77 replies to this topic

[Davegt27]

http://mwomercs.com/...yyid-statistics

We've collected a big chunk of the Battle of Tukayyid Stats! Take a look at them below!
We got a lot of requests from Twitter but this is what we have so far.
I look forward to seeing what you statisticians can surmise from this data.
We may dig deeper at Tina's discretion. : )




Edit (Catalina Steiner): we have also a thread here.
Battle of Tukayyid - Statistics/

(also deleted the whole copied and pasted statistics)

Edited by Catalina Steiner, 02 May 2015 - 04:50 AM.

[Kira Onime]

Both sides have the same amount of destroyed mechs........ guess clans are still OP.
Waiting for nerfs.

[Mazzyplz]

how many destroyed thunderbolts? that's not enough!!!

double that please!


realistically that's because everyone is taking thunderbolts - 50 thousand thunderbolts used in the event...

oh my.. that's not revealing about the dangers of overquirking at all!!!! NO SIR! *plugs ears* LALALALALALALALALLAA

[Yokaiko]

My take away.

Davion actually do suck, with numbers backing it.

Holy crap, they are literally bads.

[Triordinant]

One third of the participants quit after getting 5 points or less. They must've been really frustrated.

[Vassago Rain]

Holy numbers, Batman!

[Malcolm Vordermark]

I'm not sure we needed a copy pasted version of this one subforum below where it is posted.

[Vassago Rain]

The first observation I make is that vindicators are so awful, there were more urbanmechs than vindis present.

[Devilsfury]

Thanks for the stats! This should inform the QQ, Whiner, Pee in my pants, cry babies saying that Clans are grossly OP. The numbers are pretty even across the board in killed mechs and damage. How much more proof do these guys need to show that things are pretty close. (in CW mechs) This by no means everything is perfect but in CW the mechs and loadouts are pretty close! Thanks again!

[AlexEss]

Well.. going by the numbers... clan heavies are way out of whack... But are balanced out by the rest being pretty much god awful. =P =D

[SuomiWarder]

Feel the need to point out to people posting that the stats show that the mechs (clan v IS) are close to even that the IS had a 10 tons per player bonus. That's 120 tons times 4 for a 480 ton advantage. If you get close to parity in damage with a disadvantage in throw weight the obvious conclusion is that at even up odds one side is better.

[Yokaiko]

SuomiWarder, on 01 May 2015 - 06:09 PM, said:

Feel the need to point out to people posting that the stats show that the mechs (clan v IS) are close to even that the IS had a 10 tons per player bonus. That's 120 tons times 4 for a 480 ton advantage. If you get close to parity in damage with a disadvantage in throw weight the obvious conclusion is that at even up odds one side is better.

I never used more than 5 tons of it, I didn't want to rebuild a Banshee, or run Highlander, and moving my light up to a 40 tonner seemed to be a false economy, I was happy with my 60 and 65 ton heavies, going to a Grasshopper or Phract also seemed like a bad idea.

I ran the entire event with 245, and even down to 240 if we needed ECM I'd run a Spider.

[Bloody]

You do not have to be a ******* genius to figure out that that some builds are simply better than others.

The numbers show how important weapon hard point placements are on a mech. Which is why there is few assault mechs on the clan list. Same with the light mechs only there probably as filler for weight limits. Speed and weapon placements > tonnage and overall armour.

sadly PGI response is MOAH LASER VOMIT WITH HIGH POINTS.

[Davegt27]

Rouken, on 01 May 2015 - 05:09 PM, said:

I'm not sure we needed a copy pasted version of this one subforum below where it is posted.

I figured they would take the thread down after a bit so no big deal they will take it down if need be

[IceFire]

Stats are way easier to read here than their bolded everything post

[Aegic]

IS brought TRIPLE the assaults to the table. LOL.

[Stifor]

It must be nice to be able to drop assault mechs with out gimping your drop deck.

Just look at the number of IS assaults used vs the number of clan assaults used.

Nope nothing wrong with this at all......

[R Razor]

Stifor, on 01 May 2015 - 08:23 PM, said:

It must be nice to be able to drop assault mechs with out gimping your drop deck.

Just look at the number of IS assaults used vs the number of clan assaults used.

Nope nothing wrong with this at all......

And yet the clans won..........so yeah, nothing wrong with that at all.............head, hatrack, etc etc etc

[LordKnightFandragon]

KiraOnime, on 01 May 2015 - 04:53 PM, said:

Both sides have the same amount of destroyed mechs........ guess clans are still OP.
Waiting for nerfs.

But the IS dealt more damage lol.

Those results dont look that Clans OPish...

And top clan mechs played, no Warhawks or Dire Whales haha.

[Tarl Cabot]

The assaults were primarily stalkers (54313) followed far off by battlemasters (18820) , both 85tons (edited - way too many rum/coke). There was also the 10 ton difference between IS vs Clan but overall it did not help for a variety of reasons.

As for the damage dealt, that is the difference between taking out only Omega vs having to have the most kills/prevent Omega destruction.

Maybe the next battle will have the Clans defending and the IS attacking. How do many of you think how that will turn out?

Edited by Tarl Cabot, 02 May 2015 - 11:19 AM.