It's 3v1 in your favour, Enemy calls for Zellbrigen. Will you respect it?
#41
Posted 28 June 2012 - 11:37 AM
#42
Posted 28 June 2012 - 11:39 AM
Quote
of cours I would
What? Are you guys so insecure of your skills that you are afraid to go 1 on 1?
You can not handle him without the help of your friends?
If we do not honor and respect the warriors we face in combat, and just slaughter them for fun and wanton destruction, we are nothing but simple murderers.
I would accept his challenge, and I would volounteer to go first.
There is no honor to just deliver the final killing blow to an already crippled opponent.
That is basically what veterinaries do.
Should he win, against all odds, he deserved it, and I only wish I would be taken as bondsman and apprentice.
#43
Posted 28 June 2012 - 11:46 AM
If it's 3 to 1 in my favor, then I assume it's because the other guy's forces have been obliterated by mine. Throwing away the advantage my team worked for and risk their lives, their mechs and the objective seems like a disservice to them.
Also, the other dude should've fought from the start instead of throwing desperate pleas for handicap after he got whooped.
#44
Posted 28 June 2012 - 11:47 AM
#45
Posted 28 June 2012 - 11:51 AM
#46
Posted 28 June 2012 - 11:51 AM
#47
Posted 28 June 2012 - 11:56 AM
#48
Posted 28 June 2012 - 12:26 PM
My responces is an AC/20 to his cockpit, and a calling in the salvage truck.
#49
Posted 28 June 2012 - 12:50 PM
#50
Posted 28 June 2012 - 01:54 PM
#51
Posted 28 June 2012 - 02:02 PM
#52
Posted 28 June 2012 - 02:05 PM
#53
Posted 28 June 2012 - 02:06 PM
But to be honest. I would never expect such a thing to happen, and I'd try my chances as the pilot vs 3. Hell if I can take down two mechs with me before I go down thats certainly more honourable than winning a 1v1. A lot more fun too, and a lot closer to winning.
Edited by Artaire, 28 June 2012 - 02:07 PM.
#54
Posted 28 June 2012 - 02:14 PM
If the enemy is a clanner, I would gank him as hard as fast as I could as those guys need to learn that war is war and not some kind of stupid game they think it is.
#55
Posted 28 June 2012 - 02:25 PM
You never limit your tactics because of what someone else labels "honorable" or because they've said you're afraid (note subjective honor and basic human ethics are two different things). You win using the tactics that will get you there. So, why on earth would you give up your advantage?
So 3v1 you kill the **** in a combined effort where possible and don't A) increase his odds of doing damage and B ) cost yourself more c-bills that affects your ability to fight long term.
Edited by Christian Soleater, 28 June 2012 - 02:26 PM.
#56
Posted 28 June 2012 - 02:52 PM
#57
Posted 28 June 2012 - 04:35 PM
no.
First, this is a nonsequitur. They only way this would happen logically in game is that someone is role playing the Clans. However, the clans have not arrived yet. The Wolf's Dragoons cannot be used as an example here, as they have hung their archaic notions of honor on the wall to blend in, so if someone was roleplaying, they'd have no basis for the knowledge they were trying to exploit.
Secondly, that smacks of a fair fight, one that I'm trying my utmost to avoid.
#58
Posted 28 June 2012 - 05:30 PM
I'm going to use IS tech only.
I'm going to use every dirty trick I know.
I'm gonna make a point of ruining a clanner's precious TimberWolf every chance I get.
IS vs IS I'll play fair because the field is level-ish.
Clan vs IS is no holds barred. If BV is observed, I might relent a bit. Without BV, clan tech is broken and I will destroy it every chance I get.
#59
Posted 28 June 2012 - 05:39 PM
Take it on the chin like a man.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users