729 replies to this topic

[Mordin Ashe]

I got rank 20, got my reward but that is about it, there is nothing encouraging me to stay loyal.
That sounds like the purpose of loyalty points might be broken, the current system renamed to "rewards for playing CW a lot" and something truly rewarding loyalty should be introduced.

Btw CW is out for 3 months now and still there is no change in loyalty rewards. I think that there should be some something more by now...

[CyclonerM]

Mordin Ashe, on 06 March 2015 - 02:45 AM, said:

something truly rewarding loyalty should be introduced.

It would be about time. Does "economic benefits for owning planets" suggest anything to you?

[Prussian Havoc]

CyclonerM, on 06 March 2015 - 05:22 AM, said:

It would be about time. Does "economic benefits for owning planets" suggest anything to you?

One can only hope PGI takes note of threads like this, but more importantly those specific "Feature Suggestions" gamers have taken the time to craft (because goodness knows, NO ONE ever comments over there!) when PGI puts the finishing touches on Community Warfare Phase Three (Logistics.)

Edited by Prussian Havoc, 06 March 2015 - 11:43 AM.

[CyclonerM]

Prussian Havoc, on 06 March 2015 - 11:42 AM, said:

One can only hope PGI takes note of threads like this, but more importantly those specific "Feature Suggestions" gamers have taken the time to craft (because goodness knows, NO ONE ever comments over there!) when PGI puts the finishing touches on Community Warfare Phase Three (Logistics.)

It will be too late then. Phase 3 should include a lot of features and deal with the aspects many of our suggestions are about, so it is either now or never i think

[Mordin Ashe]

CyclonerM, on 06 March 2015 - 05:22 AM, said:

It would be about time. Does "economic benefits for owning planets" suggest anything to you?

It suggests me that we still don't have them :-D
Nah, I know they could help a lot but until we get them I still have no reason to get back to my rank 20 faction because grinding up new rank in other faction still stays more beneficial.

Now if there would be some badass camo for rank 20 players that only those players could put on their Mechs, plus a camo that would be taken away once I leave said faction... Perhaps some artistic and intimidating depiction of Ghost Bear... aaaawwww .... drooling too much over here, damn it.

[Noesis]

Level awesomesauce decal?

[ApolloKaras]

Noesis, on 07 March 2015 - 01:19 AM, said:

Level awesomesauce decal?

Rank 50?

[Noesis]

Saxie, on 07 March 2015 - 02:17 AM, said:

Rank 50?

Definaltey and a over 9000 option aswell .... surely ... surely ..... maybe .... surely?

[VoodooLou Kerensky]

Noesis, on 07 March 2015 - 03:09 AM, said:

Definaltey and a over 9000 option aswell .... surely ... surely ..... maybe .... surely?

No, and dont call me Shirley!

[Noesis]

VoodooLou Kerensky, on 07 March 2015 - 03:22 AM, said:

No, and dont call me Shirley!

Can I use Veronica instead then, seeing as it is the weekend?

[InvisibleJim]

I don't agree that the 'clustering' of clans is a bad thing. It appears that the clans generally have a strong advantage and therefore after a period of growth this intentional effect causes the clans to infight and limit their expansion.

Essentially it is by design self limiting.

To be honest, its more important that PGI focus on introducing a number of different game 'sizes' in terms of players (4/8/24, how about stars and clusters?) and 'modes' in terms of objectives (i.e. convoy escorts, raiding, dropping, evacuations) and different weight class battles as well, to allow CW to bloom into a diverse and replayable game mode.

Edited by InvisibleJim, 07 March 2015 - 04:32 AM.

[Prussian Havoc]

InvisibleJim, on 07 March 2015 - 04:32 AM, said:

I don't agree that the 'clustering' of clans is a bad thing. It appears that the clans generally have a strong advantage and therefore after a period of growth this intentional effect causes the clans to infight and limit their expansion.

Essentially it is by design self limiting.

To be honest, its more important that PGI focus on introducing a number of different game 'sizes' in terms of players (4/8/24, how about stars and clusters?) and 'modes' in terms of objectives (i.e. convoy escorts, raiding, dropping, evacuations) and different weight class battles as well, to allow CW to bloom into a diverse and replayable game mode.

I agree, AS LONG AS there remains a single attack and defense options per faction, #ClanClustering will remain basically a #SpeedGovernor to any Clan Offensive. This is especially true of ANY Clan with only one Inner Sphere border (CSJ and SJF at start AND currently.)

[Tuann]

Brothers of CSJ,

today we have no attack lanes in IS.
As it was said many times over by CSJ, GB was kindly invited to take back planets that were lost due to merc assaults on GB territory.

We are therefor dropping on one of the planets that has a long GB history and was recently taken by VRGD. This is NOT an all out attack on CSJ and we will keep priority on IS planets.

regards

[ST0RM3R]

Tuann, on 13 March 2015 - 11:52 AM, said:

Brothers of CSJ,

today we have no attack lanes in IS.
As it was said many times over by CSJ, GB was kindly invited to take back planets that were lost due to merc assaults on GB territory.

We are therefor dropping on one of the planets that has a long GB history and was recently taken by VRGD. This is NOT an all out attack on CSJ and we will keep priority on IS planets.

regards

Maybe you look on first point of history?
And as I say playing rushgen not true and not skilled. And you refuse my trial. Sad.

[Cimarb]

Sorrowcry, on 13 March 2015 - 12:00 PM, said:

And as I say playing rushgen not true and not skilled.

Efficiency is the Clan way. <o

[Tuann]

Sorrowcry, on 13 March 2015 - 12:00 PM, said:

Maybe you look on first point of history?
And as I say playing rushgen not true and not skilled. And you refuse my trial. Sad.

the planets we lost are not available for us to drop on anymore,...

[Wing 0]

Tuann, on 13 March 2015 - 12:09 PM, said:

the planets we lost are not available for us to drop on anymore,...

you could've done something else if that was the case or let pgi know that a bug happened again.

[Tuann]

Wing 0, on 13 March 2015 - 12:23 PM, said:

you could've done something else if that was the case or let pgi know that a bug happened again.

We did contact PGI about it, rest assured.
Still, we took CSJ up on their honourable offer to take back planets that were lost during the merc incidents.

after taking the planet, we will gladly assist in Defense of other clans where possible.


and, pls check the history,.. planet taken by CSJ, retaken by KURITA, taken by GB, then CSJ attacked GB.
we took it from Is, never from CSJ.

Edited by Tuann, 13 March 2015 - 12:38 PM.

[Wing 0]

Tuann, on 13 March 2015 - 12:33 PM, said:

We did contact PGI about it, rest assured.
Still, we took CSJ up on their honourable offer to take back planets that were lost during the merc incidents.

oh really? who the fk said that? we were told NOT to handover or take anymore planets since the day we took a planet back that one planet from a merc unit took it from us. if you don't look the history date carefully it was stated that kurita defended it first then CSJ took it. later was GB

Edited by Wing 0, 13 March 2015 - 12:44 PM.

[ST0RM3R]

Tuann, on 13 March 2015 - 12:09 PM, said:

the planets we lost are not available for us to drop on anymore,...

You bring many planets back cause we (russian units of CSJ and SA) want to see you on kurita's borders. Do not tell me about mercs plz. Better go and def against frr to do not let them rise again. But you attack us. Well done well done.