Kain Thul, on 10 February 2015 - 03:02 PM, said:
I STRONGLY disagree. They had the chance to be good neighbors like CJF.
Not only that they suggested doing it to us many times using various excuses.....attack lane to Steiner, attack lane to CJF.
The chance to be good neighbors.............. you speak as if talking to a naughty child. Why would we enter into a NAP if not to be good neighbors? Watch your tone.
Kain Thul, on 10 February 2015 - 01:22 PM, said:
I have never even heard of this unit or seen them in-game. What kind of numbers are they throwing at you?
Cutting CGB in half to get back to the IS had the unintended consequence of creating a border with CSJ and while I am just one player everyone in our faction I have talked to has interest in DEFENDING CSJ, not attacking it. We enjoyed the short wait times defending your worlds over the weekend.
And you want to cut our OZ in half? You just shoot **** out of your mouth & do not care where the chips fall do you? Is Gyrok your master, padawan?
Duvanor, on 10 February 2015 - 03:07 PM, said:
But many of those conflicts were caused by bored mercs. After all that gloating about weak Wolves and stating how good the relations between the Bears and their mercs are I do not fully buy that they had absolutely no say on what happened. But they got punished enough now and we should leave all that squabbling behind us and get back on track.
We get our IS lane, let them get at least a connected OZ.
Exactly the mercs caused the problems. Punished enough? The mercs went somewhere else........ Where & when did the Wolves punish us? What do you mean you do not fully buy we no say on what happened? Show me in Mechwarrior Online where a faction unit can control the actions of a merc unit. Show me the game mechanics behind that & how to implement it because I would love to see it.
Did all of you get drunk at a party or something?
Edited by Jaroth Corbett, 11 February 2015 - 07:48 AM.