I feel disappointed.
I know, you can argue there was new information given (especially about clan configs), but overall, I read something different:
In nearly all answers, there was a "oh, yes, we're on that, too, it's on the list" - but always pointing at the clan launch.
I do accept that it's important, financially and because they need to deliver. All the really specific infos were about clans. I really miss any real information about all the other important stuff. Starting with UI2.0 (We have a document we'll read soon), via meta game (ghost heat was meant to restrict pinpoint damage??!? Well, that worked out fine, didn't it?) right up to CW (it will be "more than that" - still, very unspecific. I would bet it will be minimum viable, with a simple win or loss counter to reflect the influence on the invasion).
I'm not too sure whether these guys actually know their own game. Especially when it came down to what did they see in the tournament. That answer sounds like "oh, we finally actually looked into people playing".
Overall, I'll say this. Thanks for the time and the info - I don't think, though, that you're living up to your promise of "doubling down on communication". Just for UI2.0 alone, there were more than 200 pages of official feedback (plus countless user opened topics) - I didn't see any of your double communication there, tbh. Not even starting on all those other topics like ghost heat, meta game, ecm, cw, and many more.
Edited by DasAmok, 23 May 2014 - 05:28 AM.