Dervish: Upgraded
#1
Posted 11 November 2014 - 05:23 AM
It really needed upgrading. The mech had potential...it was just ugly (IMHO). So, there is an image on the web that BLaaR made a paper model from that is just awesome.
And I have used his work to make a model kit of the new and improved Dervish. This baby is completely hand made...no 3D printing here.
Parts:
And quickly slapped together:
The arms and hips have ball & socket joints so it can be easily posed. This last pic is with the 11" Armorcast Atlas.
#2
Posted 11 November 2014 - 06:01 AM
#3
Posted 11 November 2014 - 06:22 AM
#4
Posted 11 November 2014 - 11:34 AM
TheTeacher, on 11 November 2014 - 05:23 AM, said:
It really needed upgrading. The mech had potential...it was just ugly (IMHO). So, there is an image on the web that BLaaR made a paper model from that is just awesome.
And I have used his work to make a model kit of the new and improved Dervish. This baby is completely hand made...no 3D printing here.
Parts:
And quickly slapped together:
The arms and hips have ball & socket joints so it can be easily posed. This last pic is with the 11" Armorcast Atlas.
fantastic! My only knock is the laser is supposed to be on the outside of the arm paddle, but that's minor. Overall, very very cool!
#5
Posted 11 November 2014 - 11:58 AM
TheTeacher, on 11 November 2014 - 05:23 AM, said:
It really needed upgrading. The mech had potential...it was just ugly (IMHO). So, there is an image on the web that BLaaR made a paper model from that is just awesome.
And I have used his work to make a model kit of the new and improved Dervish. This baby is completely hand made...no 3D printing here.
This is really impressive! What material did you use? Some sort of resin?
#6
Posted 11 November 2014 - 12:55 PM
Odanan, on 11 November 2014 - 11:58 AM, said:
I think it's similar to what Almeras used to do(still does?) He finds plans for a mech paper craft and makes it instead of paper, in styrene sheet. I think he then takes that and makes a mould and casts it.
At least I think that's how it's done. Hope this helps
-ace
#7
Posted 11 November 2014 - 02:37 PM
Bishop: Dude...really? Look at the flow of those arms. Having lasers on the side would not be aesthetically pleasing.
Odanan: The masters are made of plastic then rubber molds are made from those and copies are cast in resin.
#8
Posted 11 November 2014 - 03:08 PM
Seriously though, love your Dervish model, really wish I could make this stuff!
Edited by White Bear 84, 11 November 2014 - 03:14 PM.
#10
Posted 11 November 2014 - 04:46 PM
#11
Posted 11 November 2014 - 06:59 PM
TheTeacher, on 11 November 2014 - 02:37 PM, said:
Bishop: Dude...really? Look at the flow of those arms. Having lasers on the side would not be aesthetically pleasing.
Odanan: The masters are made of plastic then rubber molds are made from those and copies are cast in resin.
I'm just pointing out where they go, Where ya decide to put thm is up to you, the artist, but I would not dislike them on the outside, lol
#12
Posted 13 November 2014 - 03:50 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 11 November 2014 - 06:59 PM, said:
Where did you get that info? The mini has them over the SRMs and the Battletech Wiki states: The lasers are placed just above the launchers and ensure the 'Mech is still capable of fighting should it run out of missiles
Edited by TheTeacher, 13 November 2014 - 03:50 PM.
#13
Posted 13 November 2014 - 07:26 PM
TheTeacher, on 13 November 2014 - 03:50 PM, said:
Where did you get that info? The mini has them over the SRMs and the Battletech Wiki states: The lasers are placed just above the launchers and ensure the 'Mech is still capable of fighting should it run out of missiles
#14
Posted 13 November 2014 - 07:31 PM
#16
Posted 14 November 2014 - 08:31 AM
TheTeacher, on 14 November 2014 - 07:29 AM, said:
It's not a perspective issue.
The drawing predates the mini. Thats why I circled both. You can see the housing on the outside. Later drawings lost that, and the Mini was based off the 3050 TRO, not the 3025. And the 3050 TRO pretty well butchered everything, and had massive editing discrepancies between the two, but pretty much all future publications used the 3050 stuff as grail. Heck, show me, on the original 3025 design, just where on top the lasers are? There is nothing on top.
Argue all you like, it's not a knock on your Model which is awesome, just one of the many discrepancies (like adding LA and hand actuators to the KGC) that fell between the cracks in editing.
Also, neither the 3025 or 3050 TRO lists "The lasers are placed just above the launchers and ensure the 'Mech is still capable of fighting should it run out of missiles ", and the 3039 (printed waaaay later) remarks simply "strapped on top". Based off the bad editing of the 3050 TRO and it's horrible art.
All I am saying is that ORIGINALLY, and how I personally prefer, the lasers, were, indeed, in the sides.
Edited by Bishop Steiner, 14 November 2014 - 08:33 AM.
#17
Posted 14 November 2014 - 09:01 PM
The only thing I do not like about print version above is the lack of a recessed housing for the lasers. It leaves the forearm too blocky.
Edited by Nathan Foxbane, 14 November 2014 - 09:03 PM.
#18
Posted 14 November 2014 - 09:49 PM
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users