Your sarcastic NOTE is duly noted Shar, however it does not fit my commentary on this forum. So, please move on. Btw, there is a such thing as "written tone." You have a reasonably large body of work doing exactly what you describe as a defender of PGI on this forum. Blanket approval and constant defense that goes personal is just the sort of thing you are decrying atm.
100's of posts about how bad it is might just be a symptom of the user base dissatisfaction with the game. It's not like those people are crying wolf most of the time. There are problems with the game. Doesn't matter how often they complain about them. What matters is whether PGI fixes the issues and the
perception among players on how PGI handles things.
darkkterror, on 24 May 2014 - 07:41 PM, said:
Sure, people can disagree with the state of the game. The real question is: Can people disagree on the state of the game without taking direct/indirect stabs at each other? The comment I quoted included such a stab at the other side.
Sure, plenty of us do. The REAL question is, why can't people debate something on here without it becoming a polarizing, sarcastic shitfest that derails discussions? Consider your sarcastic and pithy response an example of just what I'm referring to. Yes, he took a shot. Was it more helpful to simply do the same (as you did) or argue the merits of the underlying issues.
Now, I'm not redressing you in particular DTerror, but the fact remains, there's no room for actual discussion, pro-or-con around here precisely because people feel compelled to simply further polarize the issue and snipe at each other over petty bullshit. Doesn't matter who started it, no one HAS to continue it.
It's easier to just identify who's a poor human being and add them to forum-ignore (one feature I think PGI got right around here), rather than get into a pissing match back and forth over nothing of substance because it certainly doesn't make someone look good, knowledgeable or reasonable to do the latter.
If someone wants to appear as a reasonable person that debates the merits of things, they can put aside sarcastic rejoinders and unneeded personal attacks. Two wrongs don't make a right in other words.
p8ragon, on 24 May 2014 - 07:45 PM, said:
....and we were doing so well with the thread.
Doesn't take much to get back to that I wager.