919 replies to this topic

[Aresye]

Noesis, on 01 January 2015 - 04:52 PM, said:

I mean representatives from Clan Wolf had pictures of RL animals in sexual congress as a way of representing their stance on CW related events and other non-wolf members kind of saw the humourous side and where able to interpret that it was related to the gaming content? Why should a symbolic cartoon drawing relating to CW events then be any more if not less offensive than that, even though the context is in relation to the game?

The wolf f****** the bear pic (let's be adults, that's what the pic was) wasn't even originally posted by us, but rather a CSJ member obviously amused by the situation, and if anything, the use was more in retaliation for all the threats and annoyances that have been directed to us here on the forums.

You however, have decided to hop on the bandwagon from the very start, and while your own retaliation has been directed at the wolves (despite doing absolutely nothing to you), the actual people who've been talking s*** about you and your unit is largely comprised of NOT wolves. I'd say the majority have actually been mostly your fellow bears, so there's that.

Now you've posted an image poking fun at a situation in which you had absolutely no involvement and has had no impact on your faction as a whole (if anything, it might have actually benefited you).

You're likening some light-hearted retaliation (what we did) into the same league as unprovoked aggression and trolling (what you did), and if you can't see the differences, I suggest dropping the big words and the pretentious persona, because you're obviously not as smart as you think you are.

[Naglinator]

Come on guys, this thread is SO 2014. Let's all kiss and make up.

[KharnZor]

Naglinator, on 01 January 2015 - 06:16 PM, said:

Come on guys, this thread is SO 2014. Let's all kiss and make up.

[Noesis]

Aresye, on 01 January 2015 - 06:11 PM, said:

Personal opinions

Thats an aweful lot of speculation to suggest I'm not involved with Community Warfare.

I guess Clan Wolf and associates consider themselves to be able to dictate how others should get involved with MWO CW?

Edited by Noesis, 01 January 2015 - 06:23 PM.

[IraqiWalker]

KharnZor, on 01 January 2015 - 06:20 PM, said:

I shouldn't have laughed. I shouldn't have laughed. I shouldn't have laughed. I shouldn't have laughed.

I laughed too hard. God, my sides.

[KharnZor]

IraqiWalker, on 01 January 2015 - 06:32 PM, said:

I shouldn't have laughed. I shouldn't have laughed. I shouldn't have laughed. I shouldn't have laughed.

I laughed too hard. God, my sides.

[Pat Kell]

Pariah, so you think it's better to put some a person of group of people over our rights of free discussion rather then letting people decide for themselves what they do and do not what to read? Of course the ignore button doesn't "fix" it for all people because people aren't perfect and what "fixes" it for you may "break" it for others. Giving people a choice is the best fix we have been able to come up with and those that disagree either want power over other people or don't want to be responsible for making their own choices.

[Gyrok]

Noesis, on 01 January 2015 - 06:21 PM, said:

Thats an aweful lot of speculation to suggest I'm not involved with Community Warfare.

I guess Clan Wolf and associates consider themselves to be able to dictate how others should get involved with MWO CW?

No, but we should be able to dictate content in our own forum on the game's website....

In other words...your welcome has been worn out.

[Noesis]

Gyrok, on 01 January 2015 - 08:14 PM, said:

No, but we should be able to dictate content in our own forum on the game's website....

In other words...your welcome has been worn out.

The forum doesnt belong to you.

[Gyrok]

Noesis, on 01 January 2015 - 08:16 PM, said:

The forum doesnt belong to you.

Neither does it belong to you.

[Lukoi Banacek]

Seriously...just use the ignore feature. You will feel better lol.

[Noesis]

Gyrok, on 01 January 2015 - 08:24 PM, said:

Neither does it belong to you.

I'm not claiming it does.

[dezgra]

I feel a whole lot better, now that this thread has hit 40 pages. If anybody cares, when it hits 50 pages I promise to smile.

[Ax2Grind]

dezgra, on 01 January 2015 - 08:34 PM, said:

I feel a whole lot better, now that this thread has hit 40 pages. If anybody cares, when it hits 50 pages I promise to smile.

I will hold you to that.

[Pariah Devalis]

Pat Kell, on 01 January 2015 - 07:28 PM, said:

Pariah, so you think it's better to put some a person of group of people over our rights of free discussion rather then letting people decide for themselves what they do and do not what to read? Of course the ignore button doesn't "fix" it for all people because people aren't perfect and what "fixes" it for you may "break" it for others. Giving people a choice is the best fix we have been able to come up with and those that disagree either want power over other people or don't want to be responsible for making their own choices.

Free discussion is one thing. Hell, dissenting opinion is perfectly fine. However RP is no excuse for being an ass, on or offline. If you wish to read more into this, that is your prerogative. However, if and when I see TOS violation, expect me to use the report button.

If that is of concern to you, ask yourself why, because if you do nothing wrong you will not ever be reported. However, abusive posts are abusive posts. They serve no purpose except the edification of those who post them, and those who make them should be punished for them. Especially if it is clearly stated in the terms of service and code of conduct to be against the forum rules and regs.

By agreeing to play this game and to post on these forums, each and every one of us has agreed to them. Free speech as a right is neither applicable (only applies to governments) nor appropriate.

Edited by Pariah Devalis, 01 January 2015 - 10:12 PM.

[Kyle Wright]

Now aside from O'darkdemented one, with MS going Steiner now where does this leave CGB in the eyes of CW? What happens now with units like SJR and QQ switching to FRR? Will they go after Steiner in hopes of getting at MS or will the focus still be CGB.

[Gyrok]

Well, considering it was never any "true" GB units attacking...I have no qualms...

[LastKhan]

Noesis, on 01 January 2015 - 04:52 PM, said:

words.. propaganda... character assassination... So dark.. words

[Aresye]

Kyle Wright, on 01 January 2015 - 10:17 PM, said:

Now aside from O'darkdemented one, with MS going Steiner now where does this leave CGB in the eyes of CW? What happens now with units like SJR and QQ switching to FRR? Will they go after Steiner in hopes of getting at MS or will the focus still be CGB.

CI is still attacking us, but they're now working without MS support. I noticed you STILL don't have an attack lane into Kurita, so at the moment, I'd say the CW/CGB relationship is still good. We anticipate more attacks from CI and random pugs wanting to find a match later today.

I don't know exactly what all the comp guys are doing, but I do know a lot of them have some bad blood with MS, so I'd imagine the focus would be on Steiner now.

[LastKhan]

Noesis, on 01 January 2015 - 11:30 PM, said:

I would suggest finishing sesame street first before trying the long words last khan.

Might also help you if struggling with the NATO phonetic alphabet.

I dont think anything is going to help me to read that wall of you touting on about the same thing just in different paragraphs . That's just character assassination. all i did was "propaganda"

Funny that you still watch sesame street. Now we know the kind of deal you are by using such big words.

My, you're such a big boy Noesis..

Edited by LastKhan, 01 January 2015 - 11:42 PM.