Mechwarrior Buddah, on 07 October 2014 - 08:30 PM, said:
Giving players "what they want" despite of whether or not its a good idea. THATS the point
Sadly, "A good idea" is extremely subjective. I get that you feel your view of what is and isn't a good idea is the absolute truth, but it's sadly just not that simple.
For all this time, we've complained that PGI doesn't listen to us, that they don't listen to feedback, that they don't act of feedback.
Whether or not you like this, its absolutely:
A: Russ proposing a feature to tighten up Elo matching, and then soliciting feedback, including a direct "do you want this?" forum poll.
B: Russ acting on that feedback
C: Russ
again asking for feedback once the feature is live, and actively engaging us on said feature in multiple forum threads. And a second "Do you want this?" poll once people have seen it live.
This is
exactly what players have been asking for since I started playing at least, back in 2012.
The only way this could theoretically be better is if they'd used the test servers, but in this instance that couldn't work properly -insufficient and potentially biased participation would skew results. You'd need to test this live to get adequate numbers.
Edited by Wintersdark, 07 October 2014 - 08:46 PM.