Mcgral18, on 16 September 2014 - 09:46 AM, said:
I can be on any time tonight...Are you going to let me Wub you?
Let me show you my Epeen!
MOAR WUB
.
What is that? lol
Screenshots from months or years ago, before unit tags were implemented (note the LNW tags).
Do what I did. Post screenshots you took from
today!!
DarthRevis, on 16 September 2014 - 09:52 AM, said:
I play every night.....Come find me. NOOB
Here is the info for our TS,
IP: 184.82.141.207
PW: StranaMechty
Look for the Skull and Crossbones, Same name.
Come put your money where you mouth is...
All you have done is be rude, aggressive and insult everyone who opposed your comments. IF this will shut you up i am game.
.
I asked what time you're on. You said "tonight" as if I would know what timezone you're in.
What makes you think I have any interest in talking to someone who doesn't have the sense to specify if they're on american or european time?
.
edit -
Carrioncrows, on 16 September 2014 - 10:32 AM, said:
If LRM's are overpower without ECM
Then LRM's were always overpowered and need adjusted.
Balancing the entirety of LRM's and Streaks off of a 1.5 ton module that only 6 mechs (9 variants out of 150+) can use is the very definition of insanity.
.
If LRM's are overpowered, then why do many forum posters propose nerfing ECM further?
That in my eyes, is more insane than anything.
There's nothing wrong with balancing missiles off of rare equipment like ECM.
I find it strange how many of you choose to support the tabletop rules when it gives you a "reason" to nerf jump jets in claiming that canon battletech says jumpjets are for maneuverability only.
And, yet many of you go against the tabletop rules when it says that ECM is a rare component. Given that you favor more than a small number of mechs having the ability to mount ECM.
So, there is essentially a massive double standard people have when it comes to classic battletech and the rules they choose to follow. They tend to cherry pick whichever perspective supports their own bias. And they tend to be extremely inconsistent which translates to inaccuracy.
Edited by I Zeratul I, 16 September 2014 - 12:28 PM.