Can Someone Please Explain To Me...
#1
Posted 12 November 2014 - 06:59 PM
#2
Posted 12 November 2014 - 07:05 PM
#3
Posted 12 November 2014 - 07:31 PM
Also, from a lore perspective, it's the only weapon that uses inert ammo. So the ammo doesn't explode, but the downside is that it uses very heavy duty capacitors, that generate a lot of energy, and when they go critical, they go CRITICAL. It's like a mini reactor exploding inside your mech. While most of the other weapons are made of inert parts that will just get wrecked when the weapon is destroyed.
This game does require skill, especially when it comes to aiming, positioning, and situational awareness. However, most shown in the public queue, whom you end up with on your team feels a lot more like rolling dice. One drop you have people that work together, the next you've got people that don't know which way is north with 4 compasses, and a GPS in their hands.
EDIT1: (More mechanical explanation in edit2, and spoiler)
EDIT2:
Here's why it feels like it has a 50% chance of being destroyed:
Edited by IraqiWalker, 12 November 2014 - 07:40 PM.
#4
Posted 12 November 2014 - 07:32 PM
As for your second post.. yes.. it does require a little skill on the pilot's part to gather info, use the gathered info and execute maneuvers to enhance the pilot's survivability according to the info gathered. But it also requires coordination as you drop into battle with eleven other players in your team. Knowing how to "Lead a target" when using long range projectiles. Heat management so you don't nuke yourself during combat. Armor placement and weapon grouping that suit your playstyle.
Adjusting keyboard/mouse/joystick button settings to enhance your ability to participate in battle. (raising/lowering sensitivity/acceleration so you're not whipping your torso back and forth or moving too slow where you seem to be moving in molasses)
And searching the forums for answers and asking questions so you can get a better idea of how to function in the field.
Welcome to mechwarrior online, Mechwarrior! We hope you enjoy your time with us.
#5
Posted 12 November 2014 - 07:33 PM
I think to be successful in this game takes a high degree of skill (which I lack). But to have fun in this game does not (which I generally do).
If you're going to equip a gauss rifle, I recommend putting a CASE in that section to contain the blast when it does blow up. And certainly don't equip a gauss rifle in a side torso if you're running an XL engine.
#6
Posted 12 November 2014 - 07:34 PM
It takes a lot patience and either pop tarting, or peek a boo shots to get good with it. Not my cup of tea.
On your question regarding skill, yes it does require skill. Something as simple as learning to torso twist and keep your legs and torso lined up doesn't come natural to most new players. There is definitely a steep learning curve to MW:O
To Illustrate: I'm 46 and I've been playing MW games most of my adult life. My 15 year old nephew is a really good gamer, but he sucks at MW:O. He can't keep his torso straight and runs around like he's drunk. You would think a teenage gamer would be better at this than a middle aged man, but, I, at 46 am a much better pilot than he is.
MW:O has a steep learning curve, but I encourage you to stick with it. It's great fun and the community here is very willing to help new players like yourself.
Jody
#7
Posted 12 November 2014 - 07:41 PM
#8
Posted 12 November 2014 - 08:15 PM
EDIT:
http://mwomercs.com/...age__p__1474814
Look up CASE, in that post.
Edited by IraqiWalker, 12 November 2014 - 08:15 PM.
#9
Posted 12 November 2014 - 08:39 PM
#10
Posted 12 November 2014 - 08:55 PM
destroika, on 12 November 2014 - 08:39 PM, said:
Trust me, after a couple of weeks of using one Gauss rifle, you'll realize that all of this is barely enough to contain it.
Also, you don't need Case.
Case helps, but for the record, it's designed to stop ALL EXPLOSIONS from spreading to other sections. That's why Case is used to contain ammo bins. The fact that is somehow helps stop Gauss explosions is more of an added bonus.
Right now, I'm running 2 Gauss on some of my mechs, and I swear I feel a little bad about myself, and my targets, when they get vaporized before they even know what happened.
#11
Posted 13 November 2014 - 03:28 AM
1) Piloting your mech. This includes movement, shooting and hitting, heat management, twisting and getting under to avoid crippling damage, etc.
2) Battlefield awareness. Knowing when to attack and when to run away. Using your mechs strengths against an opponents weaknesses. Anticipating where the enemy is before your scout finds them. Knowing how to work with others even if they are PUGs.
Choosing a mech and outfitting it could be considered a skill, but you can simply copy what others have done and get the same result. Piloting and awareness must be learned.
#12
Posted 13 November 2014 - 04:17 AM
From a game design point of view, it's a weapon with few drawbacks. It's ability to put damage downrange is limited only by ammunition, whereas other ballsitics not only do less damage they also generate heat which must be kept below a dangerous threshhold.
The advantages of the gauss rifle are strong enough that in MWO it needed additional drawbacks, such as the charge mechanic, because otherwise 15 or 30 damage with a single point and click becomes the only weapon worth bringing.
Gauss rifles are one of the hardest weapons to use well, but they are still an important threat on the battlefield and when used well a Gauss mech can easily project damage across a large portion of the map at long enough range it is difficult to return fire.
#13
Posted 13 November 2014 - 03:30 PM
#14
Posted 13 November 2014 - 11:41 PM
First the critting was introduced but this was less of an issue for the then new Jagermechs that came out than the Cats with their XL engines. Somewhere along the way the charging mechanic was brought in to help stop the dual gaussing that was prevalent.
#15
Posted 14 November 2014 - 12:01 AM
Jody Von Jedi, on 12 November 2014 - 07:34 PM, said:
To Illustrate: I'm 46 and I've been playing MW games most of my adult life. My 15 year old nephew is a really good gamer, but he sucks at MW:O. He can't keep his torso straight and runs around like he's drunk. You would think a teenage gamer would be better at this than a middle aged man, but, I, at 46 am a much better pilot than he is.
MW:O has a steep learning curve, but I encourage you to stick with it. It's great fun and the community here is very willing to help new players like yourself.
Jody
Regarding this, I believe that some lore fluff is true in our reality.
Some are born mechwarriors and others not. There must be something genetical.
For instance, I haven't had any coordination problem since first time with mw2. Some friends of mine.... just terrible!!! Never been able to coordinate torso twisting and direction despite hours and hours of training
And this is strange, because in real life too you can walk in a direction while aiming in another one!
I think it's called "spatial awareness", or something.
Maybe it's the same issue with parking. I park my car in one maneuver, while some have to lose time parking the car in 10 moves (checkmate!)
Edited by Stefka Kerensky, 14 November 2014 - 12:05 AM.
#16
Posted 14 November 2014 - 08:39 AM
Or
Quote
The Caps one of the cases were Battletech used some real world truth. Capacitors in real life blow rather spectacularly, Check out youtube for videos of them being blown, there are alot of them. Imagine the size needed to run a Gauss Rifle and you have some truly big and explosive capacitors. Ever around when even a small cap blown trust me you will know it.
Truthfully 20 damage from Gauss rifle exploding isn't to bad. Considering a full ton of regular ammo does its damage times how many rounds are left in it, 1 ton LRM ammo 180 rounds = 180 damage, 1 ton AC2 75 rounds = 150 damage. The pain is knowing that 1) a gauss rifle if hit is pretty much for sure going to explode 2) even after gun is out of rounds it can still explode while empty ammo bin is well empty.
Edited by Mad Ox, 14 November 2014 - 08:45 AM.
#17
Posted 14 November 2014 - 08:55 AM
Gauss is a weapon contrary to the AC20 in fact almost opposite in that it is best fitted in arms with an xl and CASE in the arm with it and used at range. Wheras the AC20 is close range and more often than not (centurion/blackjack aside) fitted in the side torso with standard engines.
Edited by mad kat, 14 November 2014 - 09:01 AM.
#18
Posted 14 November 2014 - 09:59 AM
Inveramsay, on 13 November 2014 - 11:41 PM, said:
The charging mechanic was to make it harder to use with PPCs. There was that ~6 month period where you could one-shot anything with PPC x 2 + gauss or PPC + gauss x2. Also, it make it harder to line up shots in close range against fast mechs giving it another drawback.
#19
Posted 14 November 2014 - 01:16 PM
While it says the optimum range of the Gauss Rifle is 660 meters or so, it has the longest range of Every Single Weapon in the Game. This is accompanied with the fastest projectile speed (short of the MG which is instant), able to reach its target at its maximum range in less time than it took you to charge it up.
1,980 meters is the maximum range (though you'll do 0 damage at this range). At 1320 meters you will deal 7.5 damage. At 660 you will deal 15 damage.
For a comparison: At 450 meters the AC/10 does 10 damage, at 900 meters it deals 0 damage.
At 620 meters, the AC/5 deals 5 damage. At 1240 meters, it deals 0 damage.
LRMs "instantly" self destruct at 1,002 to 1,014 meters (depending on lag).
ER PPCs deal 10 (to 15) damage at 810 meters, but at 1,620 meters they deal 0 damage.
It is possible to equip 4 Gauss Rifles into a single mech.
If this game had standard armor and lore-based (lore-based, not TT based) weapons, the Gauss Rifle would be one of only 3 front-loaded damage weapons. It would also be the most powerful one shot ballistic weapon, only able to fire one at a time, and a single Gauss Rifle could instantly cockpit any enemy with a well placed shot. Of course, you could just as easily penetrate armor at just the right angle, nick someone's gyro, and laugh as you watch them kill themselves trying to get back onto their feet. ...Also everyone would live a lot longer than they do now with double armor/structure values + quirks.
(The other two weapons would be all missile types; but they would be plagued with incredibly slow reload times. And PPCs of all types [though the different types had variants that were not this way].)
Welcome to the front lines.
Quad Gauss, for fun.
Edited by Koniving, 14 November 2014 - 01:21 PM.
#20
Posted 14 November 2014 - 01:19 PM
Sarna ^
The thing that bugs me about them is the whole charge-up mechanic, since it doesn't really make a whole lot of sense for the thing to explode if the capacitors aren't charged. One or the other handicap is fine, both are dumb. Furthermore, the 2 gauss limit did more to nerf the gauss than the charge-up. I found it extremely easy to adapt to the charge-up mechanic in my Thunderbolt and the PPC/gauss projectile desynchronization did more to nerf that than the charge-up, though that was more of a PPC nerf than anything to do with gauss.
I really think it'd be neat if the gauss only exploded if it was critted during the charge and the amount of damage it did to the component it resided in ranged from 10 at the low end to 20 when it was fully charged. Also neat if you could hold the charge longer, accepting the risk of explosion for the convenience of ready fire. The whole thing could kind of use a rebalance, really. I mean, the whole reason that ghost heat was implemented was the PPFLD resulting from PPC spam. Alongside that, we had the dual-gauss K2 craze, the AC2 screen-shake stun-lock counter-spam for that, and the AC2 nerf into complete obsolescence.
Well, historical ranting aside, I think gauss was used as much as it was because it was just plain better than everything else after the implementation of ghost heat. How about, instead of nerfing every weapon in an unending chain of dissatisfaction, we take a page from more recent patches and buff weapons until they all have an actual purpose, like the recent pulse laser improvements? *cough*cough*cough*flamer*cough*cough*
Hah, Koniving posted the exact video I was thinking of when I said that the 2 gauss limit did more to nerf gauss than charge-up. Imagine if that beast could fire all four at once...
/edit: had to get rid of a bunch of [/color][color=#000000] that randomly inserted itself into my post for no reason I have been able to discern.
Edited by Tim East, 14 November 2014 - 01:23 PM.
5 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users