ilKhan Judge Dreddrensky, on 11 May 2015 - 07:25 PM, said:
How hard is it to understand that
Comprehension has already been ascertained, you refuse to acknowledge your own hypocrisy in the situation.
ilKhan Judge Dreddrensky, on 11 May 2015 - 07:25 PM, said:
1) Authoritative body does X
PGI banned someone for cheating. Apparently someone from your unit that you're not happy about.
ilKhan Judge Dreddrensky, on 11 May 2015 - 07:25 PM, said:
2) Population who are under Authoritative body question X
No, a small cluster of people associated with the banned person are demanding to know how that person was caught to an extent of detail that will not be handed over due to the agreement you made when installing the program called the EULA, which is a legally binding contract.
ilKhan Judge Dreddrensky, on 11 May 2015 - 07:25 PM, said:
3) Authoritative body does not supply proof of support for X
All the evidence that is needed is stored in their own systems. You're not getting it in the level of detail you want. The evidence is the fact that people reported them, supplied evidence for their claim, PGI investigated it, and found the evidence to solidify the remainder of the case. According to several people in this thread, you can go dig around the reddits and find all the evidence you need.
ilKhan Judge Dreddrensky, on 11 May 2015 - 07:25 PM, said:
4) Population is skeptical of X
No, a small group of people from said unit are sent to troll the thread about PGI's action against cheaters, because they're upset about the black spot against them, now.
If you're truly a honest and honorably playing group, you'd kick the person to the curb and agree with the denunciation of the person, like many good organizations do throughout many games. They all have absolute zero tolerance policies.
Cheaters will always exist, and they'll always try to mingle with the people they consider the best of the best. That doesn't mean the people he's associated with should step up to troll for him after he's been caught.