Regarding Reddit
#981
Posted 11 September 2014 - 04:36 AM
#982
Posted 11 September 2014 - 04:36 AM
#983
Posted 11 September 2014 - 04:39 AM
DV McKenna, on 10 September 2014 - 11:44 AM, said:
It's what you do to people here; why should you be different on 3rd party sites?
Will this make you think about how you operate here and have treated people recently?
/qft
/agree
/signed
Edited by Nightfire, 11 September 2014 - 04:40 AM.
#984
Posted 11 September 2014 - 04:40 AM
#985
Posted 11 September 2014 - 04:42 AM
http://themittani.co...l-transreversal
#986
Posted 11 September 2014 - 04:48 AM
#989
Posted 11 September 2014 - 04:59 AM
redlance, on 10 September 2014 - 07:47 PM, said:
This is excessive and ridiculous.
The thought of wishing harm, not just harm but complete life failure, just because somebody took a video game in a direction you're not happy with... is.... moronic.
PGI has made some mistakes, treated their community like crap, and ruined some aspects of a video game. All of it could be fixed. The question is, will they try to?
And even if they don't, wishing illness and destitution and divorce on them just makes you look like a [voluntarily redacted].
#990
Posted 11 September 2014 - 05:01 AM
#991
Posted 11 September 2014 - 05:07 AM
Yiphyin, on 11 September 2014 - 05:01 AM, said:
The problem is not wholly with Niko. It's with the people sitting in the big plush chairs ignoring common sense in favor of cash grabbing. Greed is a filthy beast and brings out the worst in man.
#992
Posted 11 September 2014 - 05:09 AM
Cavale, on 10 September 2014 - 10:16 PM, said:
Yep, they done goofed on Reddit.
And then they done goofed on here.
And, IMHO, goofed on some kind of recreational chemicals of epic proportions for weeks to get to the point where Transverse seemed reasonable, creating a reddit in an attempt to build an advertising cross-linking spam machine controlled by PGI (hint: buy ads next time) for free, and then opening their mouth (via Niko) to complain about it in some of the most unprofessional language I have seen from a gaming company to date.
All those Founder's tags say this is -our- turf. To many's eternal shame, we paid for the place, and this is the forum to which people who paid for and/or play the game come. People saw something being done badly and actually cared enough to come here and say something about it, even after being totally disenchanted with PGI's products. We're the founders- you know, from which the word "foundation" also derives, the guys and gals who put out the money to make this place exist in the first place, and quite often more atop that to help keep it going, on the promises of the folks in PGI that it'd be used well.
Many of us disagree with that, especially with the current actions that precipitated this thread. This is the result. And Niko, my good sir, started the entire avalanche with his initial post. He did wrong, then he stood on the front lawn and complained about getting the company's knuckles smacked with a ruler. Reap what you sow.
#993
Posted 11 September 2014 - 05:10 AM
Just lol.
#994
Posted 11 September 2014 - 05:11 AM
#995
Posted 11 September 2014 - 05:14 AM
Yiphyin, on 11 September 2014 - 05:11 AM, said:
If only founders had votes equivalent to the value of the package they purchased and could actually participate in company directives with that voting power.
#997
Posted 11 September 2014 - 05:17 AM
the main difference is that CCP recognized reality eventually and actually refocused the game on what people wanted, rather than just continuing to be {Richard Cameron} about it
#998
Posted 11 September 2014 - 05:18 AM
Jason1138, on 11 September 2014 - 05:17 AM, said:
the main difference is that CCP recognized reality eventually and actually refocused the game on what people wanted, rather than just continuing to be {Richard Cameron} about it
Is this the monocle debacle were talking about regarding CCP?
#999
Posted 11 September 2014 - 05:18 AM
#1000
Posted 11 September 2014 - 05:19 AM
Having voting be by Founder's tags would kinda limit the community interaction to just the old guard and that would add to people thinking they weren't listened to if they didn't have a founder's tag.
10 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 10 guests, 0 anonymous users