Jump to content

Decrease In Quality Of Mechs Being Released


376 replies to this topic

#101 LordKnightFandragon

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,239 posts

Posted 14 March 2015 - 08:40 PM

View PostPrc, on 14 March 2015 - 08:15 PM, said:

Yep is poor, animations are indeed terrible wanna cry comparing to mw4 sometimes

Posted Image

mechs seems to be sliding/floating in mwo



MW4 models are just mostly bad......like that Summoner in your post....just hideous.

#102 Bloodweaver

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 890 posts

Posted 14 March 2015 - 08:55 PM

View PostLordKnightFandragon, on 14 March 2015 - 08:40 PM, said:



MW4 models are just mostly bad......like that Summoner in your post....just hideous.

Yes, their designs all looked like giant plastic toys. BUT, the post you quoted was specifically talking about how they were animated, not how they were designed. In comparison to a large swath of the 'Mechs in MWO, they were very well-animated in MW4.

Edited by Bloodweaver, 14 March 2015 - 08:57 PM.


#103 syngyne

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 710 posts

Posted 14 March 2015 - 08:55 PM

View PostPrc, on 14 March 2015 - 08:15 PM, said:

Yep is poor, animations are indeed terrible wanna cry comparing to mw4 sometimes

Posted Image

mechs seems to be sliding/floating in mwo


Never was a fan of the MW4 animations. None of the 'Mechs felt like they had mass, compared to MW3. Seeing them run around felt like I was watching a bunch of guys jogging around wearing boxes.

#104 Bloodweaver

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 890 posts

Posted 14 March 2015 - 09:02 PM

View Postsyngyne, on 14 March 2015 - 08:55 PM, said:


Never was a fan of the MW4 animations. None of the 'Mechs felt like they had mass, compared to MW3. Seeing them run around felt like I was watching a bunch of guys jogging around wearing boxes.

I agree, but even MW4 had better animations than some of the stuff in MWO. Who knew Dairy Whales were so bouncy?

#105 Jin Ma

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,323 posts

Posted 14 March 2015 - 09:05 PM

View Postsyngyne, on 14 March 2015 - 08:55 PM, said:


Never was a fan of the MW4 animations. None of the 'Mechs felt like they had mass, compared to MW3. Seeing them run around felt like I was watching a bunch of guys jogging around wearing boxes.


Posted Image

I feel like theres a good amount of weight to these. Overall the animation is just more fluid and believable

#106 KnowBuddy

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 435 posts

Posted 14 March 2015 - 09:05 PM

"What is that thing that looks like a smaller version of a 65 ton Catapult with its ears blown off?"


"Oh, that's just an 85 ton Stalker."

Edited by KnowBuddy, 14 March 2015 - 09:06 PM.


#107 syngyne

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 710 posts

Posted 14 March 2015 - 09:10 PM

View PostBloodweaver, on 14 March 2015 - 09:02 PM, said:

I agree, but even MW4 had better animations than some of the stuff in MWO. Who knew Dairy Whales were so bouncy?


I think all the assaults' movements make them feel too light and bouncy, with the exception of the Atlas.

#108 Bloodweaver

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 890 posts

Posted 14 March 2015 - 09:14 PM

View PostJin Ma, on 14 March 2015 - 09:05 PM, said:


Posted Image

I feel like theres a good amount of weight to these. Overall the animation is just more fluid and believable

Ehhhhh
Better than a lot of the assaults in MWO, sure.
Good amount of weight? Believable? Nah.

Think about it dude. Picture an ACTUAL HUMAN BEING sitting inside that cockpit. He's moving about two meters side-to-side with each step, in the span of about half a second. That cockpit would be impossible to see out of for all the puke covering the plexiglass... MW3 was vastly superior in this regard(and pretty much all other regards as well).

But, on the plus side? At least the footpads aren't sliding over the terrain the way the Dire's do at top speed in MWO.

Edited by Bloodweaver, 14 March 2015 - 09:43 PM.


#109 Quicksilver Aberration

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nightmare
  • The Nightmare
  • 11,797 posts
  • LocationKansas City, MO

Posted 14 March 2015 - 09:15 PM

View PostLordKnightFandragon, on 14 March 2015 - 08:40 PM, said:

MW4 models are just mostly bad......like that Summoner in your post....just hideous.

It was also 15 years ago when they created those, and look at how much better the profile of the MW4 Summoner is. Just how high the arms were compared to what we have now makes me nostalgic.

Comparing the looks of mechs between MWO and MW4 is like comparing MW4 and MW2 models, rather silly.

#110 Prc

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 191 posts
  • LocationBuenos Aires - Argentina

Posted 14 March 2015 - 09:23 PM

View Postsyngyne, on 14 March 2015 - 09:10 PM, said:


I think all the assaults' movements make them feel too light and bouncy, with the exception of the Atlas.


They were indeed, Nova cat and the Thanatos felt like flying.
But the animations and overall articulation of the legs and the feet was pretty sublime

#111 Mecha Buster

    Member

  • PipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • 37 posts
  • LocationDeep in your ***.

Posted 14 March 2015 - 09:29 PM

To be fair, in lore the Grasshopper was a taller mech.

#112 FupDup

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 26,888 posts
  • LocationThe Keeper of Memes

Posted 14 March 2015 - 09:31 PM

View PostMecha Buster, on 14 March 2015 - 09:29 PM, said:

To be fair, in lore the Grasshopper was a taller mech.

That's the same logic that made mechs like the Quickdraw and the majority of mediums close to the size of mechs that are a weight class heavier than themselves...

Please stahp.

Edited by FupDup, 14 March 2015 - 09:31 PM.


#113 Stoned Prophet

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 580 posts

Posted 14 March 2015 - 09:35 PM

I dont understand todays generation. In my day, we dealt with games as they came, we didnt whine to developers because "its not right cause I think differntly than you so CHANGE IT". Get over yourselves. Seriously. ;)

#114 Bloodweaver

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 890 posts

Posted 14 March 2015 - 09:42 PM

View PostStoned Prophet, on 14 March 2015 - 09:35 PM, said:

I dont understand todays generation. In my day, we dealt with games as they came, we didnt whine to developers because "its not right cause I think differntly than you so CHANGE IT". Get over yourselves. Seriously. ;)

Yes, how dare people expect to have any input regarding things they spend money and time on!

:rolleyes:

#115 Navid A1

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2022 Gold Champ
  • CS 2022 Gold Champ
  • 4,938 posts
  • LocationVancouver, BC

Posted 14 March 2015 - 10:24 PM

View PostStoned Prophet, on 14 March 2015 - 09:35 PM, said:

I dont understand todays generation. In my day, we dealt with games as they came, we didnt whine to developers because "its not right cause I think differntly than you so CHANGE IT". Get over yourselves. Seriously. ;)


yes... i lived through those days as well...
In those days there was a game with a certain price...you could buy it and it was yours..no more paying... and it was as it was. nothing was going to be degraded or changed... everything was there from the beginning.

#116 aniviron

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,752 posts

Posted 14 March 2015 - 10:32 PM

View PostStoned Prophet, on 14 March 2015 - 09:35 PM, said:

I dont understand todays generation. In my day, we dealt with games as they came, we didnt whine to developers because "its not right cause I think differntly than you so CHANGE IT". Get over yourselves. Seriously. ;)


Really? I've been playing online games since before the turn of the century, and players being upset with game balance is not a new phenomenon.

More to the point, it's not a bad thing. If your players don't give feedback, then they probably don't care about the game at all. As is, it at least functions as a metric to help create a balanced game.

#117 Malleus011

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 1,854 posts

Posted 14 March 2015 - 11:48 PM

The Resistance 'mechs seem kind of stiff to me, in the upper torsos/arms. Moreso the Enforcer and Zeus, at least so far.

#118 Joseph Mallan

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 35,216 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationMallanhold, Furillo

Posted 15 March 2015 - 03:29 AM

To my memory the Grasshopper IS taller than a Cataphract but was also much leaner.
Posted Image
It is only a Head shorter than a Banshee in this comparison chart.

#119 Juodas Varnas

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 7,534 posts
  • LocationGrand Duchy of Lithuania

Posted 15 March 2015 - 03:39 AM

View PostJoseph Mallan, on 15 March 2015 - 03:29 AM, said:

To my memory the Grasshopper IS taller than a Cataphract but was also much leaner.
Posted Image
It is only a Head shorter than a Banshee in this comparison chart.

But it's also only a head taller than the Enforcer and the Enforcer is currently tiny in-game.

Edited by Juodas Varnas, 15 March 2015 - 03:40 AM.


#120 Joseph Mallan

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 35,216 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationMallanhold, Furillo

Posted 15 March 2015 - 03:54 AM

View PostJuodas Varnas, on 15 March 2015 - 03:39 AM, said:

But it's also only a head taller than the Enforcer and the Enforcer is currently tiny in-game.

Id say it was on teh cusp of being head and shoulders taller but I am willing to split that hair.

I love the art in this game but the scale sometimes is... questionable. :unsure:





6 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users