Support Your Wang - Dev Response Inside!
#61
Posted 16 February 2015 - 08:25 PM
#62
Posted 16 February 2015 - 08:28 PM
If the community has a strong opinion on something I don't see why they wouldn't allow these threads. Going back to the {Godwin's Law} forum days of niko won't do them any good. Frustrate customers probably, but nothing positive that's for sure.
I can tell you if this thread gets closed within any sort of reply that will be the nail in the coffin for this game for me and my roughly $100/year I spend trying to play it.
Edited by DTF Kev, 16 February 2015 - 08:31 PM.
#63
Posted 16 February 2015 - 08:33 PM
DTF Kev, on 16 February 2015 - 08:28 PM, said:
If the community has a strong opinion on something I don't see why they wouldn't allow these threads. Going back to the {Godwin's Law} forum days of niko won't so them any good. Frustrate customers probably, but nothing positive that's for sure.
and I wasnt trollin, I was genuinely curious if theyd removed it as I cant remember where the hell the rules are lol
Quote
Players CAN use polls to recommend New Features in the Feature Suggestion sub-forum only.
I guess that applies?
I remember reading where they had flat out said that petitions were disallowed but it looks like they changed it maybe
Edited by Mechwarrior Buddah, 16 February 2015 - 08:34 PM.
#64
Posted 16 February 2015 - 08:36 PM
#65
Posted 17 February 2015 - 05:51 AM
#66
Posted 17 February 2015 - 02:13 PM
Naduk, on 16 February 2015 - 06:15 PM, said:
It could be a much nicer box than what we have atm but its ok
That fugly lack of grit on the current cn9 is horrid
Yenlo is worst affected
Yup, look at my post back on page 2... Went from tiger stripes to stupid ZEBRA stripes!
#67
Posted 18 February 2015 - 01:15 AM
We need more support to get our wants fixed!
Im abstaining from playing until then.
#68
Posted 18 February 2015 - 03:12 AM
DTF Kev, on 14 February 2015 - 07:35 PM, said:
Please restore the AC20 arm on the Yen-Lo-Wang to its former glory. The stupid box with the stupid cylinder on it it's hideous looking and just a WTF scenario no ifs, ands, or butts. Period.
Original Design:
Current Craptasticness:
#69
Posted 18 February 2015 - 03:31 AM
#70
Posted 18 February 2015 - 06:14 PM
#71
Posted 18 February 2015 - 06:39 PM
Joseph Mallan, on 18 February 2015 - 03:12 AM, said:
Part of the problem, in addition to the barrel casing being anemic compared to what it was making it a Weeny Gun, it's not even centerline to the arm. Making it worse, of course is the lack of casing behind the gun barrel too.
It's tragic really, and PGI should feel bad. Because it's bad.
#72
Posted 18 February 2015 - 06:49 PM
#73
Posted 18 February 2015 - 07:01 PM
Every MWO player everytime PGI announces revised weapon geometry.
#74
Posted 18 February 2015 - 09:29 PM
Mercules, on 18 February 2015 - 06:49 PM, said:
I like that as well. I just want the original cannon to be the display for anyone carrying an AC20. Right now AC20 looks like ac10.
#75
Posted 22 February 2015 - 05:03 PM
Mavairo, on 18 February 2015 - 07:01 PM, said:
Every MWO player everytime PGI announces revised weapon geometry.
lolololol didn't see this before!
cause still needs love! c'mon suppot!
#76
Posted 22 February 2015 - 05:06 PM
#77
Posted 22 February 2015 - 05:07 PM
#78
Posted 22 February 2015 - 05:19 PM
Size does count !
#79
Posted 22 February 2015 - 05:29 PM
Mechwarrior Buddah, on 16 February 2015 - 08:25 PM, said:
don't know I have to admit
I don't see the problem with a petition if done respectfully
Top tip
Telling Paul to put his tackle in a food blender for castrating the Wang, would not be respectful, and shouldn't be part of a petition address
#80
Posted 22 February 2015 - 08:06 PM
Never Surrender!
Centurions, and Catapults!
10 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 10 guests, 0 anonymous users