - 07:21 AM
#28
Posted 11 May 2014 - 07:30 AM
Screech, on 11 May 2014 - 07:21 AM, said:
Ironically, the Jenner (specifically, the JR7-D) was originally slated to have ECM capability, but uproar from the playerbase at the time resulted in it being pulled. And people say "PGI never listens to the 'community'"...
#29
Posted 11 May 2014 - 08:41 AM
Strum Wealh, on 11 May 2014 - 07:30 AM, said:
Yeah, I remember that as well. As you can tell I am still a little butt hurt over it but I think I am getting better.
#30
Posted 12 May 2014 - 07:35 AM
i laugh at mechs that wasted the tonnage and slots on ECM while they get the rain of death, and laugh even harder at people complaining ECM is 'op' - it's only 'op' to people who don't know how to use LRMs
#31
Posted 12 May 2014 - 07:54 AM
Edited by SoHxPaladin, 12 May 2014 - 07:56 AM.
#32
Posted 12 May 2014 - 12:31 PM
#33
Posted 12 May 2014 - 12:51 PM
- ECM reworked and properly implemented.
- Reimagined Information Warfare.
- ECM allowed on all chassis.
- Profit!!!
#34
Posted 12 May 2014 - 01:36 PM
#35
Posted 12 May 2014 - 04:45 PM
#36
Posted 12 May 2014 - 07:55 PM
#37
Posted 15 May 2014 - 04:41 PM
If they want the present form of ECM too they can make it the Angel ECM and make it weigh 5 tons or something.
#38
Posted 15 May 2014 - 04:57 PM
#39
Posted 15 May 2014 - 04:58 PM
Dragons or Quickdraws get my vote. They're relatively unloved and no heavies currently have ECM.
If any assaults, the Awesome. The -9Q upgrade for the 8Q -> 9M would make it reasonable to give either the ECM option, and it, like the -D-DC has a big target for an ECM location, so it wouldn't be too difficult to knock out.
#40
Posted 15 May 2014 - 06:00 PM
6 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users