

#41
Posted 05 May 2014 - 08:43 PM
Now, assuming you can fix that, it looks like a Warhawk, but really, put the LRM rack where its supposed to be.
#42
Posted 05 May 2014 - 08:56 PM
Sstaan, on 05 May 2014 - 08:43 PM, said:
Now, assuming you can fix that, it looks like a Warhawk, but really, put the LRM rack where its supposed to be.
IIRC, the original 3050 TRO had the LRM on the arm. It just looked like it was on the torso.
#43
Posted 06 May 2014 - 01:38 AM
Edited by Joseph Mallan, 06 May 2014 - 01:38 AM.
#45
Posted 06 May 2014 - 02:02 AM
If anything, I treat a fourth ERPPC as a spare in case one is knocked out in a critical hit.
I wrote a whole review on how to play the Warhawk in all of its canon configurations on the BattleTech forums a few months ago, but that'll be different in MWO.
Edited by TELEFORCE, 06 May 2014 - 02:02 AM.
#46
Posted 06 May 2014 - 02:08 AM
TELEFORCE, on 06 May 2014 - 02:02 AM, said:
If anything, I treat a fourth ERPPC as a spare in case one is knocked out in a critical hit.
I wrote a whole review on how to play the Warhawk in all of its canon configurations on the BattleTech forums a few months ago, but that'll be different in MWO.
Ammo doesn't cook off here, you just fire and shut down then take a bit of Structure damage. Or Stagger fire 2-2
Edited by Joseph Mallan, 06 May 2014 - 02:08 AM.
#47
Posted 06 May 2014 - 02:12 AM
Sstaan, on 05 May 2014 - 08:43 PM, said:
Now, assuming you can fix that, it looks like a Warhawk, but really, put the LRM rack where its supposed to be.
Warhawk's missile rack is exactly where it's supposed to.
#48
Posted 06 May 2014 - 02:43 AM
#50
Posted 06 May 2014 - 02:50 AM
Joseph Mallan, on 06 May 2014 - 02:45 AM, said:

Well, I double checked with TRO, LRM10 in Prime is actually in LA.
I have a old sculpt mini on my desk that has it in ST (four tubes on the hood, six under it, by the cockpit), but it was just original artist's license back in the 80's, or maybe they wanted to have sculpts that were easier to cast back then.
Regardless, I'm happy that the follow plain, TRO data rather than inconsistent and often wonky visions of various artists that did mechs for TT over the years.
Edited by ssm, 06 May 2014 - 02:51 AM.
#51
Posted 06 May 2014 - 02:53 AM
ssm, on 06 May 2014 - 02:50 AM, said:
I have a old sculpt mini on my desk that has it in ST (four tubes on the hood, six under it, by the cockpit), but it was just original artist's license back in the 80's, or maybe they wanted to have sculpts that were easier to cast back then.
Regardless, I'm happy that the follow plain, TRO data rather than inconsistent and often wonky visions of various artists that did mechs for TT over the years.
Since when?

1990 art.
Edited by Joseph Mallan, 06 May 2014 - 02:54 AM.
#52
Posted 06 May 2014 - 02:56 AM
#54
Posted 06 May 2014 - 03:01 AM
ssm, on 06 May 2014 - 02:57 AM, said:

Look at crit table - that's where actually LRM rack is.
Where the heck is that Sheet from? I don't see Catlab ™ on it.
Just Checked my 3050 UpGrade... They did move it in the TRO but not in the art!

Edited by Joseph Mallan, 06 May 2014 - 03:05 AM.
#55
Posted 06 May 2014 - 03:04 AM
#56
Posted 06 May 2014 - 03:07 AM
Joseph Mallan, on 06 May 2014 - 02:53 AM, said:

1990 art.
the tro art is spurious a mix of prime and alt A omni pods perhaps but the lrm rack was defenatly on the LA.
just that pgi {alex} decided to draw it low slung instead of following the original examples.



this art above was used for the BT cards.... wrong arm

however shoulder pods do get clumsy if over done
Edited by GalaxyBluestar, 06 May 2014 - 03:08 AM.
#57
Posted 06 May 2014 - 03:08 AM

The set of that is Before the arm

Edited by Joseph Mallan, 06 May 2014 - 03:17 AM.
#58
Posted 06 May 2014 - 03:08 AM
Joseph Mallan, on 06 May 2014 - 03:01 AM, said:
Just Checked my 3050 UpGrade... They did move it in the TRO but not in the art!

Frankly, I don't know - I guess it was custom-made. I don't have access to my TROs or SSW at the moment, so I went with google on this one

As in TRO, they didn't really move it - it was always there, just the artist designing it back in 80s envisioned it being in LT, rather than arm. RS always looked like this.
Joseph Mallan, on 06 May 2014 - 03:08 AM, said:

Except placing it under arm is kinda more lore-compliant. LRM is actual omnipod, and from Clanners standpoint - it far easier and practical to de-slung from under the LA assembly than tinker with whole shoulder.
Those are omni-pods after all, they should look like being easy to remove-replace outside factory conditions.
Edited by ssm, 06 May 2014 - 03:12 AM.
#60
Posted 06 May 2014 - 03:11 AM
GalaxyBluestar, on 06 May 2014 - 03:07 AM, said:
the tro art is spurious a mix of prime and alt A omni pods perhaps but the lrm rack was defenatly on the LA.
just that pgi {alex} decided to draw it low slung instead of following the original examples.



however shoulder pods do get clumsy if over done
I have Several Warhawks Both old and new. That Shoulder pod is... new! And it HAS moved.
ssm, on 06 May 2014 - 03:08 AM, said:

As in TRO, they didn't really move it - it was always there, just the artist designing it back in 80s envisioned it being in LT, rather than arm. RS always looked like this.
If you check it, check all the TRO3050s(Revised,Upgrade & Update as well). I am positive it is not Arm mounted originally.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users