Reseen unseen pictures
#181
Posted 06 July 2012 - 05:41 AM
#182
Posted 06 July 2012 - 05:57 AM
#183
Posted 06 July 2012 - 06:14 AM
i acknowledge the work of redesigning the mechs to bring them back, but some of the redesigns are just plain ugly. especially the warhammer, that reseen is just a no go
maybe its because i "grew up" with the unseen (almost literally ), so i`m having a hard time to accept the new designs. some of them are not that bad, like the longbow or the battlemaster, but i guess thats because they are pretty close to their original designs.
some of them are hillarious... in a bad way... for example, the locust or the shadow hawk. the later looks like someone just saw an episode of saber rider before doing the redesign
so far i think the redesigns from alex are looking pretty well, so if they put some unseen mechs into the game (what i sincerely hope), i think they should take the unseen designs and redo them instead of using the reseens. but since they redesigned all mechs they put into the game, i think i won`t have to worry about that, only what source they use.
edit/typo
Edited by Khushrenada, 06 July 2012 - 06:15 AM.
#184
Posted 06 July 2012 - 06:21 AM
New ones, definitely.
#185
Posted 06 July 2012 - 06:45 AM
Khushrenada, on 06 July 2012 - 06:14 AM, said:
i acknowledge the work of redesigning the mechs to bring them back, but some of the redesigns are just plain ugly. especially the warhammer, that reseen is just a no go
maybe its because i "grew up" with the unseen (almost literally ), so i`m having a hard time to accept the new designs. some of them are not that bad, like the longbow or the battlemaster, but i guess thats because they are pretty close to their original designs.
some of them are hillarious... in a bad way... for example, the locust or the shadow hawk. the later looks like someone just saw an episode of saber rider before doing the redesign
so far i think the redesigns from alex are looking pretty well, so if they put some unseen mechs into the game (what i sincerely hope), i think they should take the unseen designs and redo them instead of using the reseens. but since they redesigned all mechs they put into the game, i think i won`t have to worry about that, only what source they use.
edit/typo
I agree. some of the "reseen" designs are just horrid. I do like the version of the marauder one community member started. the thread is here
#186
Posted 06 July 2012 - 07:24 AM
Some of the reseen work just fine. The Stinger and Wasp are fine examples of mechs which, even if they look different, kept the right feel in my opinion, and the best example of these is the Longbow which looks like an improvement on the original. Then there are some that leave me with a feeling of "meh" whenever I see them (Griffin, Wolverine, Phoenix Hawk) and finally the ones that make me go "hell no!" (Marauder, Shadow Hawk, Valkyrie, Locust).
Now, the Unseen in their original unseen form? Barring a miracle I think we all realize we're not going to see that. However, Alex has proven that he can make even some of the boxiest, least attractive mechs look great (Centurion, anyone?) while preserving the feel of the machine. So I say he takes his queue from the original unseen and then redesign them sufficiently to avoid legal entanglements. I have every confidence that he would be able to do this while still preserving the feel and spirit of the original mech.
Edited by Steinar Bergstol, 06 July 2012 - 07:30 AM.
#187
Posted 06 July 2012 - 07:32 AM
Arguing art is like arguing taste in food, women, or music, no two will ever totally agree.
Some of the reseen stuff is good, some of it is an atrocity. Would I suffer a few atrocities to get Alex to remake the Marauder, damned straight I would.
#188
Posted 06 July 2012 - 07:46 AM
Steinar Bergstol, on 06 July 2012 - 07:24 AM, said:
Speaking of, I really like his take on the Centurion. In my humble opinion the Centurion he designed gives it an even better feel than any of the original artwork designed for it.
#189
Posted 06 July 2012 - 08:29 AM
Seems really disrespectful to the original artists that their work got ripped off and thrown into Battletech. Granted not all the FanPro designs were all that great either. The Marauder has a huge blind spot and the Warhammer just...eck. Yet the IIC versions of both were alright.
Arguing one way or the other here is pointless though. It wont look exactly like whatever you demand anyway since MWO has it's own style.
#190
Posted 06 July 2012 - 08:33 AM
#191
Posted 06 July 2012 - 08:51 AM
The Reseen Rifleman's mismatched weapon barrels really sold it for me; I always balked at how dissimilar weapons could look identical. Plus it's one of the few Ressen that looks bulky and substantial.
Same with the Reseen Longbow; tough, bulky, and substantial. Plus I love the idea of the "timelapse daisy" weapon covers... not only does my imagination make the opening of the covers look cool, but a clever pilot could use them as very clumsy hands.
Most of the other Reseen look wasted and anorexic, with odd bulges stuck here and there making them shapeless, horrible, and just a little bit sad... NOT the cool Mechs we know and love. I can accept the Phoenix Hawk in this Reseen format, as it's supposed to be skinny (and I love the flat "jet pack" intakes), but the others need more bulk.
As for the Marauder... I rather like the Reseen Mech design, but I just cannot accept it as a Marauder. If they had named it something else, put it somewhere else, I don't think anyone would have had a problem with it. It's like that American Godzilla movie: if they had called it a remake of The Beast From 20,000 Fathoms, it would probably have gotten excellent reviews from all but the most ardent Harryhausen fans. But because that thing was supposed to be Godzilla, expectations weren't met and the movie bombed. Such is the fate of the Reseen Marauder.
#192
Posted 06 July 2012 - 09:00 AM
Because, i want back the greateast Battlemech ever:
The Marauder!
#193
Posted 06 July 2012 - 09:04 AM
#194
Posted 06 July 2012 - 09:10 AM
The others, IMHO, look better reseen, but their unseen versions could be made to look awesome, courtesy of Alex Iglesias.
I doubt this will have any impact on anything, of course, since this is more of a legal matter than a personal preference.
#195
Posted 06 July 2012 - 02:54 PM
Melcyna, on 06 July 2012 - 04:29 AM, said:
it was IDENTICAL copy, of the material...
for example from my post above:
Rifleman (source: Macross, "ADR-04-MK-X Destroid Defender")
Warhammer (source: Macross, "MBR-04-MKVI Destroid Tomahawk")
Those are not just similar design, they are IDENTICAL... almost direct trace of the original design.
Well there is the Ostroc, Ostsol or Ostscout:
Neither of which look anything like this:
And yet the Ost... is somehow an Unseen.
At best I'd say there was some inspiration from this beauty, which made those beasts.
Same with the Behemoth / M.A.C. II Monster.
Edited by Monsoon, 06 July 2012 - 02:59 PM.
#196
Posted 06 July 2012 - 03:02 PM
well, anyway, reseen version as basis for MWO-style redesign win for now =)
#197
Posted 06 July 2012 - 11:11 PM
Monsoon, on 06 July 2012 - 02:54 PM, said:
Well there is the Ostroc, Ostsol or Ostscout:
Neither of which look anything like this:
And yet the Ost... is somehow an Unseen.
At best I'd say there was some inspiration from this beauty, which made those beasts.
Same with the Behemoth / M.A.C. II Monster.
sure, but the rest?
wholesale copy... which is the problem..
Hell, the Galleon tank? Direct duplicate including the name... they had to be nutz back then when they decided on this.
Incidentally did you see Ostroc MK2??
Edited by Melcyna, 06 July 2012 - 11:16 PM.
#198
Posted 06 July 2012 - 11:41 PM
Edited by Johndar, 06 July 2012 - 11:41 PM.
#199
Posted 06 July 2012 - 11:51 PM
#200
Posted 06 July 2012 - 11:52 PM
Johndar, on 06 July 2012 - 11:41 PM, said:
Something I think they missed the boat on was making interchangeable hand-held weapons. This was recently introduced within the past year or two (3085 or 3075 TRO), but it would have made a lot more sense back when so many 'mechs were depicted as holding guns.
ED: I take it back, it was the Experimental TRO.
Edited by Hayden, 09 July 2012 - 10:51 PM.
8 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 8 guests, 0 anonymous users