23 replies to this topic

[Ronin X]

I hijacked this and started another thread to get it more exposure. Please vote

http://mwomercs.com/...vsacceleration/

[AlmightyAeng]

Very cool. Voted. No, in every category.

[kapusta11]

Why there is no option "reastore PPC projectile speed to 1500-2000"? Voted no everywhere though I could live with charge if the shared limit would be 2 for Gauss and PPC and they synced perfectly.

Edited by kapusta11, 16 October 2014 - 07:30 AM.

[Mechteric]

Opening a thread to link to another is frowned upon, prepare to be locked!

[kapusta11]

CapperDeluxe, on 16 October 2014 - 07:28 AM, said:

Opening a thread to link to another is frowned upon, prepare to be locked!

What's so bad about polls?

[Karl Streiger]

kapusta11, on 16 October 2014 - 07:28 AM, said:

What's so bad about polls?

not the polls the cross linking

[kapusta11]

Karl Streiger, on 16 October 2014 - 07:30 AM, said:

not the polls the cross linking

The link is there because you can't create poll here. So what's so bad about them?

[Mechteric]

kapusta11, on 16 October 2014 - 07:28 AM, said:

What's so bad about polls?

This thread isn't the poll, the linked thread is.

http://mwomercs.com/...nduct-expanded/

Unconstructive / Spamming
...
Creating posts only to cross-link to other posts.

[UnsafePilot]

kapusta11, on 16 October 2014 - 07:31 AM, said:

The link is there because you can't create poll here. So what's so bad about them?

Since we can't create them here it's a pretty safe assumption that creating it somewhere else and then linking from here would be frowned upon as well.

[kapusta11]

CapperDeluxe, on 16 October 2014 - 07:31 AM, said:

This thread isn't the poll, the linked thread is.

http://mwomercs.com/...nduct-expanded/

Unconstructive / Spamming
...
Creating posts only to cross-link to other posts.

User's pedantry goes against common sense here. Go report then like a good boy you are.

UnsafePilot, on 16 October 2014 - 07:35 AM, said:

Since we can't create them here it's a pretty safe assumption that creating it somewhere else and then linking from here would be frowned upon as well.

Why it is not allowed to create polls here in the first place. What's so bad about them?

Edited by kapusta11, 16 October 2014 - 07:36 AM.

[Malcolm Vordermark]

kapusta11, on 16 October 2014 - 07:35 AM, said:

User's pedantry goes against common sense here. Go report then like a good boy you are.




Why it is not allowed to create polls here in the first place. What's so bad about them?

Nobody said the poll was bad, nobody said they were reporting the thread. They said that cross linking is frowned upon and this thread will likely be locked because of it. Most likely, it is a house keeping issue.

Edited by Rouken, 16 October 2014 - 07:50 AM.

[mogs01gt]

I voted no to all of them. Buffing PPC's will simply push the game towards long range sniper matches where high armor mechs are over powered.

[Glythe]

Brawling weapons have been terrible since pretty much the med laser nerf and the SRM 6 nerfs (different patches).

Short range weapons need to be the highest damage weapons for the weight for the heat because range is a huge advantage.

Vote No on everything for balance.

[Joseph Mallan]

Ghost Badger, on 16 October 2014 - 07:11 AM, said:

Very cool. Voted. No, in every category.

I actually voted yes to the Charging Mechanic. BUT it would need to be different than the Gauss Charge as it has a longer Min range.

[AlmightyAeng]

Edit: DAMNIT JOE! I had a meme and everything and you ruin it 10 seconds before I post

Edited by Ghost Badger, 16 October 2014 - 08:40 AM.

[Angel of Annihilation]

There is absolutely nothing wrong with PPCs. My Timber Wolf prime uses a pair of them as its primary go to weapons system and I have absolutely zero trouble using them both in long range combat or to brawl with. They are definitely a high skill weapon as they are now but as long as you develop that skill, they are fine.

Please keep in mind guys, just because they are harder to use now doesn't mean they are bad or need a buff.

[Joseph Mallan]

Ghost Badger, on 16 October 2014 - 08:40 AM, said:

Edit: DAMNIT JOE! I had a meme and everything and you ruin it 10 seconds before I post

My work here is done!

[Ultimax]

Glythe, on 16 October 2014 - 08:36 AM, said:

Brawling weapons have been terrible since pretty much the med laser nerf and the SRM 6 nerfs (different patches).

Short range weapons need to be the highest damage weapons for the weight for the heat because range is a huge advantage.

Vote No on everything for balance.

Short ranged weapons already do have the highest damage for weight and for the heat.

[Xarian]

PPC speed got nerfed for a reason. It's an energy-based AC/10.

Want to increase PPC speed? Let's increase AC/10 speed as well.

1100-1150 is a reasonable speed.

[Glythe]

Ultimatum X, on 16 October 2014 - 09:26 AM, said:

Short ranged weapons already do have the highest damage for weight and for the heat.

No they don't.

Clan medium laser has 40% range advantage and about 12% more heat.

The IS medium laser really needs a rollback of the laser heat nerf to compensate. What I'm trying to say here is that the damage benefit isn't high enough to compensate for really short range. The addition of longer range "standard" clan weapons made it worse. And they didn't even rollback the nerfs.


SRMs require artemis to not be crap. But they are still pretty lame compared to how they were when they had extra damage per missile and large explosive profiles that overlapped and caused extra damage.

SSRMs are just ruined when you consider how the IS version used to function; and now the clan version is just better (but not as good as the old version).

We aren't back to the days of PPC brawling but we really aren't where we should be with the close range weapons.

Edited by Glythe, 16 October 2014 - 07:17 PM.